Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,525 posts)
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:19 PM Apr 2015

They Have ‘Propaganda,’ US Has ‘Public Diplomacy’–and a Servile Private Sector

Published on Friday, April 17, 2015

by Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)

They Have ‘Propaganda,’ US Has ‘Public Diplomacy’–and a Servile Private Sector

by Jim Naureckas


[font size=1]
A classic example of the private sector “countering propaganda.”
[/font]
The New York Times headline (4/15/15) paints a dire picture:


Turmoil at Voice of America Is Seen as Hurting US Ability to Counter Propaganda

But wait a second–isn’t Voice of America itself a propaganda outlet? Not in the New York Times stylebook, apparently. The piece, by Ron Nixon, describes VOA as “the government agency that is charged with presenting America’s viewpoint to the world.” Later on, the Times refers to what it calls “America’s public diplomacy.”

The US’s enemies, on the other hand, have “sophisticated propaganda machines that have expanded the influence of countries like China and Russia and terrorist groups like the Islamic State.” The difference between “propaganda machines” and “public diplomacy” is never explained in the article, but the former appears to be what “they” do while the latter is what “we” do.

The only source quoted in the article who’s not directly connected to the government is Glen Howard, president of the Jamestown Foundation, described as “a Washington think tank.” (“We are getting our butts kicked…. Countries like Russia are running circles around us,” Howard says.) Not mentioned is the fact that Jamestown was founded with the help of then-CIA Director William Casey to provide financial support for the Agency’s spies (Washington Post, 1/10/05).

The article reports that since the Cold War, which it helped win by “providing unfiltered news to dissidents and countering communist propaganda in the Soviet Union and Soviet-backed countries,” VOA has been “pulled between providing credible news and supporting American policy.” Congressional Republicans want to

revise the Voice of America’s charter to state explicitly that the agency has a role in supporting American “public diplomacy” and countering propaganda from other countries.

More:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/04/17/they-have-propaganda-us-has-public-diplomacy-and-servile-private-sector
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They Have ‘Propaganda,’ US Has ‘Public Diplomacy’–and a Servile Private Sector (Original Post) Judi Lynn Apr 2015 OP
Conelrad always has lots of goodies MisterP Apr 2015 #1
It couldn't be any more right! Here's a website to make a person feel he/she's right at home again. Judi Lynn Apr 2015 #2

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
1. Conelrad always has lots of goodies
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:08 AM
Apr 2015
http://conelrad.com/index.php
I like the section on proving that someone was a pinko because they were feor race-mixing

Judi Lynn

(160,525 posts)
2. It couldn't be any more right! Here's a website to make a person feel he/she's right at home again.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 08:00 PM
Apr 2015

Who wouldn't give anything to hear "Get That Communist, Joe?"

Now we can fill up on all the right things as food for thought.

We need this site to help us be prepared!

Thanks for the link for true believers. Looks like a winner, and winning is really all that matters.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»They Have ‘Propaganda,’ U...