Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 08:12 PM Oct 2014

Israeli analyst confirms link between Israel, “moderate” Syrian rebels

Source: Al-Akhbar English

Commentators have questioned why al-Nusra front or Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) have not targeted Israel in their attacks.

ISIS chief Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who leads the militant group’s self-proclaimed caliphate in parts of Iraq and Syria, spoke in July about the terror inflicted on Palestine, but he did so only in passing, in the wider context of the terror Muslims face around the world.

In June, ISIS responded to questions about why it wasn’t fighting Israel instead of killing people in Iraq and Syria.

“We haven’t given orders to kill the Israelis and the Jews,” the organization said on Twitter. “The war against the nearer enemy, those who rebel against the faith, is more important. Allah commands us in the Qur’an to fight the hypocrites, because they are much more dangerous than those who are fundamentally heretics.

Read more: http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/22065

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israeli analyst confirms link between Israel, “moderate” Syrian rebels (Original Post) shaayecanaan Oct 2014 OP
Israel would hand ISIL their asses seveneyes Oct 2014 #1
if it's so easy for Israel to destroy ISIS Enrique Oct 2014 #26
Uh Huh... The Mossad at work LiberalArkie Oct 2014 #2
Yeah, right DavidDvorkin Oct 2014 #8
Yup...those evil mossad. Rhinodawg Oct 2014 #20
I mean, does it ever stop? PCIntern Oct 2014 #21
Some people like it better when jews were sheep. Rhinodawg Oct 2014 #22
I remember after the 67 War, PCIntern Oct 2014 #23
One needs to read the whole article. A tacit truce between Israel and Al Nusra. How convenient. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2014 #3
"Tacit truces" seem to exist on all sides, as long as it is convenient. Assad and ISIS had one until pampango Oct 2014 #15
and why should I believe Al-Akhbar which is a newspaper which supports resistance against Israel? still_one Oct 2014 #4
Why would you believe Western newspapers that supported the invasion of Iraq? shaayecanaan Oct 2014 #10
this paper supports Assad, and I question it. this is posted as LBN still_one Oct 2014 #12
Well, in that case, you need only click on the story referenced within the article shaayecanaan Oct 2014 #13
ME politics is not for babies or the faint of heart. aquart Oct 2014 #17
Source: Al-Akhbar English oberliner Oct 2014 #5
It is also a pro Assad paper still_one Oct 2014 #7
You're big on repetition aren't you? (nt) shaayecanaan Oct 2014 #14
am I responding to you? still_one Oct 2014 #16
Clearly (nt) shaayecanaan Oct 2014 #24
lol, you got me still_one Oct 2014 #25
That's an unintentional hoot! Comrade Grumpy Oct 2014 #18
Everybody and everything in the middle east is linked cheapdate Oct 2014 #6
+1 freshwest Oct 2014 #11
"Israeli Satellites Guide Arab Warplanes Over Iraq" EX500rider Oct 2014 #9
How does a satellite spend most of its time over the middle east daleo Oct 2014 #19

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
26. if it's so easy for Israel to destroy ISIS
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 05:49 AM
Oct 2014

then why aren't they doing it for us, their closest ally?

LiberalArkie

(15,713 posts)
2. Uh Huh... The Mossad at work
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 08:57 PM
Oct 2014

There is a photo that is about 10 years old of Palestinian protestors with RPG's marching and 2 of the guys shirts opened up a little too much and they had star of David on their necklaces. I always wondered.

DavidDvorkin

(19,473 posts)
8. Yeah, right
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 11:35 PM
Oct 2014

As if they'd be wearing that beneath their shirts. Any such picture was obviously Photoshopped or otherwise fake.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
21. I mean, does it ever stop?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:02 PM
Oct 2014

You know, I think it drives some people crazy that there are strong, take-no-bullshit Jews out there. We are just supposed to walk quietly into the camps, right?

 

Rhinodawg

(2,219 posts)
22. Some people like it better when jews were sheep.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:10 PM
Oct 2014

since its not pc to hate jews, people make up shit to make themselves feel good.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
23. I remember after the 67 War,
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:16 PM
Oct 2014

there were many who were aghast that the Jews would have the temerity to actually fight the Pan-Arabists. By and large, their POV didn't make it into what we now call the MSM. But they were there…and they still are.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
15. "Tacit truces" seem to exist on all sides, as long as it is convenient. Assad and ISIS had one until
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 07:52 AM
Oct 2014

the later decided to break it.

I suppose it makes sense that Assad viewed ISIS as less of a threat to his rule since the world views them as more repressive than him. And for a while ISIS was concentrated on fighting other opposition groups rather than his army so there was something in it for both of them.

