The Thomas Hobbes Presidency - Bret Stephens
First, the obvious: Had it been Barack Obama, rather than Donald Trump, who suggested a moral equivalency between the United States and Vladimir Putins Russia, Republican politicians would not now be rushing through their objections to the comparison in TV interviews while hoping to pivot to tax reform.
Had it been the president of three weeks ago who had answered Bill OReillys comment that Mr. Putin is a killer by saying, Weve got a lot of killers, and What do you think? Our countrys so innocent? conservative pundits wouldnt rest with calling the remark inexplicable or troubling. They would call it moral treason and spend the next four years playing the same clip on repeat, right through the next election.
In 2009, Mr. Obama gave a series of speeches containing passing expressions of regret for vaguely specified blemishes from the American past.. This time, Mr. Trump didnt apologize for America. He indicted it. He did so in language unprecedented for any sitting or former president. He did it in a manner guaranteed, and perhaps calculated, to vindicate every hard-left slander of Amerika. If you are the sort who believes the CIA assassinated JFK, masterminded the crack-cocaine epidemic, and deliberately lied us into the war in Iraqconspiracy theories on a moral par with the way the Putin regime behaves in actual factthen this president is for you.
Only hes worse.
For the most part, the lefts various indictments of the U.S., whether well- or ill-grounded, have had a moral purpose: to shame Americans into better behavior. We are reminded of the evils of slavery and Jim Crow in order not to be racist. We dilate on the failure in Vietnam to guard against the arrogance of power. We recall the abuses of McCarthyism in order to underscore the importance of civil liberties.
Mr. Trumps purpose, by contrast, isnt to prevent a recurrence of bad behavior. Its to permit it.
(snip)
Magnanimity, fair dealing, example setting, win-win solutions, a city set upon a hill: All this, in the presidents mind, is a suckers game, obscuring the dog-eat-dog realities of life. Among other distinctions, Mr. Trump may be our first Hobbesian president. It would be a mistake to underestimate the political potency of this outlook, with its left-right mix of relativism and jingoism. If were no better than anyone else, why not act like everyone else?
(snip)
The larger question for conservatives is how Mr. Trumps dim view of the world will serve them over time. Honorable Republicans such as Nebraskas Sen. Ben Sasse have been unequivocal in their outrage, which will surely cost them politically. Others have hit the mute button, on the theory that its foolish to be baited by the presidents every crass utterance.
More..
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-thomas-hobbes-presidency-1486426412
(googling the title can often allow one to read the complete article)
malthaussen
(17,184 posts)Skittles
(153,142 posts)seriously YOU FUCKING SUCK
longship
(40,416 posts)But OP gives us a good look at what it says.
Worth an R& for that alone.
question everything
(47,465 posts)He ended up with some reference to Reagan which we can do without..