Do voter identification laws suppress minority voting? Yes. We did the research.
By Zoltan L. Hajnal, Nazita Lajevardi and Lindsay Nielson February 15 at 6:00 AM
The Justice Department just got a new boss: Jeff Sessions. He is raising alarms in the civil rights community. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights is concerned about his record of hostility toward the Voting Rights Act and the enforcement of civil rights. The NAACP-Legal Defense Fund lamented that it is unimaginable that he could be entrusted to serve as the chief law enforcement officer for this nations civil rights laws. No one knows for sure how Sessions will perform as attorney general the former Republican senator from Alabama did, after all, once vote to renew the Voting Rights Act, in 2006 but for many his record is deeply troubling.
Voter identification laws have spread rapidly in the past 10 years
What we do know is that voter identification laws are spreading rapidly around the country. Before 2006, no state required photo identification to vote on Election Day. Today 10 states have this requirement. All told, a total of 33 states representing more than half the nations population have some version of voter identification rules on the books.
As we detail below, our research shows that these laws lower minority turnout and benefit the Republican Party.
There is, of course, widespread debate about the merits of these new laws. Proponents claim that ID laws are necessary to reduce fraud and to restore trust in the democratic system. Critics claim that voter ID laws serve as effective barriers that limit the legitimate participation of racial and ethnic minorities and other disadvantaged groups.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/02/15/do-voter-identification-laws-suppress-minority-voting-yes-we-did-the-research/?utm_term=.5979f7318ddf&wpisrc=nl_politics&wpmm=1