Details of how U.S. rebuked foreign regimes while using same torture methods
Details of how U.S. rebuked foreign regimes while using same torture methods
December 11, 2014
Author(s): James Ross
Published in: Reuters
So the CIA doesnt consider waterboarding mock execution by near drowning to be torture, but the U.S. State Department does.
State Department reports from 2003 to 2007 concluded that Sri Lankas use of near-drowning of detainees was among methods of torture. Its reports on Tunisia from 1996 to 2004 classified submersion of the head in water as torture. In fact, the U.S. military hasprosecuted variants of waterboarding for more than 100 years going back to the U.S. occupation of the Philippines in the early 1900s.
If you want to know whether the U.S. government considers the enhanced interrogation techniques described in the Senate Intelligence Committees report summary on the CIAs interrogation program to be torture, you could read President Barack Obamas 2009 statement rejecting the use of waterboarding or you could click on the State Departments annual Country Reports on human rights conditions. It turns out that all those methods carried out by the CIA would be torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment if committed by other governments.
The grotesque and previously unreported anal feeding and anal rehydration discussed in the Senate report may not have been used elsewhere, but the State Department has reported on analogous sexual assault of prisoners as a form of torture. Its 2012 report on Syria described as custodial torture the forcing of objects into the rectum.
More:
http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/12/11/details-how-us-rebuked-foreign-regimes-while-using-same-torture-methods