Civil Rights Groups Appeal Dismissal of Ethics Complaint Against Judge Edith Jones
Source: RH Reality Check
by Jessica Mason Pieklo, Senior Legal Analyst
A panel of federal judges in Washington D.C. dismissed an ethics complaint against Edith Jones of the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, finding there wasnt enough evidence to conclude Jones had publicly made discriminatory statements and improperly discussed pending death penalty cases.
A coalition of civil rights organizations filed the misconduct complaint against Jones in June 2013 after Jones delivered a lecture at the University of Pennsylvania entitled Federal Death Penalty Review. During that lecture, Jones allegedly made a series of comments that demonstrated bias against minorities and individuals with disabilities.
Some of those comments included claims that certain racial groups like African-Americans and Hispanics are predisposed to crime and are prone to commit acts of violence including more violent and heinous crimes and that Mexicans would prefer to be on death row in the United States than serving prison terms in their native country, according to the complaint.
Jones allegedly accused defendants who raise claims of mental retardation of abusing the system and called claims the death penalty is racist or arbitrary a red herring.
FULL story at link.
A panel of federal appeals court judges found there was not enough evidence to prove Judge Edith Jones made improper discriminatory statements during a 2013 lecture. (The Richard Fowler Show/Youtube)
Read more: http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2014/10/16/civil-rights-groups-appeal-dismissal-ethics-complaint-judge-edith-jones/
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)WTF does it take?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)she didn't say:
And, she didn't:
allegedly accuse those Ret@#$s defendants who raise claims of mental retardation of abusing the system and call N!@@er claims that the death penalty is racist or arbitrary is a red herring.
So, nope ... nothing racist there!