Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Soaking the Poor, State by State
http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/02/soaking-poor-state-stateYou have heard, perhaps, that rich people in America are egregiously overtaxed. And the poor? They're the lucky duckies! Why, 47 percent of Americans pay no taxes at all!
(This is not true, of course. Many poor and elderly Americans pay no federal income tax, but they pay plenty of other taxes.)
Still and all, it's true that the federal income tax is indeed progressive. Conservatives are right about thatthough it's not as progressive as it used to be, back before top marginal rates were lowered and capital gains taxes were slashed in half. But conservatives are a little less excited to talk about other kinds of taxes. Payroll taxes aren't progressive, for example. In fact, they're actively regressive, with the poor and middle classes paying higher rates than the rich.
And then there are state taxes. Those include state income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and fees of various kinds. How progressive are state taxes?
Answer: They aren't. The Corporation for Enterprise Development recently released a scorecard for all 50 states, and it has boatloads of useful information. That includes overall tax rates, where CFED's number crunchers conclude that in the median state (Mississippi, as it turns out) the poorest 20 percent pay twice the tax rate of the top 1 percent. In the worst states, the poorest 20 percent pay five to six times the rate of the richest 1 percent. Lucky duckies indeed. There's not one single state with a tax system that's progressive. Click the link to see how your state scores.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1605 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Soaking the Poor, State by State (Original Post)
xchrom
Feb 2012
OP
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)1. Says it all, doesn't it? Thanks xchrom. K&R n/t
marmar
(77,077 posts)2. Truly pathetic.
nt
liberalhistorian
(20,816 posts)3. Holy shit! My God, that is absolutely
unbelievable, inexcusable, beyond disgusting. No words.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)5. bookmarking.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)6. This is the dirty little secret that flat taxers and "fair" taxers
don't want to discuss. On the state and local level, taxes are regressive. Sales taxes by their very nature, are regressive. It is basic math and yet so many Americans get bamboozled by the right wing tax policy talking points.
Great post, xchrom. I am bookmarking for future use.