Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 09:19 AM Apr 2012

Senate Hopeful Lee Whitnum Calls Opponent ‘Whore’ at Connecticut Debate

Source: Hypervocal.com

The Democratic primary race for four-term incumbent Joe Lieberman’s open Senate seat got ugly on Thursday night. One of the five candidates at the debate accused another of being a “whore.”

Lee Whitnum, a former software engineer and author from Greenwich, Connecticut, who has been accused by the Anti-Defamation League of being an “anti-Semite,” called out Rep. Chris Murphy for his unflinching support of Israel and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobby.

“I am dealing with whore here, who sells his soul to AIPAC, who will say anything for the job,” she said about Murphy in her closing statement. No article needed. Just whore.

Whitnum had been excluded from previous debates, but she sued for the right to appear on stage. This was the first such forum she’s in which she’s been allowed to participate.

Read more: http://hypervocal.com/news/2012/senate-hopeful-lee-whitnum-calls-opponent-whore-at-connecticut-debate/



It will be great to see when this woman deservedly loses the primary.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Hopeful Lee Whitnum Calls Opponent ‘Whore’ at Connecticut Debate (Original Post) Freddie Stubbs Apr 2012 OP
Nice talk! swag Apr 2012 #1
are you familiar with her? Enrique Apr 2012 #2
Chris is a good guy, a progressive. I hope he gets the nom for the Senate run to fill old Joe's CTyankee Apr 2012 #38
Well, that remark probably did lose Whitnum the sex worker vote Ken Burch Apr 2012 #40
Sounds like "Jane, you ignorant slut" territory. Greybnk48 Apr 2012 #3
We are trying to replace an AIPAC puppet. Are you rooting for more of the same? A Simple Game Apr 2012 #8
Accusing someone who supports Israel of putting Israeli interests ahead cali Apr 2012 #18
AIPAC always seems to put Israel before the USA... rfranklin Apr 2012 #20
Is Joe Lieberman a whore then? snooper2 Apr 2012 #31
No...Joe would be more of an elderly rent boy. Ken Burch Apr 2012 #41
Damn right it's ugly language, how about treason? Is that ugly language? A Simple Game Apr 2012 #39
their religion? Ken Burch Apr 2012 #43
With a name like Murphy, wouldn't Whitnum's opponent be Irish Catholic? Ken Burch Apr 2012 #42
Whitnum IS anti-Semitic SteveHC Apr 2012 #47
Well, I can see why they don't want to let her talk. nt bemildred Apr 2012 #4
... xchrom Apr 2012 #5
Well, she may well be an anti-Semite. Surely she was foolish to use such perjoratives, but... hlthe2b Apr 2012 #6
This is her first and last debate Renew Deal Apr 2012 #7
Funny how Likudniks always play the anti-semite card when faced with opposition in the US ... TahitiNut Apr 2012 #9
I am from Connecticut and Lee Whitnum is a nut job. Chris Murphy is my Rep and will make a great truckin Apr 2012 #10
I wish people would stop doing this, whether male of female. Beacool Apr 2012 #11
Amen! (n/t) Seeking Serenity Apr 2012 #12
DEFINITION OF WHORE Skittles Apr 2012 #17
not in a political debate it ain't. She fucked herself but good. cali Apr 2012 #19
No, it isn't. Beacool Apr 2012 #21
perhaps not whoring for something is a better idea Skittles Apr 2012 #24
bravo lunasun Apr 2012 #34
Whore used to be ok here, in a certain, non-sexual context. Anyone remember MWO? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #27
I remember MWO!!! KansDem Apr 2012 #32
Full of surprises! JAbuchan08 Apr 2012 #13
No wonder nobody wanted Lee Numbwit on stage struggle4progress Apr 2012 #14
Stay classy, Lee! Oh...wait...she's an anti-Semite who calls her opponents whores! MADem Apr 2012 #15
clearly she shoots off her mouth without thinking of the consequences of that SemperEadem Apr 2012 #16
I know how this game goes: Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #22
first of all, there's virtually NO evidence that AIPAC or Israel dragged us into Iraq cali Apr 2012 #26
Are you kdding me? Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #30
yeah, but that wasn't what you charged. duh. cali Apr 2012 #33
Explain to us how she "looks like a total crank nutjob" brentspeak Apr 2012 #35
Is that the royal "we"? In any case, glad to. cali Apr 2012 #45
That's just awful RedEarth Apr 2012 #23
Lee Whitnum vs. the Jews: Democratic Senate candidate blasts U.S. policy in the Middle East Behind the Aegis Apr 2012 #25
Not me...just read her Wikipedia entry Ken Burch Apr 2012 #44
both should never be elected; one for unstability, the other for war mongering starfox172 Apr 2012 #28
instability* starfox172 Apr 2012 #29
Don't let the door slam your ass... rayofreason Apr 2012 #36
The Politicos in Wa Red1 Apr 2012 #37
sweeping generalizations are silly and no they are NOT all whores. cali Apr 2012 #46

