Rep. Steve King (R-IA) Begs President Obama: ‘Please Dont’ Make Me Impeach You Over Immigration EO's
Source: The Raw Story Sunday, August 3, 2014 11:09 EDT
Rep. Steve King (R-IA) pleaded with President Barack Obama not to force the House of Representatives to begin impeachment hearings by taking executive action on reforming the immigration process after Congress failed to do so. In an interview on Sunday, Fox News host Chris Wallace asked King what Republicans would do if the president decided to take executive action to stop the deportation of 11 million undocumented immigrants.
None of us want to do the thing thats left for us as an alternative, King explained. But if the president has decided that hes simple not going to enforce any immigration law or at least not against anybody except the felons which essentially he has done already, this is a broader group of people I think Congress has to sit down and have a serious look at the rest of this Constitution, and that includes that i-word that we dont want to say.
The Iowa Republican added: And I only say that now because I want to encourage the president, Please dont put America into a constitutional crisis. Please dont do that. Theres too much at stake in this country to be decided that you can take over the Constitution and write it at will. Youre saying that if he were to do that, impeachment would be on the table? Wallace pressed.
I think then we have to sit down and take a look at that, King insisted. If thats not enough to bring that about then I dont know what would be. Weve never seen anything in this country like a president who says Im going make up all the immigration law that I choose.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/03/steve-king-begs-obama-please-dont-make-me-impeach-you-over-immigration/
The Wizard
(12,534 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Or a pension plan.
Or much of anything.
They have it made.
onecaliberal
(32,776 posts)By all means proceed representative King.
Display your full crazy in public while you continue to ignore the hideous war criminals from the last administration who walk free because they have the right skin color to hateful ppl like you.
More like Drama Queen.
What nonsense.
Curtis
(348 posts)Republicans aren't the ones talking about impeachment and that the only talk of it is coming from the White House
big_dog
(4,144 posts)let him do it! if he thinks this is great mid-term election strategy, let him lose both the Senate and House trying to impeach and force a constitutional crisis over executive orders
merrily
(45,251 posts)eggplant
(3,907 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Good one freshwest - yes he is so obviously part of the left-wing conspiracy to use impeachment for their own evil gains.
merrily
(45,251 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)King is way out there
big_dog
(4,144 posts)according to the Politico, they are all eating pizza at night together planning this madness
olegramps
(8,200 posts)jmowreader
(50,528 posts)The bastards are too cheap to spring for Papa John's.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)He plays to his base in around the Quad Cities. Lot's of impoverished older white folks of Germanic decent. You would think they were still fighting WWll and Adolf is their hero. So sad,so much culture in the area and to think there are pockets of stupid in our nation in the 21st century.
Itchinjim
(3,084 posts)We aren't his base.
lobodons
(1,290 posts)Even though you have used the EO less than any recent President, please don't make me Impeach you by doing your job while we are on vacation. Please don't throw me in that Briar patch.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)if King wants this so bad, Boner should give his caucus the red meat it really wants and make it a total democratic sweep of both houses of Congress!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)'Just look at her! What did she expect? She made me rape her!'
And:
'He shoulda known I was gonna rob him! It's not my fault.'
And the 'simply not follow the law' ruse is another lie they are telling.
Obama is following the law on children at the border signed and reauthorized by Bush before Obama got into office.
Yet it's illegal if Obama obeys it?
What's dangerous is the media making his words viral.
The initial meeting of the one-term only conspiracy was that no matter what PBO did, they'd ignore his authority, and they full intended to impeach him right after he was elected in 2008. Now GOPs put impeaching him in state platforms.
They said they had to destroy his legacy.
Which means they want to destroy the ideals and people the legacy benefits and the changes they elected him to make.
If America stands by and lets this travesty happen, as they did in 2010, and doesn't vote the GOP out of office, we're done both as a nation and as a relatively free people in the world.
alp227
(32,004 posts)It's going to be a HEAVIER 1998 for you guys.
graegoyle
(532 posts)"Weve never seen anything in this country like a president who says Im going make up all the immigration law that I choose."
According to Peter King (Ridiculous-IA), the United States Presidency came into existence after 2008.
Turbineguy
(37,285 posts)now go fetch me something to beat you with. You've made me be mean.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)amandabeech
(9,893 posts)numbered years.
One third of Senate members is up for re-election every two years on the even-numbered years.
That's your civics refresher course for today.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)thinking of donating to his opponent because there is no one I would rather see get beaten.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)I'm getting up there myself, and I need refresher courses on quite a few things.
tclambert
(11,084 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)by Scott Keyes - July 31, 2012
If you believe that the United States should legalize dogfighting because we allow humans to fight, fear not. Youve got an ally in the United States Congress.
During a tele-townhall late last week, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) fielded a question about his opposition to animal rights and recently introduced legislation that would undermine local standards preventing animal torture. Its wrong to rate animals above human beings, he told the questioner. To make his point, King argued that theres something wrong for society to make it a federal crime to watch animals fight but its not a federal crime to induce somebody to watch people fighting...
Of course, there is a very good reason we ban dogfighting and other similar forms of cruelty: animals dont have a choice in the matter. Manny Pacquiao chooses to step into the ring. Michael Vicks dogs did not. Similarly, when a human boxer loses a fight, he is not ritually executed after the fight. The same is not always true in dogfighting.
