Michael Brown suspect in robbery before he was shot to death, police say
Source: cnn
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/15/us/missouri-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Investigators named Michael Brown, the teen shot and killed by police in a St. Louis suburb, as a suspect in a convenience store robbery that occurred moments before the shooting, according to Ferguson police documents released Friday. The documents say Brown stole cigars.
-----------------------
(CNN) -- Now we have a name.
Darren Wilson is the police officer who shot and killed Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, police Chief Thomas Jackson told reporters Friday.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/15/us/missouri-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Period. Even if they're BIG AND BLACK.
FarPoint
(12,334 posts)Petty theft is a misdemeanor I believe.....the shoot to kill for a pack of cigs???
Anyone can be a suspect. .this is all distraction gargon. Taken straight out of the GOP playbook.
DearAbby
(12,461 posts)they were too heavy handed at. The Bundy Ranch, but cigars, empty your clip!
If this were the case why didn't they release this information sooner? Why wait five days and wach the situation get out of control? seize the opportunity to play with their war toys? The reason it was puchased in the first place?
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Disgusting, disgusting disgusting. Shame on the whole Ferguson Police department, but especially the cop who murdered him and the police captain for cooking up a 'justification' for this murder.
His family must be livid.
The horrible thing is, they probably are absolutely confident they can make this lie stick, and that they have the prosecutor in their pocket, or they wouldn't expose themselves to multiple other criminal charges (accessory after the fact, lying on a police report etc.)
THIS is why they waited...
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Thanks for the clear post with the actual report.
Now, for the murder report.....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Lets be clear. Swishers are two for a dollar. A box costed me fifteen bucks last time i had a party. You fill them with weed. Don't be dum.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Combined with normal things, does not get you deserving of murder.....sorry.
And I did not know that about these cigars....look at my avatar, how could I?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)My bad.
JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)I'm fucking pissed brave. Like really pissed off.
EVERY SINGLE BLACK MALE WAS A SUSPECT.
That's how that p.d. rolls.
We all know it.
Now where is Michael Brown's extensive juvenile criminal record? That's the next thing - 3 - 2 - 1
bravenak
(34,648 posts)When a black kid shoplifts, it's strong arm robbery! When a white kid barrels down the road in his high priced luxury vehicle and kills people, it's 'Affluenza'.
So, to sum it up.... Execution for black kids shoplifting, probation for white kids who kill people with their cars.
I want to bite something.
JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)Of Michael Brown in the street -
He was wearing khaki pants - at minimum - guy capris
And it looked like a layered white and black t-shirt.
Not a red tank top.
Now I'm confused - if he wasn't dressed exactly as he was in the QuikTrip - were they just looking for a black man?
Because that's what I'm thinking.
I'm thinking my 78 year old light skinned uncle otis with his fro and blue eyes would have gotten shot by this jackhole.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He can just about pass. But still has that 'look' that lets you know his origen.
I do not believe them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Black basketball shorts under his khakis. No red anywhere on his body.
JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)There is a little bit - but it's not the kind you put on.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thankfully I live in an apartment on the second story. The last time i fell out of a second story window i got not a scratch. My roof is as high as that window was. I'd just end up with a broken ankle.
The red. Was visible. I just want to grab that police chiefs' face and smoosh it.
JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)Where the dispatcher gave a red tank top as a descriptor?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)I was confused by that - I thought I saw him in a pic in a red shirt too. . .
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Notice it went from a 50 dollar case of cigars to a dollar pack?
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Becuz what really happened could happen to an older disorientated person who was agitated and I have seen a few stories about older esp. POC folks getting shot in confrontations that could be resolved too. Looks like cops just shoot anyone that pisses them off now or any hassle is an immediate execution sentence if the cop is hot headed enough
calimary
(81,207 posts)JustAnotherGen upthread called bullshit? Certainly! But "Affluenza" is the BIG BULLSHIT call here. Well, ONE of 'em, anyway. That kid who got off for "Affluenza" should be IN JAIL. For mowing people down and killing them. In JAIL - at best! (Um... that case sounded like first-degree with special circumstances to me, but again, I'm not a lawyer as I asserted elsewhere here yesterday.)
But you get shot for stealing a few little cigars? And you're left bleeding and dying in the street? Without anybody even checking to see if you can be resuscitated? For stealing a pack of little cigars? Excuse me? And are we absolutely sure it was Michael Brown in those store photos? And was he armed? If you had to shoot, why didn't you aim for shooting him in the leg? And if he turns around and throws his hands up (empty hands, too) you keep shooting??????????? And they couldn't have been forthcoming with ANY of this - maybe Sunday or Monday?????????? (Not that it makes any difference, really, stealing a pack of cigarillos, alleged thief is un-armed?)
