Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Was the latest WikiLeaks "bombshell" an attempt to discredit
the Intelligence Community?
The Truth About the WikiLeaks C.I.A. Cache
Zeynep Tufekci
On Tuesday morning, WikiLeaks released an enormous cache of documents that it claimed detailed C.I.A. hacking tools. Immediately afterward, it posted two startling tweets asserting that C.I.A. hacker malware posed a threat to journalists and others who require secure communication by infecting iPhone and Android devices and bypassing encrypted message apps such as Signal and WhatsApp.
This appeared to be a bombshell. Signal is considered the gold standard for secure communication. WhatsApp has a billion users. The C.I.A., it seemed, had the capacity to conduct sweeping surveillance on what we had previously assumed were our safest and most private digital conversations.
In their haste to post articles about the release, almost all the leading news organizations took the WikiLeaks tweets at face value. Their initial accounts mentioned Signal, WhatsApp and other encrypted apps by name, and described them as bypassed or otherwise compromised by the C.I.A.s cyberspying tools.
Yet on closer inspection, this turned out to be misleading. Neither Signal nor WhatsApp, for example, appears by name in any of the alleged C.I.A. files in the cache. (Using automated tools to search the whole database, as security researchers subsequently did, turned up no hits.) More important, the hacking methods described in the documents do not, in fact, include the ability to bypass such encrypted apps at least not in the sense of bypass that had seemed so alarming. Indeed, if anything, the C.I.A. documents in the cache confirm the strength of encryption technologies.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/the-truth-about-the-wikileaks-cia-cache.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1552 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was the latest WikiLeaks "bombshell" an attempt to discredit (Original Post)
Mme. Defarge
Mar 2017
OP
Yeah it dovetails with this "deep state" and hackers "could be anyone" bullshit.
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#1
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)1. Yeah it dovetails with this "deep state" and hackers "could be anyone" bullshit.
dalton99a
(81,406 posts)2. It fits Trump's narrative to a T.
Also it coincides with Trumps wiretap accusations.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)4. Winner winner!!!!
Notice Roger Stone is back in Russia.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)9. Remember the huge Trump-Russia news domination just before?
Then Trump's off-the-leash Saturday "wiretap" tweetstorm, then Wikileaks' CIA drop. Of course this was deliberate distraction and discrediting, of Obama as well as CIA.
Mme. Defarge
(8,014 posts)5. Assange's comments today
definitely seem to further that narrative.
MFM008
(19,803 posts)6. BINGO
.......
Skittles
(153,122 posts)7. it's all theater for Trump's idiotic supporters
the dittomasters know they will believe ANYTHING
roscoeroscoe
(1,369 posts)8. What a surprise
How can anyone buy into this b.s?