Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 11:55 PM Feb 2012

Krugman: 'Something has clearly gone very wrong with modern American conservatism'

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/opinion/krugman-severe-conservative-syndrome.html

... As Molly Ball of The Atlantic pointed out, Mr. Romney “described conservatism as if it were a disease.” Indeed. Mark Liberman, a linguistics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, provided a list of words that most commonly follow the adverb “severely”; the top five, in frequency of use, are disabled, depressed, ill, limited and injured.

That’s clearly not what Mr. Romney meant to convey. Yet if you look at the race for the G.O.P. presidential nomination, you have to wonder whether it was a Freudian slip. For something has clearly gone very wrong with modern American conservatism.

... My short answer is that the long-running con game of economic conservatives and the wealthy supporters they serve finally went bad. For decades the G.O.P. has won elections by appealing to social and racial divisions, only to turn after each victory to deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthy — a process that reached its epitome when George W. Bush won re-election by posing as America’s defender against gay married terrorists, then announced that he had a mandate to privatize Social Security.

... The point is that today’s dismal G.O.P. field — is there anyone who doesn’t consider it dismal? — is no accident. Economic conservatives played a cynical game, and now they’re facing the blowback, a party that suffers from “severe” conservatism in the worst way. And the malady may take many years to cure.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: 'Something has clearly gone very wrong with modern American conservatism' (Original Post) Newsjock Feb 2012 OP
KRUGMAN NAILS IT Skittles Feb 2012 #1
My Favorite 1ProudAtheist Feb 2012 #2
Excellent Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #9
Another Goodie 1ProudAtheist Feb 2012 #3
they over reached and pissed off to many of their own madrchsod Feb 2012 #4
Sane or not, many will vote for the GOP nominee Martin Eden Feb 2012 #12
2 People will be picked that are supposedly running for office just1voice Feb 2012 #20
Don't kid yourself Doctor_J Feb 2012 #18
Current events require a small edit to your comment: Jackpine Radical Feb 2012 #22
thanks....i see they revealed the secret building with all those petitions madrchsod Feb 2012 #29
Sadly, there are segments of the population where they have large leads over Obama muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #35
To Be Sure colsohlibgal Feb 2012 #5
I'm going to start using the phrase, "He/She is severely conservatated" when refering to Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #6
One of the posters below this article wrote that the media might try to revive Rmoney by saying he demgrrrll Feb 2012 #7
Agreed Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #10
More and more nails go into the coffin of the GOP for 2012 Kennah Feb 2012 #8
The devolution of the Republican Party has been so complete no_hypocrisy Feb 2012 #11
I severely rec'd this post. n/t jtuck004 Feb 2012 #13
"Severely conservative." City Lights Feb 2012 #14
It's Hate Radio and Fox "News" Doctor_J Feb 2012 #15
Mega dittoes kemah Feb 2012 #16
I think the lack of signs at Beck's "Restoring Honor" event OnyxCollie Feb 2012 #24
Only the brainwashed think education is brainwashing. Beartracks Feb 2012 #31
yep.....my hatred for limpo and Fux, and all their ilk BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2012 #17
Mean, ignorant, and evil... chervilant Feb 2012 #25
It Is Like I Have Posted Before DallasNE Feb 2012 #19
The adverb that follows “severely”; trumad Feb 2012 #21
Modern conservatism is a bizarre, artificial construct Ebadlun Feb 2012 #23
As I've said before zipplewrath Feb 2012 #26
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2012 #27
I think he my post! caseymoz Feb 2012 #28
Freidmanism is nothing short of sociopathy. Dont call me Shirley Feb 2012 #30
Nice to see that someone's finally noticed it and pointed it out. Crunchy Frog Feb 2012 #32
Great article, Thanks for posting! Kick and Rec emulatorloo Feb 2012 #33
Spam deleted by ornotna (MIR Team) conniepei Feb 2012 #34

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
4. they over reached and pissed off to many of their own
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:22 AM
Feb 2012

i can`t imagine any sane republican voting for any of these clowns.