I want to bite something, too, bravenak.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)A five dollar pack of swisher sweets is now a 'strong arm robbery'. And we don't even know that he actually STOLE anything. He may have just got into a confrontation with somebody accusing him of stealing. I have been accused and handcuffed. Nothing in my bag. Only my makeup. The guy screamed in my face and called me all kinds of dirty names. I ended up beating him with my gucci purse after the security guard uncuffed me.
I suppose i should have been shot as a strong arm robber. I hit him good with my purse. Spit was flying out of his mouth in my face. I hit him and hit him. The security had to stop me and grab him and take him to the back. That's normal for people who look like me in America. Store owners feel no compunction about screaming nd antagonizing black people for shopping.
Remember those black men arrested at Barneys for useing their OWN fredit cards?
Cigars are kept behind the counter out of reach of customers. I used to work at Holiday. If somebody stole we wrote it off as shrinkage and refused to sell to them again. That was procedure. You do not get into their face and confront then in the manner i saw on the snapshots. That is aginst procedure. There is a manual. And a test.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)alp227
(32,015 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)So what are they gonna make up so Fox can sell advertising.
PatSeg
(47,391 posts)"Robbery" instead of "shoplifting" - "Convenience store robbery" sounds like an armed robbery. They're going to try and paint the dead boy as a thug, which still isn't going to justify murdering an unarmed person with their hands up.
dhill926
(16,336 posts)CrispyQ
(36,454 posts)I agree, they are trying to paint Michael as a thug to justify their killing.
George II
(67,782 posts)CrispyQ
(36,454 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)PatSeg
(47,391 posts)that being a young black man is all the justification that they need in this country.
RoverSuswade
(641 posts)Declaring his past behavior justified his murder.
PatSeg
(47,391 posts)who of course can't defend himself. How much loss do they expect his family to suffer? So cowardly and so predictable.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)Makes no sense
But, regardless, does NOT justify being murdered!
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)Although it only took 5 days, someone noticed that the dead kid laying in the street had on the same clothes as the guy in the video.
Leave it to the slueths at faux to Figure that out.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though that varies by state. When I was working in a gas station in MS we were told to say "stop" (but not try to stop them), because that changed it from shoplifting to robbery. No idea what the law is in MO though.
PatSeg
(47,391 posts)and minor theft of merchandise was referred to as "shoplifting", whereas theft of money was considered "robbery". Confrontation would have been considered robbery.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Once he put his hands on the clerk it became a felony
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)I will never accept the shooting of anyone who steals a car or anything else. It's material objects and they do not equate in any way to the value of human life.
valerief
(53,235 posts)during car chases. They want what they want and fuck all else. Crazy shits.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)which if that is what initially happened is a far cry from the whole officer just came along and shot him for just being in the street people were gnashing their teeth over.
In the end though since none of us here were there we need to wait for the FBI to conclude its investigation.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)The "stop" was driving by the "suspect(s)" and telling him/them to get out of the street and to walk on the sidewalk ... and the "questioning" was asking: "What did you say?", when the "suspect(s)" mouthed off.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)It could explain the whole officer wanting him off the street.
Like I said though its best to wait until after the investigation is completed by the FBI as there are just alot of things that could have happened and if the shooting was justified of if the cops just an asshole who needs to be in jail.
George II
(67,782 posts)...did you see the surveillance photographs? Looks like assault, too. And we don't know anything beyond that.
It's not "big and black", it's assault and robbery and possibly more that we don't know about yet.
The more I see, the less I think that it's as one-sided as it appeared a few days ago.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I worked at a gas station. Procedure was to NOT get into a shoplifters face. We would refuse service and call the police if the amount was high enough. If sonebody got in my face and grabbed at me accusing me of stealing, i'd smack the shit out of them. Stay behind the counter. Like the cigarillos. The cigarillos are not within ANYBODY's arms reach. Even Shaq cannot reach out and steal cigars from quickie marts.
We had to keep them AWAY from minors. Therefore, they are ALWAYS kept a hoid distance AWAY from the register. It's easier to steal cigarettes, they put them in the overhead slots. Bullshit.
I will not be spoonfed lies in order to justify a cop gunning down a kid in cold blood. He shot him while he was running AWAY!
Jumping out of my window now, thanks alot DU. I'll break my ankle for sure.
George II
(67,782 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)The fact that he physically tried to confront a shoplifter suspect and lock him inside the store. I'd push him out of my way too. You can't hold people hostage. And if you attempt a citizens arrest, you better be aware that you may get pushed put of the way.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Locking the door is legal.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)What a perilous endeavor!! I'd not suggest that to anyone. Recipe for a beatdown. Lock me in a store and i'll kick the glass to pieces. I do not take well to hostage situations with me as the hostage. What a dumb idea. Lock yourself in with the 'strong arm robber.' If he was so scared, wtf would he lock himself in with the guy? Seems like he was the AGGRESSOR.
George II
(67,782 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And you better be damn sure you can take a guy that you accuse of a crime and try to physically hold hostage.
Better to not touch a 'strong arm robber' and lock yourself in with a 'strong arm robber'.
