Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mme. Defarge

(8,014 posts)
Thu Mar 9, 2017, 09:11 PM Mar 2017

Was the latest WikiLeaks "bombshell" an attempt to discredit

the Intelligence Community?


The Truth About the WikiLeaks C.I.A. Cache

Zeynep Tufekci
On Tuesday morning, WikiLeaks released an enormous cache of documents that it claimed detailed “C.I.A. hacking tools.” Immediately afterward, it posted two startling tweets asserting that “C.I.A. hacker malware” posed a threat to journalists and others who require secure communication by infecting iPhone and Android devices and “bypassing” encrypted message apps such as Signal and WhatsApp.

This appeared to be a bombshell. Signal is considered the gold standard for secure communication. WhatsApp has a billion users. The C.I.A., it seemed, had the capacity to conduct sweeping surveillance on what we had previously assumed were our safest and most private digital conversations.

In their haste to post articles about the release, almost all the leading news organizations took the WikiLeaks tweets at face value. Their initial accounts mentioned Signal, WhatsApp and other encrypted apps by name, and described them as “bypassed” or otherwise compromised by the C.I.A.’s cyberspying tools.

Yet on closer inspection, this turned out to be misleading. Neither Signal nor WhatsApp, for example, appears by name in any of the alleged C.I.A. files in the cache. (Using automated tools to search the whole database, as security researchers subsequently did, turned up no hits.) More important, the hacking methods described in the documents do not, in fact, include the ability to bypass such encrypted apps — at least not in the sense of “bypass” that had seemed so alarming. Indeed, if anything, the C.I.A. documents in the cache confirm the strength of encryption technologies.


https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/the-truth-about-the-wikileaks-cia-cache.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was the latest WikiLeaks "bombshell" an attempt to discredit (Original Post) Mme. Defarge Mar 2017 OP
Yeah it dovetails with this "deep state" and hackers "could be anyone" bullshit. bettyellen Mar 2017 #1
It fits Trump's narrative to a T. dalton99a Mar 2017 #2
Yes TNLib Mar 2017 #3
Winner winner!!!! Wellstone ruled Mar 2017 #4
Remember the huge Trump-Russia news domination just before? Hortensis Mar 2017 #9
Assange's comments today Mme. Defarge Mar 2017 #5
BINGO MFM008 Mar 2017 #6
it's all theater for Trump's idiotic supporters Skittles Mar 2017 #7
What a surprise roscoeroscoe Mar 2017 #8

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Remember the huge Trump-Russia news domination just before?
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 08:23 AM
Mar 2017

Then Trump's off-the-leash Saturday "wiretap" tweetstorm, then Wikileaks' CIA drop. Of course this was deliberate distraction and discrediting, of Obama as well as CIA.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Was the latest WikiLeaks ...