Martin Eden

(12,863 posts)
12. Sane or not, many will vote for the GOP nominee
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 07:48 AM
Feb 2012

Regardless of the extent to which the particulars of the insane rhetoric and tinfoil hat crap is actually believed, the sheer weight of the rightwing narrative has sunk in. A large segment of the voting public is rabidly anti-Obama, and above all else want him out of the White House.

As Krugman put it, "American conservatism end(ed) up so detached from, indeed at odds with, facts and rationality" because the Republican base "really believed in all the hokum."

Hopefully there are still enough voters in this country who are not batguano crazy. I think Obama will win, but he's going to have to run a good campaign without any October surprises.

 

just1voice

(1,362 posts)
20. 2 People will be picked that are supposedly running for office
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 10:22 AM
Feb 2012

1 will be selected, but not by voters. That is the truth about elections in the U.S..

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
22. Current events require a small edit to your comment:
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:25 AM
Feb 2012

i can`t imagine any sane republican.
There. I fixed it.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
29. thanks....i see they revealed the secret building with all those petitions
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:37 PM
Feb 2012

i read the comments at captimes..dam there are some really low intelligent posters

muriel_volestrangler

(101,307 posts)
35. Sadly, there are segments of the population where they have large leads over Obama
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 10:08 AM
Feb 2012

whether it's Romney or Santorum who would be the Repub candidate. Here's the breakdown of a poll: http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-detailed_tables/2-13-12%20Horserace%20tables.pdf

Obama is behind both the others in the following groups:
Men (3 to 5 points behind)
65+ (4 to 5 points)
White, non-Hispanic (8 points)
WNH evangelical (51 to 55 points!!!)
WNH mainline Protestant (4 points)
WNH Catholic (8 to 13 points)
Attends religious services weekly or more often (15 to 19 points)
White men (23 to 24 points)

If the electorate were restricted to white men, as the Founding Fathers had intended, Obama wouldn't stand a chance. It's deeply worrying that Santorum or Romney get so much support from that demographic. (I speak as a white man, though not an American, so I'm not in the precise demographic concerned.)

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
5. To Be Sure
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:43 AM
Feb 2012

Nixon, Ike, and Ford seem like pinkos compared to where the R's reside now. It's startling and they should and may well drive right off the cliff. This pack depends heavily on duping regular, everyday people into screwing themselves by voting for them.....and the number dumb enough to do that looks to be dwindling, many may be tiring of carrying water for billionaires.

Santorum seems to have lost his mind, that rambling talk about liberals and the French Revolution was fruit loop city. Then we hear Romney talking about being a "severe" conservative, which is nonsense if you look at his past. R's still haven't figured out video and audio tape exist.

It seems now that Obama would have to work really hard to lose this November. Let's hope we wrestle back control of the House and further our edge in the senate.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
6. I'm going to start using the phrase, "He/She is severely conservatated" when refering to
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:46 AM
Feb 2012

another outrageous thing or legislative act that said person says or introduces.

demgrrrll

(3,590 posts)
7. One of the posters below this article wrote that the media might try to revive Rmoney by saying he
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:55 AM
Feb 2012

will bring the party back to sanity. I thought that was very insightful. I think that is exactly what the media will do. Rmoney has no interest in bringing the party back to sanity.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
10. Agreed
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 05:10 AM
Feb 2012

Watching how the media has manipulated the GOP field this campaign has been fascinating. It has been a circus of She's Up, She's Down, He's Up, He's Down, He's Up, Check what Sarah Palin Says, He's Down, He's Up, Oops He has a skeleton in his closet, He's Out.

This has always been about media news cycles (ad revenue/filling air time) & nothing more.

Kennah

(14,256 posts)
8. More and more nails go into the coffin of the GOP for 2012
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 03:15 AM
Feb 2012

Perhaps they'll come back in 20 years with a reconstituted Whig Party. They have a thing for playing dress up with hats.

no_hypocrisy

(46,081 posts)
11. The devolution of the Republican Party has been so complete
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 07:09 AM
Feb 2012

that the candidates in their own way can't pull back at this point in time. To do so would be heresy by the people who bankroll them.

City Lights

(25,171 posts)
14. "Severely conservative."
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 08:33 AM
Feb 2012

I love this phrase!