Israel apparently views al Nusra and other factions of the Syrian opposition as less of a threat than ISIS. It is intriguing how governments in the region pick "allies" then shift their "alliances" depending on how the fight is going and who is the "enemy of my enemy" at the moment.

still_one

(92,136 posts)
4. and why should I believe Al-Akhbar which is a newspaper which supports resistance against Israel?
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 09:06 PM
Oct 2014

I would want to see a more unbiased source before I would consider its validity

Incidently, the newspaper is pro-Assad



shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
10. Why would you believe Western newspapers that supported the invasion of Iraq?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:03 AM
Oct 2014

I wouldn't recommend accepting any source uncritically. Personally, I recommend reading sources from various points of view, it helps in filtering out the 95% that isn't true.

still_one

(92,136 posts)
12. this paper supports Assad, and I question it. this is posted as LBN
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 07:09 AM
Oct 2014

And until the story is confirmed, I remain skeptical

Western news is not the subject of this thread

I question the reliability of this particular newspaper

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
13. Well, in that case, you need only click on the story referenced within the article
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 07:36 AM
Oct 2014

and it takes you through to the original WINEP/AIPAC article posted on Business Insider:-

"Israel Is Cautiously Arming Syria's Rebels — And Has A Fragile Unspoken Truce With An Al Qaeda Affiliate"

Read more: http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/tough-dilemma-in-southern-syria#When:20:35:21Z#ixzz3GUmdJKJP

So there you go, a story with impeccably white Western credentials. You can now go to bed and sleep the quiet sleep of the saved.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
17. ME politics is not for babies or the faint of heart.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:53 PM
Oct 2014

Israel has, over the years, also been involved in training Kurdish fighters.

They want to stay alive so, like everyone else in the region, they constantly re-evaluate the situation.

Be damned dumb if they didn't.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. Source: Al-Akhbar English
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 09:13 PM
Oct 2014

This is a news source based in Lebanon. Lebanon has a very particular relationship with Syria. Reporters without Borders notes that Lebanon is a place "where the media serve as the propaganda outlets of businessmen and politicians".

http://rsf.org/index2014/en-middle-east.php

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
18. That's an unintentional hoot!
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:07 PM
Oct 2014

Lebanon certainly isn't the only place "where the media serve as the propaganda outlets of businessmen and politicians."

Wait, did you say something? I couldn't hear you over the din of CNBC, MSNBC, GE-NBC, CNN, Fox, Fox Business, the Wall Street Journal, and all the rest.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
6. Everybody and everything in the middle east is linked
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 09:36 PM
Oct 2014

to everybody and everything else in the middle east. Pull any thread and it brings up a hopeless tangle.

EX500rider

(10,839 posts)
9. "Israeli Satellites Guide Arab Warplanes Over Iraq"
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 12:13 AM
Oct 2014
It was recently revealed that Israel had quietly and anonymously contributed some vital targeting information for the air campaign against ISIL in Iraq (and possibly Syria as well). It wasn't that the U.S. doesn't have spy satellites that could have provided this, but the Israeli fleet of spy satellites does not have worldwide responsibilities and spend most of their time over Middle Eastern nations and have been doing so for a long time. Thus the Israelis had satellite data right now that it would take weeks, months or longer for American satellites to compile. The Israeli contribution were kept quiet and Israeli data had been “scrubbed” to remove any evidence that it was from Israel. But none of the Arab nations contributing warplanes to the operation were surprised and, except for Iran (which openly insists ISIL is an invention of the Americans, British and Israel) no one complained.

Israel admits to having seven reconnaissance satellites in orbit (Ofek 5, 7, 9 and 10 military photo satellites, a radar satellite and two commercial photo satellites). The oldest of these is the Ofek 5, which has been in service since 2002. The latest launch was in April 2014 when the 400 kg (880 pound) Ofek 10, went up. It used the same Shavit 2 type launcher that sent the similar Ofek 9 into orbit in 2010. Ofek 9 had sensors able to see objects as small as 55 cm/twenty inches and the Ofek 10 sensors are believed to be even more precise.


http://strategypage.com/htmw/htintel/articles/20141017.aspx

daleo

(21,317 posts)
19. How does a satellite spend most of its time over the middle east
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:22 PM
Oct 2014

Unless it is in geosynchronous orbit? And if spy satellites were at 40,000 km, the resolution would be compromised, as far as visual spying is concerned, I would think.

That being said, I suppose a fleet of seven low Earth satellies could be arranged so that at least on was over the Middle East at any given time.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Israeli analyst confirms ...