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
2. are you familiar with her?
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 09:28 AM
Apr 2012

I just looked her up, she's quite a colorful character, used to date John Kerry. The "whore" thing doesn't bother me too much. If Chris Murphy (I never heard of him either) is owned by AIPAC or any lobby then it should be an issue in the campaign.

CTyankee

(63,900 posts)
38. Chris is a good guy, a progressive. I hope he gets the nom for the Senate run to fill old Joe's
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 04:38 PM
Apr 2012

seat. Then we'd have two strong liberals from CT in the U.S. Senate! It would go a long way to remove the stain of Joe Lieberman on our state.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
40. Well, that remark probably did lose Whitnum the sex worker vote
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:37 AM
Apr 2012

I'd guess that's a big voting bloc in some parts of the state.

Greybnk48

(10,167 posts)
3. Sounds like "Jane, you ignorant slut" territory.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 09:29 AM
Apr 2012

Funny! But she sounds horrid, if her anti-semitism is true.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
8. We are trying to replace an AIPAC puppet. Are you rooting for more of the same?
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:22 AM
Apr 2012

Anyone that puts a foreign lobby's, or foreign Country's interests ahead of the United States is automatically disqualified in my book. If that makes me anti-semitic, then I will wear the badge proudly. Personally I think it makes you Pro-American, your views may differ.

If what she says is true, she automatically goes into my plus column. Easy to say, I'm in New York, but we do have an AIPAC puppet of our own in the Senate.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
18. Accusing someone who supports Israel of putting Israeli interests ahead
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 12:57 PM
Apr 2012

of U.S. interest is straying into dangerous territory- particularly if the person you're accusing is Jewish. I'm NOT saying you're anti-semitic. I am saying that it's ugly language.

 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
20. AIPAC always seems to put Israel before the USA...
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 01:16 PM
Apr 2012

and recognizing that is not necessarily anti-semitic but she may have said other things that reveal such a bias.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
41. No...Joe would be more of an elderly rent boy.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:38 AM
Apr 2012

Not that that's better...just wanted to clarify the terms we're using here.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
39. Damn right it's ugly language, how about treason? Is that ugly language?
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:35 PM
Apr 2012

Because that's how I feel about a United States Senator that would put Israel or any other country before the US. And I don't care what their religion is! If you want to call that ugly or anti-semitic, I will wear that badge proudly! You can call the truth ugly names, but it is still the truth.

You can put their religion above patriotism, but I will not.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
43. their religion?
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:43 AM
Apr 2012

Chris Murphy is Irish Catholic...and, if you back Whitnum, you're not helping her cause with talk like that.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
42. With a name like Murphy, wouldn't Whitnum's opponent be Irish Catholic?
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:40 AM
Apr 2012

(I do agree that busting out the "w word" wasn't cool, though...)