Thanks, Mitt Rmoney, for the laugh!

to Krugman, for another great column.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
15. It's Hate Radio and Fox "News"
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 08:40 AM
Feb 2012

I don't understand why none of the analysts, including Prof. Krugman, avoid the obvious. Limpballs and all of his clones took over America 20 years ago, and we've been in a death spiral ever since - all of their minions are mean, ignorant, and evil.

kemah

(276 posts)
16. Mega dittoes
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 09:10 AM
Feb 2012

Their is a cottage industry promoting conservatism and it pays very well. The low informed voters or stupid voters are always voting against their self-interests. The right wing play on racism, hatred, ignorance, and good old time religion to promote their cause. But the super rich just laugh at them behind their backs. That's why they push for charter schools, defunding public education, and home schooling. Ricky Santorum even said that the reason Obama wants more students in higher education was to brain wash them.

You can see from the tea party rallies their ignorance, their misspelled signs, their incoherent messages, their revised history. Glenn Beck was so worried that he banned signs from his rallies. Fox news with their palm trees in Wisconsin, promoting the tea party rallies, Dick Armey, $500,000 per year, grass roots, tea party hack.

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
24. I think the lack of signs at Beck's "Restoring Honor" event
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:10 PM
Feb 2012

had more to do with the Koch brothers/Americans for Prosperity/FreedomWorks maintaining a tax-deductible image advertising campaign than a concern over the stupidity put on display.

Beartracks

(12,809 posts)
31. Only the brainwashed think education is brainwashing.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 08:20 PM
Feb 2012

Once again, Santorum demonstrates how the right wing accuses others of the kind of deeds that they themselves already do or would do given the chance.

===========================

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
17. yep.....my hatred for limpo and Fux, and all their ilk
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 09:11 AM
Feb 2012

knows no bounds.

the media-driven hate helped kill a relationship with someone I loved a lot, too. The poisonous effects of this garbage isn't limited just to the political realm. The whole society (meaning, many individual people on a large scale) is violated by it.



Krugman is right-on, once again.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
25. Mean, ignorant, and evil...
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:16 PM
Feb 2012

and they promote the same in their glassy-eyed minions. In fact, they strive to convince their pathetic sock puppets that these are virtues to be lauded.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
19. It Is Like I Have Posted Before
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 10:16 AM
Feb 2012

I grew up during the McCarthy era, with Gabriel Heater the Rush Limbaugh of the day, and conservatives were more forgiving then. Their hero du jure was Ohio Sen. Robert Taft. Their Romney of the day did not bend to out Taft Taft by being severely conservative. Instead, Gen. Eisenhower stood his ground and went on to be a two term President. Romney is certainly no Eishenhower -- a man that saved the Republican Party and built the Interstate highway system.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
21. The adverb that follows “severely”;
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:02 AM
Feb 2012

the adverb “severely”; the top five, in frequency of use, are disabled, depressed, ill, limited and injured.

Ebadlun

(336 posts)
23. Modern conservatism is a bizarre, artificial construct
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:25 AM
Feb 2012

What do climate-change denial and gay-hating (sorry, defence of marriage) even have to do with each other? And yet this patchwork quilt of unrelated beliefs has hardened over the last 20 years into a rigid straitjacket.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
26. As I've said before
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:24 PM
Feb 2012

Krugman just keeps making my point:

After all, that health reform Mr. Romney wants us to forget followed a blueprint originally laid out at the Heritage Foundation!


This is the same blueprint that Obama claims was a basis for his HCR. We got the HCR that the GOP wrote, and they didn't even have to vote for it.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
28. I think he my post!
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 03:49 PM
Feb 2012

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=292238

Twenty years of post-fairness doctrine propaganda has finally created a generation of Republican leaders whose worldview is completely uninformed by reality. Now the GOP is at a disadvantage.

It goes to show how propaganda is harmful to its practitioners in the long run.

Crunchy Frog

(26,579 posts)
32. Nice to see that someone's finally noticed it and pointed it out.
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 12:42 AM
Feb 2012

I mean someone in the official media; most of us have realized it for at least the past decade.

Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Krugman: 'Something has c...