Court rejects appeal over Senate filibuster rules
Source: AP-EXCITE
WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a public interest group and four members of Congress who challenged the Senate filibuster as unconstitutional.
The justices let stand a lower court ruling that said Common Cause and the lawmakers did not have legal standing to pursue the case.
The plaintiffs argued that Senate rules requiring at least 60 votes to bring legislation to a vote violates the constitutional principle of majority rule. A federal appeals court said the lawsuit was filed against the wrong parties.
The case was brought against Vice President Joe Biden in his role as president of the Senate, and against the Senate's secretary, parliamentarian and sergeant at arms.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141103/us-supreme-court-filibusters-c249a3d3ae.html
gerogie2
(450 posts)going to attempt to set the rules of the Congress. Was this a lawyer employment act by those boneheaded litigants?
longship
(40,416 posts)This is an easy call.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)The Constitution says that Congress gets to set its rules.
And unless the rule is explicitly discriminatory, such as "only male senators can vote", then the courts are not going to get involved.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,076 posts)... I just love all the, "edumacting", that goes on at this site. Seriously.
FBaggins
(26,728 posts)There is no "constitutional principle of majority rule".
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)We just have to realize we have set a precedent with the change in rules. As soon as the Republicans get control of the Senate (God forbid it happens again in my lifetime), we all know they will do it.