SteveHC

(1 post)
47. Whitnum IS anti-Semitic
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 02:15 PM
Apr 2012

It isn't that she's "just" anti-Israel and "therefor" anti-Semitic. In her online writings she and a friend are careful to refrain from anti-Jewish rants. But in her *verbal* statements - publicly and otherwise - she is literally unable to control herself, clearly and repeatedly stating her bizarre fixed delusions that Jews "control the U.S. government" and indeed the whole world. And because she has plenty of time on her hands - and some money - she threatens to sue anyone who won't allow her a bully pulpit. She's a pox on the Democratic Party and should be pushed out of it; let her try to run as an "independent" if she really wants to continue to waste her time and money running for political office... preferably in Iran.

hlthe2b

(102,192 posts)
6. Well, she may well be an anti-Semite. Surely she was foolish to use such perjoratives, but...
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:11 AM
Apr 2012

Having long been concerned at the manner in which Lieberman walked that "fine line" of prioritizing support for Israel with that for the US--and convinced he not infrequently crossed it-- I think the issue is worth civil discussion.

I know nothing about this woman. She is stupid for the way in which she went about it and may be grotesquely anti-Semitic for all I know. But, I don't think that should place the issue totally off bounds. Israel's Likudists are determined to get us into a war with Iran. As we have seen with our other ill conceived ME wars, our Neocons are all too happy to use that as justification. Israel is certainly important, but I think it is wise to make sure US interests are first and foremost, IMO

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
9. Funny how Likudniks always play the anti-semite card when faced with opposition in the US ...
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:26 AM
Apr 2012

... when that opposition is FAR less vocal than they face in their own Knesset and in Israel generally. Neoconservatives seem to come from the same polluted end of the gene pool, no matter where they are spawned. I'll continue to adhere to the "reality-based" viewpoints as exemplified in Tikkun.

The capos offering Jews bars of soap as they entered the gas chambers were NOT being generous. We should be VERY cautious what we call "support."


truckin

(576 posts)
10. I am from Connecticut and Lee Whitnum is a nut job. Chris Murphy is my Rep and will make a great
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:27 AM
Apr 2012

Senator. While I support most Democratic candidates, Congressman Murphy, 5th District Connecticut, is one of the few I contribute money to and will work for. He is young, smart, well spoken, hard working, progressive, and as far as I can tell, honest. This is a rare combination these days and I expect great things from Chris.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
11. I wish people would stop doing this, whether male of female.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:30 AM
Apr 2012

I wish that candidates stopped the gratuitous name calling. It's inappropriate and offensive.

Skittles

(153,138 posts)
17. DEFINITION OF WHORE
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 12:42 PM
Apr 2012

A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores. 1.

If you can get your mind out of the gutter, the word WHORE is legitimate

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
21. No, it isn't.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 01:29 PM
Apr 2012

It's disrespectful. There is no reason to state a position by calling an opponent a whore. There are plenty of other words that one can use.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
27. Whore used to be ok here, in a certain, non-sexual context. Anyone remember MWO?
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 02:18 PM
Apr 2012

Does Media Whores Online ring a bell with anyone? Do you remember their Whore of the Year award? There are people who "whore" for industry, or for politicians, or for other groups--they sell their soul for lucre, in other words. If "whore" in this context is no longer acceptable here, well, ok. But when uttered or written in the way I've described, there's just not a sexual connotation to it.

JAbuchan08

(3,046 posts)
13. Full of surprises!
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:45 AM
Apr 2012

Firstly I was shocked that this was a Democratic primary race.
Secondly I was surprised that this was a woman calling a man a whore.

I don't think that is appropriate language for a candidates debate, but their needs to be some discussion about the role of AIPAC and other like groups on our foreign policy, and of the anti-defamation league silencing said debate.
Having said that I don't know why they called her an "anti-semite" so it may have been appropriate, but it seems to me that the anti-semite lable is often applied with a really broad-brush.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
15. Stay classy, Lee! Oh...wait...she's an anti-Semite who calls her opponents whores!
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 11:20 AM
Apr 2012

I guess classy has left the building in her case...!