You can't blame anyone if you try to hold a guy twice your size, lock him into a store with you, and think you are going to keep him there by force.
Why the hell do people think they are the police and can just lock somebody in against their will? What a stupid idea!!! Locking yourself in and holding a 'strong arm robber' hostage.
Reter
(2,188 posts)No way could this owner have detained him fair and square, and letting him go isn't an option either.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It was a PACK of cigars!!! A two liter coke costs more. So does a hagen daaz ice cream. What a stupid statement!! Letting him go is not a option.
Reter
(2,188 posts)After all, it isn't worth much, right?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They must be in a bad way if they're stealing CD's. Things mean nothing to me. I would probably ask if everything was ok. If not and I had extra money to spare, I'd give them 50 bucks on top of that.
Humanism. Try it sometimes.
Reter
(2,188 posts)No thanks, I'll never try it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)n/t
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)Giving to thieves however is not something I would to.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm different. I let people get away with little stuff, and focus on real shit.
Reter
(2,188 posts)But I can't just let someone take something I do need.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But if they do, don't shoot.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)not to chase them, even if they stole a tank of gas. They only worried about what their employees stole. All cameras were pointed on the clerk and the cash register at all times.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I had a camera on my register and lock box. They only care about the money. And we were told that in case of robbery, give them ALL of the money in our till. Do not hesitate. Just let them have it.
PatSeg
(47,391 posts)that it took the police almost a week to release this information, especially when they've been under attack all week. This just does not smell right and in many respects it makes it worse.
edit for typos
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Delphinus
(11,830 posts)*you* on this. Something stinks.
PatSeg
(47,391 posts)claimed they released the video only because the media requested it, but could not identify who requested it. That guy is such a bad lair, he gets so nervous during these press conferences.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)and then 5 more when he turned around. Did the cop know Brown and there was bad blood between them?
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/08/man-may-have-live-tweeted-michael-brown-death.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/15/witness-michael-brown-photo-dead_n_5683166.html
The PD has been covering up since Day 1. The police chief could barely make any sense today, to the point one reporter asked, "What are you saying?"
PatSeg
(47,391 posts)It appears that the witnesses accounts are all pretty consistent. This police department has been getting away with crap for a long time and its finally catching up with them.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)you really need to quit.
savalez
(3,517 posts)Michael Brown suspect in robbery AFTER he was shot to death, police say
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The camera didn't see him steal anything. It showed the shopkeeper come and confront the victim to physically prevent him from leaving the store. He got pushed to the side. I was always told to stay behind the counter when people were in the store. And to log the missing items in. Not physically confront a suspect.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Covering their dirty tracks.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)use the taser, not the gun.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Then he had to kill him so he couldn't tell his side. The police chief is an idiot. The whole department needs to be fired and let securitas or guardian security handle it until they get new police from inside the town of Ferguson. Security guards rarely shoot. My stepdad was in the Marine corps during Vietnam. He said he caught a kid with a grenade one day. He asked the kid to hand it over and held out his hand. The kid gave it up. Then they fed the kid. It sounds like our military handles teens better than our local police.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Mine (movie version) is they knew each other and had bad blood between them. Maybe Wilson was involved in drug sales and something went down with Brown he didn't like.
According to believable witness @ThreePharoahs, Brown was shot first 2x in back while running away, 5x in front when he turned around. Also tweeted that he didn't see any reason for the shooting.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/15/witness-michael-brown-photo-dead_n_5683166.html
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/08/man-may-have-live-tweeted-michael-brown-death.html
Cop is either out of his mind or one of our theories may be correct.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)None of the cops actions make sense. And the way they are playing it is shameful.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)He kept stammering, pausing, looking around furtively. One of the reporters asked, "What are you saying?" or something to that effect. Then chief said Brown was accosted for walking in the street and Wilson didn't know anything about the store theft. But soon the chief said Wilson saw the cigars so thought Brown was the thief. geesh. The PD couldn't be any worse. No wonder the locals are pissed with a PD like that; even without this incident they're a nightmare.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)so I'm revising my theory. I now think the cop has an anger management issue and he just went nuts when Brown wouldn't obey.
snip It looked as if Michael was pushing off and the cop was trying to pull him in, Tiffany Mitchell told CNN on Wednesday night.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Got mad, shot him, then had to chase him to finish him off. He knew he would get away with it.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)So far, 4 eyewitnesses I've read about. Thank goodness Holder's in charge instead of the PD
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I hope they feel stupid and under pressure. The chief looked like a nervous stuttering fool at the presser.
Kennah
(14,256 posts)bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)they would appear to also have the eyewitness accounts of two other people, including the friend of Brown, Johnston.
And maybe others in or near the store. And a clothing match.
That is usually how they do it. This report is the executive summary, it will be on top of an inches thick file.