Unfortunately, King is a longtime advocate for legalizing dogfighting, cockfighting, and other forms of animal torture. Most recently, he fought legislation that would make it illegal to bring a child to an animal fight. He has also set aside his love for states rights in order to forbid localities from enacting anti-animal torture standards.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/07/31/615951/steve-king-dogfighting/
While I understand the paranoia of some farmers on other practices (and understanding is NOT the same as endorsing) he's taken his stance too far. Uncomfortable with the fact he keeps on getting elected, as he is a stain on his state's reputation.
But the last part, where he 'fought legislation that would make it illegal to bring a child to an animal fight' and 'forbid localities from enacting anti-animal torture standards,' shows he is wants to eliminate any moral fabric we have left in this country. Neither of those acts have any redeeming value for Iowa.
His latest poutrage was about immigration, but if employer sanctions were carried out, half the fuss would be over with. His last rant that was filmed and then put online is so dishonest, because he likely gets campaign money from farms who hire iimmigrants at low wages, illegal or not.
Something profoundly wrong with that man. But there are a lot of good people and Democrats in Iowa, it's just that they are overrun.
caraher
(6,278 posts)"Please proceed."
Baitball Blogger
(46,679 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,036 posts)Asshole. Even if the TeaPublican wackos think this is a good idea - the "party" still has enough collective memory to remember just how well this turned out the last time they tried it. This is all posturing to heat up the reich wing mouth breathers enough to extract cash from their wallets.
Even if they do get a majority in the Senate in 2014 and pull this off - what do they get? President Joe Biden? How does that help them? And what do you think will happen in the 2016 election? One more meaningless impeachment attempt might just end the GOP as a national party.
By all means dick head, bring it on.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)they've already put out all the red meat to the base that they can on immigration, foreign policy with the russians / middle east policy, hobby lobby etc so this is the political 'hail mary' pass since the election polls are still unchanged with the Dems leading +2. Are they nutty enough to hijack the country for 3-4 months for blatant political gain before a mid term election? This 'throw it against the wall' approach and see what sticks is not governance, its madness
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)The bastards started hijacking the country on January 20, 2009, and they haven't stopped yet. Two or three more months of this isn't a huge problem for them.
If you want to see how dysfunctional a party can be, consider: the John Boehner wing has asked the president to take executive action to fix the immigration crisis (because, of course, the Republicans ain't gonna have anything to do with it - if they spend money the teabaggers will have their asses, if they aren't harsh enough the teabaggers will have their asses and if they're harsh enough for the teabaggers Wolfgang Schwanitz, the last chief of the East German Stasi, will go on television to point out "y'all may be going just a bit too far..." and the Ted Cruz wing has threatened to impeach him if he does anything short of deporting anyone without blonde hair and blue eyes then passing out MRAPs and M60 machine guns to the KKK and the Craven Bundy Militia and deploying them to the Rio Grande Valley.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)just hope that they don't do more damage to the country before it happens
Zambero
(8,962 posts)Michelle B. and I concocted it especially for you, and now we've left town with no realistic solution. You'd better swallow it. Because given the current emergency situation, if you decide to do the proper thing instead on your own, then we will go off the rails with more impeachment chatter, even though our illustrious Speaker Boehner acknowledges that it's all a 'Democrat' ruse. So hey, PLEASE don't make ME do this because given the rhetoric spewed so far, it would make our true intentions appear questionable!
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Take a long walk on a Short Pier Peter.....
GoCubsGo
(32,073 posts)This is the whackjob from Iowa, not the one from New York. Actually, he's so batshit crazy, he makes Peter King seem sane and decent in comparison.
DinahMoeHum
(21,771 posts)So inept in his "fight against terrorism", he can't kick a duck in the ass unless he stands on a brick - and even then, he'd miss the mark half the time.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Who the heck does Steve King think he is?
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)his low-information-voter constituency is going to reelect him because of this.
Any congressman from a state like NY or CA would have not made such a stupid statement (although I am sometimes surprised) because they know they would get voted out with such imbecility.
4now
(1,596 posts)Obama has them so fearful over this that they can't even say the word impeachment anymore.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)[font size=5]Quit laughing, muddafukka--You're next![/font]
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)He'd rather file impeachment charges over Benghazi.
Republicans would rather not file impeachment charges over a crisis they created years ago. They think it would be better to file impeachment charges over a crisis they simply made up.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)rurallib
(62,373 posts)Jim is a good Democrat, a veteran and a family man with good Iowa and Democratic values.
Read more about Jim here:
http://mowrerforiowa.com/
Help Jim make king's threat moot here:
https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/mainpage?refcode=mp&amount=50.00&amounts=25,50,100,500,1000,2600,5200
Nothing says "Fuck you and your crazy rhetoric" to Steve King than helping King retire! You will feel GREAT in November when Mowrer wins!
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Or anything so serious that Democrats will?
Hekate
(90,538 posts)Aristus
(66,279 posts)The eternal rationalization of the abuser.
Jesus...
How the President gets through his day dealing with these monsters...
tclambert
(11,084 posts)They should impeach Obama for perpetrating an impeachment scam.
Acornsouth
(292 posts)John Boehner would become acting president....and here is a small example of what he would do.....
LeftishBrit
(41,202 posts)In personal relationships, begging someone not to 'make you' do something nasty is one of the hallmarks of an abuser. In politics, it just sounds slimy,
It also appears that some of the Republicans consider impeachment as a normal way of trying to get rid of a president with whom you disagree. Being of the opposition party is not a 'high crime or misdemeanor'!
jonjensen
(168 posts)rep king should be in a jail cell waiting trial on treason sedition and sabotage 'but obama won't arrest him and the other republican traitors.
Chemisse
(30,802 posts)"We didn't want to do it, but he made us!"