Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Malarkey on the Potomac By Andrew J. Bacevich
Five Bedrock Washington Assumptions That Are Hot AirIraq no longer exists. My young friend M, sipping a cappuccino, is deadly serious. We are sitting in a scruffy restaurant across the street from the Cathedral of St. John the Divine on Manhattans Upper West Side. Its been years since weve last seen each another. It may be years before our paths cross again. As if to drive his point home, M repeats himself: Iraq just doesnt exist.
His is an opinion grounded in experience. As an enlisted soldier, he completed two Iraq tours, serving as a member of a rifle company, before and during the famous Petraeus surge. After separating from the Army, he went on to graduate school where he is now writing a dissertation on insurgencies. Choosing the American war in Iraq as one of his cases, M has returned there to continue his research. Indeed, he was heading back again that very evening. As a researcher, his perch provides him with an excellent vantage point for taking stock of the ongoing crisis, now that the Islamic State, or IS, has made it impossible for Americans to sustain the pretense that the Iraq War ever ended.
Few in Washington would endorse Ms assertion, of course. Inside the Beltway, policymakers, politicians, and pundits take Iraqs existence for granted. Many can even locate it on a map. They also take for granted the proposition that it is incumbent upon the United States to preserve that existence. To paraphrase Chris Hedges, for a certain group of Americans, Iraq is the cause that gives life meaning. For the military-industrial complex, its the gift that keeps on giving.
Considered from this perspective, the Iraqi government actually governs, the Iraqi army is a nationally representative fighting force, and the Iraqi people genuinely see themselves as constituting a community with a shared past and an imaginable future.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175926/tomgram%3A_andrew_bacevich%2C_daydream_believers
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1355 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Malarkey on the Potomac By Andrew J. Bacevich (Original Post)
bemildred
Nov 2014
OP
KoKo
(84,711 posts)1. Worth a quote from Tom's introduction to Bacevich's excellent article:
Tom:
But here's a question: After 13 years of the war on terror, with terror running rampant, isnt a name change in order? A simple transformation of a single preposition would bring that name into greater sync with reality: the war for terror.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. I'm still waiting to see who will get to re-occupy Anbar province.
Until they have thought that through, they should not be looking to fight at all, because that's what happens when you "win".
But yeah, an excellent article, I have come to be fond of Bacevich, he is a level head in a world full of hysteria.