The crucial part is the second report, the murder report and supporting evidence to the report.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I'm not buying that bridge.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Social media or otherwise, otherwise I am just another follower led by the nose in one tribal camp or the other.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I think they have nothing but a great cover story they've been manufacturing. I highly doubt a man about to go to college would rob a place for cigars. I don't see a man with a clean record and college bound throwing that away. The police want everyone to believe that any black man is a potential felon as this is the heart of their world view and the justification in their minds for their brutality.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)what immaturity can do to some college bound, criminal record free, from a good family 18 year olds.
I am just reserving full judgment until all the evidence is in, the media is not, I am in the minority, I get it, no point to keep going on and on about it.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)You never worked in LAW ENFORCEMENT.
Look, let's break this down a bit. An unarmed suspect, allegedly stole 8-10 cigarillos from a store. The suspect allegedly grabbed the victim (crime victim allegedly) during the incident.
Thirty minutes later, the office investigating the alleged robbery sees a suspect matching the description walking down the street.
What do you do?
FIRST: FOLLOW the suspect and CALL for back up to confront the suspect.
SECOND: After back-up is on the scene, confront the suspect.
THREE: If the suspect runs, the officers engage in a SMALL pursue. If the suspect flees completely, use the VIDEO from the CRIME SCENE to positively id the suspect.
FOUR: Go to the suspect home, with back-up. Ask the suspect questions if allowed. If not, request the suspect after obtaining his or her LAWYER, have the suspect come to the police station for identification.
FIVE: Positively id the suspect based on the FELLOW person accompanying the suspect in the video.
SIXTH: Refer the case over to prosecutor for charges.
GUESS WHAT HAPPENS in this scenario? NO ONE IS DEAD over stealing 8 FREAKING CIGARILLOS or shot in the streets 8-10 times like a dog.
GET A GRIP!!!!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)FarPoint
(12,334 posts)That never happened.
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)Up until today, there was no suspect. When Brown was killed, there was no knowledge he was in the store. Someone put this together after noticing the similarities between the dead kid in the street and the guy in the video.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The Ferguson PD have demonstrated that they are not a competent police department.
ReRe
(10,597 posts).... is the complete autopsy report. Does Mike Brown's clothes match up with the man at the convenience store? What happened to the box of cigars? Were any of the cigars in Mike's pocket? Prints anywhere?
What about his friend. What was he wearing? Did the police take the friend in on that day and ask HIM some questions? If not, why not?
I just hate it when they piece-meal the facts.
And if Mike Brown's family sees the convenience store tape today, could we expect to hear from them? i.e., whether they recognize the person on the tape as Michael?
Where's that GD box of cigars?
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... I'll see if I can find something in print...
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)Maybe the cop's name was really Cheney.
SaltyBro
(198 posts)We all did stuff like that when we were teenagers. Let this kid RIP already!!!
JustAnotherGen
(31,809 posts)Eh . . . he doesn't get that now?
It's just -
He stole.
So he had to die.
Funny how that works for us black folks eh? We just get shot. Those thugs and punks ALWAYS get away with it.
Always.
savalez
(3,517 posts)cojoel
(957 posts)He would have had to ditch the cigars and cap, lose some weight, and become younger in age, all in a very short period of time.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)And grew up somewhere that everybody did that?
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)and I had plenty of friends who did the same. We drag-raced cars in the street, drove in "caravans" across the the state line to Mississippi to dance at honkey-tonks and drink beer, fought over girls, jumped off of bridges into rivers, skipped school to go to Dauphin Island, etc., etc. etc.
So, yeah, I'm well aware that not every body acted like this when they were young, but a lot of young men did growing up in Mobile, Alabama in the 1970s.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)(which I assume the police are saying was likely because he might have been a robbery suspect) you can't shoot an unarmed fleeing man in the back who's holding up his arms and saying don't shoot. If the police are saying Michael Brown was a bad person, it doesn't give the police the right to murder him.
crazylikafox
(2,754 posts)PatSeg
(47,391 posts)If he had been stopped because he was REALLY a suspect in a so-called "robbery" (shoplifting), it would have come out right away.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)I even seem to recall that part of the reason he was checked out was because of the nearby robbery.
Of course this was no reason for his murder, and that is what it was, murder. But being as I am a liberal, I say we treat the murderer better than he treated his victim. I say we give him a trial.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)That is why the dispatch tapes that Anonymous released are so important.
They have the report after the shooting, in which there are NO police calling for EMS or reporting "shots fired".
If they can go back and get the earlier tapes of the store robbery...
(which may not exist or may have been destroyed).
Cops have had a week to figure out a story.
rurallib
(62,406 posts)"Jesus, boys, we gotta charge that kid with something or our goose is cooked."
still_one
(92,122 posts)Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)Not only with lying about the victim, but lying about the protesters as well. I wouldn't be surprised if they had a few provocateurs in the crowd as well. Just like other police departments in larger cities have done in these past few years.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)when they encountered the police officer. We are relying on the statement of his companion, a potential accomplice to a strong arm robbery, for the narrative of how the encounter first started. That narrative is now suspect. Also Brown now has a reason to not comply with an officer which may have been what led to the initial struggle. The initial meme was that this was a good kid who would have no reason to struggle with an officer. If he engaged in a strong arm robbery before his encounter with the police officer then he would have some motivation to struggle.
