Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 05:55 AM Nov 2014

Malarkey on the Potomac By Andrew J. Bacevich

Five Bedrock Washington Assumptions That Are Hot Air

“Iraq no longer exists.” My young friend M, sipping a cappuccino, is deadly serious. We are sitting in a scruffy restaurant across the street from the Cathedral of St. John the Divine on Manhattan’s Upper West Side. It’s been years since we’ve last seen each another. It may be years before our paths cross again. As if to drive his point home, M repeats himself: “Iraq just doesn’t exist.”

His is an opinion grounded in experience. As an enlisted soldier, he completed two Iraq tours, serving as a member of a rifle company, before and during the famous Petraeus “surge.” After separating from the Army, he went on to graduate school where he is now writing a dissertation on insurgencies. Choosing the American war in Iraq as one of his cases, M has returned there to continue his research. Indeed, he was heading back again that very evening. As a researcher, his perch provides him with an excellent vantage point for taking stock of the ongoing crisis, now that the Islamic State, or IS, has made it impossible for Americans to sustain the pretense that the Iraq War ever ended.

Few in Washington would endorse M’s assertion, of course. Inside the Beltway, policymakers, politicians, and pundits take Iraq’s existence for granted. Many can even locate it on a map. They also take for granted the proposition that it is incumbent upon the United States to preserve that existence. To paraphrase Chris Hedges, for a certain group of Americans, Iraq is the cause that gives life meaning. For the military-industrial complex, it’s the gift that keeps on giving.

Considered from this perspective, the “Iraqi government” actually governs, the “Iraqi army” is a nationally representative fighting force, and the “Iraqi people” genuinely see themselves as constituting a community with a shared past and an imaginable future.

http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175926/tomgram%3A_andrew_bacevich%2C_daydream_believers
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Malarkey on the Potomac By Andrew J. Bacevich (Original Post) bemildred Nov 2014 OP
Worth a quote from Tom's introduction to Bacevich's excellent article: KoKo Nov 2014 #1
I'm still waiting to see who will get to re-occupy Anbar province. bemildred Nov 2014 #2

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
1. Worth a quote from Tom's introduction to Bacevich's excellent article:
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:21 PM
Nov 2014

Tom:

But here's a question: After 13 years of the war on terror, with terror running rampant, isn’t a name change in order? A simple transformation of a single preposition would bring that name into greater sync with reality: the war for terror.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. I'm still waiting to see who will get to re-occupy Anbar province.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:29 PM
Nov 2014

Until they have thought that through, they should not be looking to fight at all, because that's what happens when you "win".

But yeah, an excellent article, I have come to be fond of Bacevich, he is a level head in a world full of hysteria.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Malarkey on the Potomac B...