Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,494 posts)
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 10:19 PM Nov 2014

Secret Service chief: Morale suffering at agency

Source: AP-Excite

WASHINGTON (AP) — The acting director of the Secret Service warned lawmakers Wednesday of "potentially dire consequences" from lowered morale and operational security at the agency. He vowed to do better.

Joseph Clancy offered the sobering assessment in testimony to the House Judiciary Committee, making his first appearance on Capitol Hill since his appointment last month to lead the embattled agency. The Secret Service has suffered a string of embarrassments, including a fence jumper who made it into the White House, which led to the resignation of its previous director.

Clancy acknowledged that the agency has fallen short of its goal of perfection. He said that being in the spotlight has had detrimental effects on employee morale and operational security, "both with potentially dire consequences."

He also offered a mea culpa over the Sept. 19 fence-jumping incident. An internal review last week detailed a string of failures that allowed a Texas Army veteran, Omar Gonzalez, to make it way all the way into the East Room.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141119/us--congress-secret_service-74c4d6bad4.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Secret Service chief: Morale suffering at agency (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2014 OP
Morale down? Embarrassed? DO YOUR JOB! Agent on personal cellphone? No. CurtEastPoint Nov 2014 #1
Usually . . . markpkessinger Nov 2014 #5
At what point did LiberalElite Nov 2014 #2
one former member said it was during the Bush administration when it came under JI7 Nov 2014 #3
you mean that massive new bureaucracy that Bush created? RussBLib Nov 2014 #4
This Has to be True Oldtimeralso Nov 2014 #7
Quick, send in the prostitutes. nt OnyxCollie Nov 2014 #6

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
5. Usually . . .
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 11:03 PM
Nov 2014

. . . when standards slip and morale in an organization suffers, the problem can be traced to faulty management.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
3. one former member said it was during the Bush administration when it came under
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 10:42 PM
Nov 2014

a different agency during the whole homeland security terrorism stuff.

i think before it was under the treasury department.

so they need to move it back.

Oldtimeralso

(1,935 posts)
7. This Has to be True
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 01:52 AM
Nov 2014

I should know as I had significant dealings with the Secret Service in 1996.
No, I was on the side of the good guys

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Secret Service chief: Mor...