The initial struggle is still not an excuse, after the officer and Brown disengaged, with later shooting him. Hopefully the forensic evidence will reveal whether he was shot fleeing or shot after he was on the ground. Also at what distance was he shot.
Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the narrative is now suspect?
The, now, suspect witness statements indicate both ... he was shot will fleeing and then a couple more times as he was headed to and on the ground.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)What happened to the punishment should fit the crime?
What happened to common sense?
A cigar vs. a tank?
I am glad that the militarization of the police in America is now more visible. Will the conversation continue? Donno.
marble falls
(57,073 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)body.
That video is too distorted to identify him.
d_b
(7,463 posts)but why was he gunned down if he was 10, 15 feet away with his hands in the air? It doesn't matter if he was a cigar box thief or a serial killer.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)but until you are dead? What happened to the trial and jury system?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)So when police say it it's the truth now? That's laughable.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Brown wouldn't obey so Wilson chases him down and shoots him. Lucky his wife wasn't at the other end of his gun
Iggo
(47,548 posts)If he was a robbery suspect they would have been saying "robbery suspect" a hundred times a day for the last six days.
They're making it up and it's sickeningly obvious.
harun
(11,348 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)And alleged robbers are still entitled to due process. Summary execution is always wrong.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)The officers got the wrong man, but charged him anywaywith getting his blood on their uniforms. How the Ferguson PD ran the town where Michael Brown was gunned down.
Police in Ferguson, Missouri, once charged a man with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms while four of them allegedly beat him.
On and/or about the 20th day of Sept. 20, 2009 at or near 222 S. Florissant within the corporate limits of Ferguson, Missouri, the above named defendant did then and there unlawfully commit the offense of property damage to wit did transfer blood to the uniform, reads the charge sheet.
The address is the headquarters of the Ferguson Police Department, where a 52-year-old welder named Henry Davis was taken in the predawn hours on that date. He had been arrested for an outstanding warrant that proved to actually be for another man of the same surname, but a different middle name and Social Security number.
I said, I told you guys it wasnt me, Davis later testified.
He recalled the booking officer saying, We have a problem.
I'll never believe one word that comes out of that incompetent police department.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Robbery requires force or the the threat of force (e.g. pointing a gun at someone and demanding property.)
Slipping a couple of cigars under your shirt is a minor theft.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)The man the police identify as Brown apparently lays his hands on who I believe is the storekeeper. The storekeeper after the disengagement is clutching his throat (or at least has his hand near his throat). That is strong arm robbery and not shop lifting.
Robbery in the second degree.
569.030. 1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property.
2. Robbery in the second degree is a class B felony.
(2) For a class B felony, a term of years not less than five years and not to exceed fifteen years;
Still to be determined whether Brown is in that video.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)And yes, the statute you posted is consistent with what I wrote about robbery vs. shoplifting. Force or intimidation are necessary.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)or some such impartial site (No doubt) ... so it's understandable that most here missed it ... but not others.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)robbery or not, this does not allow a cop to shoot a potential or actual perpetrator of this possible act in cold blood while said person is holding his hands up in response to actual or suggested orders from the cop.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)It is a Robbery that is allegedly shown in the still pictures and the video. The video has been released on MSNBC and the entire incident was less than 45 sections.
The Suspect appears in the video attempt to walk out of a store holding the alleged cigarillo's stolen in hand.
The alleged Victim runs in front of the door of the store, allegedly to stop the Suspect from leaving the location with the alleged cigarillo's stolen.
The Suspect pushes the alleged Victim out of the exit door of the store, near a store rack, and immediately let's go of the Victim in less than 10 sections.
The Suspect proceed to walk out of the door with another individual.
The Victim begins to re-approach the Suspect again.
The Suspect turns to the left to re-approach the Victim, however does not re-confront the Victim in any assaultive way. Words are exchanged.
The Suspect turns back to the right towards the store door and walks out of the door with the alleged Cigarillo's, with another individual.
The Victim approaches the door and appears to be yelling out of the door, while holding the door.
The Suspect is not seen again in the video at this point.
NOW....since that is out of the way, the force used by Law Enforcement Official DARREN WILSON in response to this alleged Robbery was excessive! To shoot an Alleged Suspect in a alleged Robbery 8-10 Times in the streets like a DOG for allegedly pushing a store clerk after allegedly stealing Cigarillo's, this action DOES NOT fit the nature of the alleged crime!
Officer DARREN WILSON should be charged with Murder in the First Degree and Police Chief Thomas Jackson MUST RESIGN from the Ferguson Police Department for failing to train his staff in proper procedures in engaging criminal suspects, along with failing to instruct his staff to call for BACK-UP as a MANDATORY ACTION for engaging a suspect in an alleged robbery WITHOUT a WEAPON.