She looks a bit stressed out in the photo they attached to the article.



I have to wonder who on the GOP team is paying her to do this? Or is she just operating in a reality that doesn't include progressive ideals?

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
16. clearly she shoots off her mouth without thinking of the consequences of that
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 11:25 AM
Apr 2012

she may have a good point, but it's forever lost in the fact that everyone is scrambling on the floor trying to snatch up their pearls because they clutched them too hard when she dropped the "W" bomb.

She could have easily have said "you're bought and paid for by AIPAC"--it would have meant the same and the ensuing clusterf(*&*( would not materialized.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
22. I know how this game goes:
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 01:51 PM
Apr 2012

She is a strong critic of AIPAC, so she must be smeared as an anti-Semite.

She criticized AIPAC for its role in dragging us into the Iraq war crime.

She said the US should not have invaded Afghanistan.

Here's the Wikipedia page about her: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Whitnum

I don't see anything anti-semitic; I do see strong criticism of Israel and AIPAC.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
26. first of all, there's virtually NO evidence that AIPAC or Israel dragged us into Iraq
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 02:13 PM
Apr 2012

secondly, she looks like a total crank nutjob.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
30. Are you kdding me?
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 02:37 PM
Apr 2012

They didn't have to drag Bush, but they cheer led it all the way.

secondly, are you dissing this Democratic candidate because of her appearance in an unflattering photo? There's a much nicer photo of her on the Wikipedia page.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
33. yeah, but that wasn't what you charged. duh.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 03:28 PM
Apr 2012

and no, I'm not dissing her because of her appearance. how fucking ridiculous. I'm dissing her because I read the her wiki page.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
45. Is that the royal "we"? In any case, glad to.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 06:21 AM
Apr 2012

Her calling on Blumenthal to resign over AIG was nutty, dear. Her absurd lawsuit against Malloy was nutty- and of course it was dismissed. And then there's this batshit lawsuit:

In November of 2011 she filed a Federal lawsuit against the Town of Greenwich and Peter Tesei, First Selectman for allowing a Bar Mitzvah at the Town Hall citing the First Amendment Establishment Clause.[13] Whitnum repeatedly approached the ACLU to take her case against the Town of Greenwich. In January of 2011 she finally received a rejection from the ACLU citing too much case load. In a press release Whitnum accused the ACLU of being a biased organization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Whitnum
http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/Town-Democrat-files-lawsuit-over-bar-mitzvah-at-2171280.php

And just what does she mean by accusing the ACLU of being biased?

Then there's this bit of nutjobbery.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/lee-whitnum-to-expatriate-dual-citizen-israeli-ame/

Behind the Aegis

(53,936 posts)
25. Lee Whitnum vs. the Jews: Democratic Senate candidate blasts U.S. policy in the Middle East
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 02:13 PM
Apr 2012
As many members of Connecticut’s Jewish community see it, Lee Whitnum isn’t just anti-Israel, she’s antisemitic.
As Whitnum herself sees it, however, she’s simply “clear-headed and purposeful.”

Whitnum is one of six Democrats vying for the Senate seat to be vacated by Joe Lieberman at the end of the year.
An outspoken critic of AIPAC, the Greenwich resident has grabbed headlines with her unabashed proclamations against U.S. support of Israel and the policies of individual lawmakers. Many of her comments use blatantly anti-Jewish and anti-Israel rhetoric, though Whitnum and her supporters deny that she is antisemitic.

Whitnum has filed legal complaints against bloggers and politicians who claim that she is racist. A recent defamation lawsuit filed against Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy was thrown out last month in the Stamford Superior Court.

