Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,582 posts)
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 03:06 PM Nov 2014

Court rejects appeal over Senate filibuster rules

Source: AP-EXCITE

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a public interest group and four members of Congress who challenged the Senate filibuster as unconstitutional.

The justices let stand a lower court ruling that said Common Cause and the lawmakers did not have legal standing to pursue the case.

The plaintiffs argued that Senate rules requiring at least 60 votes to bring legislation to a vote violates the constitutional principle of majority rule. A federal appeals court said the lawsuit was filed against the wrong parties.

The case was brought against Vice President Joe Biden in his role as president of the Senate, and against the Senate's secretary, parliamentarian and sergeant at arms.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141103/us-supreme-court-filibusters-c249a3d3ae.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rejects appeal over Senate filibuster rules (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2014 OP
The courts are not... gerogie2 Nov 2014 #1
Yup! The constitution is pretty clear on who makes the rules in congress. longship Nov 2014 #2
who they ought to sue is harry reid belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #3
That'll also lose. jeff47 Nov 2014 #4
+1 ... IthinkThereforeIAM Nov 2014 #7
They would have lost even if they had standing FBaggins Nov 2014 #5
The Senate could change the rule at any time with a simple majority. PoliticAverse Nov 2014 #6
It's the right outcome davidpdx Nov 2014 #8
 

gerogie2

(450 posts)
1. The courts are not...
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 03:14 PM
Nov 2014

going to attempt to set the rules of the Congress. Was this a lawyer employment act by those boneheaded litigants?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. That'll also lose.
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 03:50 PM
Nov 2014

The Constitution says that Congress gets to set its rules.

And unless the rule is explicitly discriminatory, such as "only male senators can vote", then the courts are not going to get involved.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
8. It's the right outcome
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 12:07 AM
Nov 2014

We just have to realize we have set a precedent with the change in rules. As soon as the Republicans get control of the Senate (God forbid it happens again in my lifetime), we all know they will do it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court rejects appeal over...