The Force Used DOES NOT FIT the ALLEGED CRIME. In addition, Ferguson Police Chief THOMAS JACKSON must be FORCED to RESIGN for TAINTING the investigation of the KILLING of Mike Brown!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The confrontation in the store may have been over attempting to purchase tobacco products without ID.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)roll up to "robbery suspects" and tell them to get out of the street and walk on the sidewalk, then proceed on until the "robbery suspect" mouths off.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)It doesn't make sense, that's for certain. No way would a cop be that casual about a "suspect."
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)it appears that the "robbery suspect angle" is falling apart. http://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5390566
But as I wrote in response to the above:
1) Disavowing the "robbery angle";
2) Announcing that the Officer, and everyone with knowledge that this "angle" was to be used, has been fired, if not, arrested for conspiring to impede the investigation, and/or cover up what appears to be a wrongful action.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)Of course by now Faux "News" will be reporting this robbery angle with gusto, and Michael Brown will be taller, bigger, and loaded down with an arsenal.
But good, very good, to see this "robbery suspect" business is already falling apart. I don't know if the Police Department in Ferguson will hang onto it or not, maybe out of desperation to justify this murder. If they do, they'll look even worse than the Sanford PD, and that's saying something.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)Well, that's it, then. Case closed.
Sounds like the narrative is being constructed.
BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)Little nimrods sitting around building their bullshit narrative all week before they release the cop's name because they no that's a whole new shit storm for them.
Per the witness who was with him at the time of the incident, this confrontation started because Michael Brown was told to walk on the "fucking sidewalk," and apparently didn't hop to it the way the officer wanted. It had nothing to do with questioning a robbery suspect.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)and totally makes the murder of an unarmed person acceptable...
oh wait.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)initially were under the impression the officer just came along, stopped the kid for no reason and then shot him but if he was a suspect in a crime then the officer had a reason to atleast question him though that is assuming the whole thing about there even being a robbery isnt complete and utter BS.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Why did he not stop, get out of his patrol car and ask for I.D.? Their story doesn't match with the facts. Were cigars found on his body? If so, were they planted? The stories all say the cops ignored the body for hours, did they not search him to look for the stolen cigars? If they found marijuana in his blood they will argue he stole the cigars to make blunts. Maybe this is why they waited until the autopsy results to come out with their story.
Lots of unanswered questions!
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)always to the curb and or to a side road but never in the middle of a street.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the police officer yelling get out on the sidewalk, DRIVING OFF, STOPPING, BACKING UP and asking "What did you say?"
Or are you unfamiliar with the witness' statement and are just explaining by ear?
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)tell you what, YOU wait.
we'll talk.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)eff that.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)After telling the officer that they were almost at their destination, Johnsons house, the two continued walking. But as they did, Johnson says the officer slammed his brakes and threw his truck in reverse, nearly hitting them.
Now, in line with the officers drivers side door, they could see the officers face. They heard him say something to the effect of, whatd you say? At the same time, Johnson says the officer attempted to thrust his door open but the door slammed into Brown and bounced closed. Johnson says the officer, with his left hand, grabbed Brown by the neck.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/eyewitness-michael-brown-fatal-shooting-missouri
savalez
(3,517 posts)IMO it doesn't mesh with the "suspect" angle at all.
CRH
(1,553 posts)I saw this interview from Johnson on the news. It was before it was known Johnson was at very least, present at the robbery. Then my thoughts start to wander to the perspective behind this eye witness account. Then the still photos produced from the security tapes, show that Michael Brown is a huge man. I guess my confusion with Johnson's account is how does the officer in the car while sitting in his seat grab a very large and strong man through the window by the neck? For me this eye witness account is confusing? Do you have any further information on this?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)or have you ever ridden in a truck? it's not very difficult to reach out and grab someone by the neck, while seated ... in fact, I would argue that the larger the grabee, the easier the grab.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If the cop couldn't grab HIM, how could Mike have possibly grabbed his gun?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Lazy negroes, saving the 'magic' to do 'strong arm robberies'. There are cotton fields to pick and jails to go to and abortions to get.
Ahhh, I miss those days of cotton picking and lashings!! I sometimes think that some are just angry they don't own us anymore. Many were bitter about losing their property. Some still are. Kinda like 'if i can't own you, i 'll kill you.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)white womens to bed!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You member that time that one told somebody we know to blank a black mans blank? Earlier this week? A drunk male one stepped to me and my husband and worried about his blank for five minutes straight. I was shocked(no i wasn't)!! Dude told him to pull it out, that the size myth was a myth. (Not a myth,)but also not gonna happen. This ain't no breeding farm!!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Foundation, counselor?
muntrv
(14,505 posts)Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)They don't have video of a robbery.