On Mar. 23, the Connecticut Democratic Party held its annual Jefferson Jackson Bailey Dinner at the Connecticut Convention Center in Hartford. Outside the event, Whitnum and a group of some 20 supporters distributed a manifesto-type document addressed to “Democratic leaders.” Whitnum later entered the Convention Center to hand out copies of the screed. The Ledger later learned that several attendees lodged complaints with the Connecticut regional office of the Anti-Defamation League.

The manifesto targets Senators Richard Blumenthal and Joe Lieberman, accusing them of inappropriate and conspiratorial ties to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his policies.

http://www.jewishledger.com/2012/04/lee-whitnum-vs-the-jews-democratic-senate-candidate-blasts-u-s-policy-in-the-middle-east/


Anti-Defamation League: Whitnum used Anti-Semitic Language

We received a number of complaints about our interview with Democrat Lee Whitnum last week on Face the State. As a candidate for the U.S. Senate, we invited Whitnum on the program as we have every candidate competing for a party nomination.

Whitnum’s comments about Israel, on Face the State and in other venues, have led some to accuse her of being anti-semitic. In fact, Whitnum is currently suing Governor Dannel Malloy, alleging he called her an anti-semite. We asked the Anti-Defamation League of Connecticut to watch and analyze our interview, and here’s what the organization had to say:

In our opinion, Ms. Whitnum invoked anti-Semitic canards, including allegations of Jewish control and accusations of dual loyalty. As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, ADL is strictly non-partisan, and does not endorse or oppose candidates for office.

You can watch the interview right here: http://dennishouse.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/whitnum-blasts-bysiewicz-and-murphy/

In addition to her lawsuit against Governor Malloy, Whitnum is also involved in other legal proceedings. Her case against the Norwich Bulletin is now in federal court to be heard today in New Haven. Whitnum is suing to be included in an upcoming Bulletin senate debate. Next week, Whitnum is due in court for a lawsuit she filed against the author of the My Left Nutmeg blog. She also filed lawsuits against Yahoo and the town of Greenwich.

http://dennishouse.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/anti-defamation-league-whitnum-used-anti-semitic-language/


Whitnum Blasts Bysiewicz, Murphy and Malloy

In her first television interview of the campaign, Lee Whitnum came out swinging against two of her fellow Democrats seeking the nomination for the seat currently held by Joe Lieberman. During a taping of Face the State, the lawyer and author from Greenwich was highly critical of Susan Bysiewicz and Chris Murphy.

On Bysiewicz, here is an excerpt of what Whitnum had to say: “I don’t like her at all. I think she is a card-carrying Israelist.” Is she running to make sure this Congress remains pro-Israel?”

As for Murphy:

“Chris Murphy pledged $30M to Israel over the next ten years……..We elected a young maverick kid and he just hasn’t done very much. He needs to be taken out of office.”

Whitnum hasn’t made many friends in the Connecticut Democratic Party. She is currently suing Governor Malloy, alleging he called her an anti-semite. In the interview, Whitnum said the governor (who has publicly talked about his dyslexia) can’t read. In the past she has called Senator Lieberman a traitor, and demanded Senator Richard Blumenthal resign.

http://dennishouse.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/whitnum-blasts-bysiewicz-and-murphy/


She will get some supporters.
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
44. Not me...just read her Wikipedia entry
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:47 AM
Apr 2012

Whitnum is clearly a nut job. She'll flame out in this primary...has "batshit perennial candidate" written all over...in ACTUAL bat shit, most likely.

 

Red1

(351 posts)
37. The Politicos in Wa
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 04:37 PM
Apr 2012

Are all 'whores'....the problem is support for the men and women in this country is now dependent on people who are looking for their next blow job rather than next helping hand for us..and we need one too..

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
46. sweeping generalizations are silly and no they are NOT all whores.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 06:23 AM
Apr 2012

In fact not one member of my congressional delegation is one. they're all pretty damn admirable:

Bernie Sanders
Pat Leahy
Peter Welch

and their are other good reps and Senators. Not enough, but they exist.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Hopeful Lee Whitnu...