Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 04:03 AM Apr 2012

Japan should ideally phase out nuclear power: minister

Source: Reuters

Japan should aspire to phase out nuclear power completely, its energy minister said on Friday, even as the government struggles to persuade a wary public that it is safe to restart reactors after the world's worst nuclear crisis in 25 years.

<snip>

"The government's policy is now to reduce reliance on nuclear power as low as possible," Edano said, adding it should in future account for less than the third of national electricity it supplied before last year's Fukushima crisis.

<snip>

"I'd like to see the reliance on nuclear cut to zero. I'd like to have a society work without nuclear as early as possible," Edano told a news conference in energy policy.

"I myself think it should be reduced as soon as possible. But as to in reality how quickly it can be reduced or whether it will ultimately be reduced to zero - I want to judge based on discussion by experts."

<snip>

Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/46959407

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Japan should ideally phase out nuclear power: minister (Original Post) bananas Apr 2012 OP
What would they use Meiko Apr 2012 #1
they're replacing it with natural gas and oil phantom power Apr 2012 #3
Wind and Solar AndyTiedye Apr 2012 #6
they should stop eating whales also but neither will happen n/t IamK Apr 2012 #2
I'm not sure that's true. Currently, all but one of their nuke plants are shut down. phantom power Apr 2012 #4
We don't yet even know the full extent of harm Fukushima mother earth Apr 2012 #5
Rachel Maddow chervilant Apr 2012 #7
K&R. Yes please! Lead the way! Overseas Apr 2012 #8
Wow! Note this sentence. Prometheus Bound Apr 2012 #9
 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
1. What would they use
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 05:48 AM
Apr 2012

to replace nuclear with I wonder? Wind? tidal generation? The Japanese have really good technology.

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
5. We don't yet even know the full extent of harm Fukushima
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 02:50 PM
Apr 2012

caused, it is far reaching and immeasurable at this juncture. Radioactivity continues to be measured as increasing at the site.

It makes sense to realize nuclear power is incredibly risky, obviously alternatives must be made a priority.

Of course, we'll put it off until the increases in cancers become obvious and other blatant factors stare us in the face.
Everything is under control, right?

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
7. Rachel Maddow
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 09:31 PM
Apr 2012

just reported the most current information regarding Fukushima. Reactor 2 has only two feet of water covering the core, instead of the expected 33 feet of water. Enough radioactivity is leaking from Reactor 2 to kill a human in a matter of minutes. Reactor 2 is so radioactive, electronics would become inoperable almost immediately. Scientists are admitting that they will have to invent technology to 'fix' this problem.

Reactor 2 is considered the least problematic of the damaged reactors at Fukushima...

Prometheus Bound

(3,489 posts)
9. Wow! Note this sentence.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 03:15 AM
Apr 2012

Experts say the government is racing to try to restart two nuclear reactors by next month out of fear that surviving a total shutdown would make it hard to convince the public that atomic energy is vital to avoid serious power shortages.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Japan should ideally phas...