As a former CLERK at a gas station. We were not allowed to CONFRONT suspected shoflifters like that. We were to write it on the paperwork and refuse to serve them. There is a device we wore around our necks, like a life alett.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)That's what I was told. Never put yourself in danger over a corporations money. My boss said that that was why the insurance was paid. Not worth it for 10 bux an hour.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)What's the time stamp on the video for the act of robbery?
Trillo
(9,154 posts)"He wasn't going to take any questions."
Anansi1171
(793 posts)...so long as he's imperfect and black, his killing is justified in their view.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)The Ferguson Police Department and particularity Police Chief THOMAS JACKSON is trying to "Justify" the shooting of teenager Mike Brown 8-10 times, to stealing 8 Cigarillo's in a store 30 minutes earlier.
So stealing Cigarillo's to Police Chief THOMAS JACKSON and the murdering cop DARREN WILSON means the person should be SHOT 8-10 times in the middle of a PUBLIC STREET in DAYLIGHT, like a DOG.
Really now? Please spread the FERGUSON POLICE DEPARTMENT SHAME in Justifying the EXECUTING of a African-American teenager for stealing allegedly cigarillo's.
Independent Underground News & Talk
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025390122
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)alp227
(32,015 posts)on Wednesday: http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local/2014/08/13/michael-brown-ferguson-shooting-no-criminal-background/14023731/
And it really took police this long to reveal Brown was accused of shoplifting?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the Prosecutor didn't know what the police officer(s) knew ... because it takes a week to complete the daily contact log. Oh, wait ...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)will be as revealing of DU as the TM killing.
Why do some "liberals" always seek to explain "How/Why it is reasonable to suspect that the Black guy caused his own death"; but never feel the need to explain how/why it is reasonable to suspect that the white guy caused his own death ... or pepper-spraying?
historylovr
(1,557 posts)Sadly.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)Caught red-handed after being subdued by bystanders. Killed 6 people, including a district court judge. Permanently injured US Representative Giffords.
Plead guilty to 19 counts of murder and attempted murder, serving a life sentence.
Caucasian.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)I'm trying to say we give Caucasians due process even after they murder. Even when we know the murders were premeditated.
A black kid steals and he suddenly deserves to be executed, his death ruled "acceptable."
We have some serious double standards in the application of justice. In our willingness to blithely accept summary justice based on skin tone.
Sorry I didn't explain.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)he was black, in the general area and was out late
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)This also took place in the afternoon.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Black, heavily built, 6' tall, wearing a T-shirt, brown shorts and sandals.
Wonderful! so much evidence! so convincing!
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)I'm not saying it was him but the pictures look a lot like Michael Brown.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)had not seen that video, had he? He was, according to a police chief who I regard as as being as trustworthy as Rush Limp-bough, responding to a radio message.
Nice try but - fail
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)For all we know, the description of the suspect in the radio message could have matched Michael Brown exactly. At that point, the officer had the right to stop Michael Brown. What happened after that is where answers still need to be provided.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)is a bit like Chinese whispers.
On a call out do you think for one second that the responding officer is going to write and then broadcast an essay? Just go take your simpering excuses elsewhere.
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)The clothes the robbery suspect was wearing and the clothes that the deceased was wearing appear to be an identical match. Must have been a very good verbal description. That right there is probable cause for the police to consider Michael Brown a suspect and stop him on the street. It is from that point on that we don't know what happened and still need answers for.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Are you utterly ignorant of radio protocols?
I see from posts elsewhere that the original broadcast was for a "Tall D/M wearing a white T-shirt"
What about the original police excuse for the stop that Michael Brown was walking in the middle of the street?
Really, you are simpering and making excuses for a killing.
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)As I've said previously, I don't know what happened from the time the officer stopped the deceased until the time Michael Brown was murdered. Neither does anyone else besides the officer, Dorian Johnson and Michael Brown. Unfortunately one is dead and the other two are trying to cover their asses.
All I've said is that the officer had probable cause to stop them in the street due to the match of the robbery suspect and Michael Brown.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Excuses for the actions of the police officer.
Now you say he had "probable cause" but you misuse the term because it is defined by the Constitution
Now the officer may have had suspicion but was it a reasonable suspicion? Not truly because under the original version of events given by the police Michael Brown was accosted for walking in the middle of the road not on suspicion of assault or robbery.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)How progressive of you.
So presumably anyone can be shot dead without trial on the off chance that they match the description of someone involved in a crime.
But oddly there is a legal concept that may have escaped your notice it is called "Due Process," the duty to ensure the legal rights of the person and that those rights may only be infringed after giving notice and in sufficient detail. In the case of any suspect they must be informed why they have been stopped and if they are fleeing a warning must be given. No-one claims this happened to Mr Brown.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I didnt say anything about the events after that.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Does seem to indulge in racial profiling. Certainly the original account given by the police that Michael Brown was stopped for walking down the middle of the street would leave big questions open as to the motivation of the officer.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)is it on camera that he did this? Release the convenience store tapes/recordings. Always want to make the victim the thug. Goddamn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)Too bad Michael Brown didn't play football ~~
Calling this "robbery" is insane. They imply he held up the place, not that he shoplifted a $2 item.
gvstn
(2,805 posts)I'm not sure everything this guy is saying but he does say the convenience store never reported the incident at the time. That might be important if true. I can't dissect the whole video right now.
