Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 01:40 PM Aug 2014

Study: Keystone carbon pollution more than figured

Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The much-debated Keystone XL pipeline could produce four times more global warming pollution than the State Department calculated earlier this year, a new study concludes.

The U.S. estimates didn’t take into account that the added oil from the pipeline would drop prices by about $3 a barrel, spurring consumption that would create more pollution, the researchers said.

Outside experts not connected to the study gave it mixed reviews. The American Petroleum Institute found the study to be irrelevant because regardless of the pipeline, the tar sands will be developed and oil will be shipped by railroad if not by pipeline, spokeswoman Sabrina Fang said.

The researchers estimate that the proposed pipeline, which would carry oil from tar sands in western Canada to refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast, would increase world greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 121 million tons of carbon dioxide a year.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2014/08/10/study_keystone_carbon_pollution_more_than_figured/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: Keystone carbon pollution more than figured (Original Post) DonViejo Aug 2014 OP
Isn't the API the industry propaganda arm? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #1
Not sure. SnakeEyes Aug 2014 #5
Well, when I google American Petroleum Institute, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #7
Gee... 2naSalit Aug 2014 #2
why is it always worse than thought more than expected cant anyone get anything right? leftyohiolib Aug 2014 #3
Eat, Drink and be Merry for not-to-many-tomorrows we die. BlueJazz Aug 2014 #4
I already question this study finding for the fact SnakeEyes Aug 2014 #6
...because lower oil prices will lead to more oil use mathematic Aug 2014 #8
the prices of oil will not drop, what a joke J_J_ Aug 2014 #9

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
7. Well, when I google American Petroleum Institute,
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 07:17 PM
Aug 2014

what comes up under their actual website link (www.api.org) is

www.api.org/
American Petroleum Institute
Represents all aspects of the U.S. petroleum and natural gas industry.
and so on.

So I'd say, yeah, they are.

SnakeEyes

(1,407 posts)
6. I already question this study finding for the fact
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 07:14 PM
Aug 2014

it's core is the debunked premise that this will do a damn thing about the price of a barrel of oil. No additional driling in NA will affect the price. We can't drill enough, worldwide consumption is massive, what is produced is a small insignificant fraction of that consumption. If we accept this study then we accept the core premise and we open ourselves up to the continued scam attempt to drill ANWR and other places.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
8. ...because lower oil prices will lead to more oil use
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 07:45 PM
Aug 2014

Geez, does anybody read these things before they huzzah, or knew-it-would-be-worse, or otherwise have their biases confirmed?

So people endorsing this greater carbon figure are also endorsing the claim that keystone will lead to lower oil prices. Good luck building opposition with that tactic.

 

J_J_

(1,213 posts)
9. the prices of oil will not drop, what a joke
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:16 PM
Aug 2014

It is not about supply and demand, it is about the Koch brothers speculation

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Study: Keystone carbon po...