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)gvstn
(2,805 posts)Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)The robbery supposedly took place at a different store though.
gvstn
(2,805 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)home invasion, and the theft of an ice cream cone from a toddler.
We all know what "suspect" means. There's a long road between "suspect" and "arraigned" and an even longer road between that and a verdict.
When the police decide to truncate the process by shooting a "suspect" repeatedly so they fall flat on the road with their hands over their head, there's something mighty wrong.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)You'd have told the country about That Immediately to cover your (imo) Lying asses--No matter what! This Is About His Murder! Period. Being a "suspect" does not authorize you to execute anyone.
For crying out loud-he was College Bound the following Monday! I doubt he'd risk it all shoplifting!
You are already completely Incredible-by your Own hand.
Stop Digging!
JCMach1
(27,555 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/15/the-day-ferguson-cops-wer_n_5681363.html
Police in Ferguson, Missouri, once actually charged a man with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms while four of them allegedly beat him...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)the convenience store and not about Darren Wilson.
harun
(11,348 posts)tea and oranges
(396 posts)There are no acceptable circumstances, excuses, or lies.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)....would you be walking down the middle of the street in town?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Would we try to LOCK OURSELVES IN WITH THE ROBBER? Like that guy did?
historylovr
(1,557 posts)Why?
Okay, so, let's say this young man who'd never done anything criminal before gets a wild hair and decides to rob a store a few days before he goes to college, since when is robbery a capital crime. And if the eyewitness' account is true, it doesn't sound like Officer Wilson was trying to make an arrest but instead trying to be a badass authority figure because he could. This doesn't make sense on any level.
Liberal_from_va34
(50 posts)The police are really desperate to come up with an excuse to justify this brutal act. Shameful.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)His life is not default because he has a criminal record.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)I can not view At the moment on my own! Would promote more anger if cover up is a question or obvious
jayfish
(10,039 posts)officer involved in the shooting because the investigation was ongoing and he had not been officially charged with a crime? Yet, it's a-OK to release this report, video and the name of Brown as a suspect while the investigation is ongoing and no one has been charged with a crime?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Iamthetruth
(487 posts)There are always two sides of the story and some jumped too soon.
jayfish
(10,039 posts)has been completely rewritten while the other has remained the same from day-one. This PD should have it's charter removed. It should then be designated an illegal paramilitary force, disbanded and charged with, murder, accessory to murder and incitement to riot.
Iamthetruth
(487 posts)The friend with him who said they were just walking down the street not bothering anyone left out the incident in the store? I know it may trouble some but character matters to me.
U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)Note the author of this OP http://upload.democraticunderground.com/10025379844
curious, eh?
Vinca
(50,260 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)officer and was black. In many cases across the country, people are shot because they don't obey the officer.
When you point a gun at someone, it means "If you don't do what I say, I will kill you." That's what the gun represents.
Judi Lynn
(160,515 posts)Efilroft Sul Fri Aug 15, 2014, 08:55 AM
Police identify officer, allege teen robbed store
Associated Press
By DAVID A. LIEB and ALAN SCHER ZAGIER
35 minutes ago
FERGUSON, Mo. (AP) Police on Friday identified the officer who fatally shot an unarmed black teenager and released documents alleging the young man had been suspected of stealing a $48.99 box of cigars from a convenience store in a "strong-arm" robbery shortly before he was killed.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014871469
Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,515 posts)So far it looks as if you posted your article on the same story, with a far more inflammatory headline well after his post had already been in place for some time.
On edit:
People posted on your thread because your thread replace the original one at the top of the page when you posted the same story later in the morning. It was the one they saw first, rather than the original thread.
Easy to grasp.
Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)The other one was the headline that the officer's name was revealed. Its quite easy to grasp that those are two distinct events on this story.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Saw Brown running (away from cop), witness says he saw no reason for shooting, Brown shot 7 times, first 2 shots in back, he turned around, next 5 shots in front.
Looks like the real deal from this witness to me.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)So there was really no excuse for the shooting. And last I checked, we didn't execute people for suspected shoplifting. Seriously. I do not care if Mike Brown was a straight-A student destined for Harvard or a petty criminal or somewhere in between. He did not deserve to be shot with his hands in the air. And the stinking police department who let the body bake in the sun for hours and could not be bothered to release any info on the shooter is now suddenly all about transparency? Bullshit. They know they are going to get their brains sued out and that public opinion is against them. They are trying to do damage control by painting their victim as someone who deserved to die. Don't buy it. Assholes.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)If I randomly shot someone and he happened to be a suspect in a crime somewhere, should I get a pass?