Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
George F. Will op-ed: Trump has a dangerous disability
Trump has a dangerous disability
By George F. Will Opinion writer May 3 at 7:36 PM
It is urgent for Americans to think and speak clearly about President Trumps inability to do either. This seems to be not a mere disinclination but a disability. It is not merely the result of intellectual sloth but of an untrained mind bereft of information and married to stratospheric self-confidence. ... In February, acknowledging Black History Month, Trump said that Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody whos done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice. Because Trump is syntactically challenged, it was possible and tempting to see this not as a historical howler about a man who died 122 years ago, but as just another of Trumps verbal fender benders, this one involving verb tenses.
Now, however, he has instructed us that Andrew Jackson was angry about the Civil War that began 16 years after Jacksons death. Having, let us fancifully imagine, considered and found unconvincing William Sewards 1858 judgment that the approaching Civil War was an irrepressible conflict, Trump says:
Library shelves groan beneath the weight of books asking questions about that wars origins, so who, one wonders, are these people who dont ask the questions that Trump evidently thinks have occurred to him uniquely? Presumably they are not the astute lot of, or at least some, people Trump referred to when speaking about his February address to a joint session of Congress: A lot of people have said that, some people said it was the single best speech ever made in that chamber. Which demotes Winston Churchill, among many others.
....
As president-elect, Trump did not know the pedigree and importance of the one-China policy. About such things he can be, if he is willing to be, tutored. It is, however, too late to rectify this defect: He lacks what T.S. Eliot called a sense not only of the pastness of the past, but of its presence. His fathomless lack of interest in Americas path to the present and his limitless gullibility leave him susceptible to being blown about by gusts of factoids that cling like lint to a disorderly mind.
Americans have placed vast military power at the discretion of this mind, a presidential discretion that is largely immune to restraint by the Madisonian system of institutional checks and balances. So, it is up to the public to quarantine this presidency by insistently communicating to its elected representatives a steady, rational fear of this man whose combination of impulsivity and credulity render him uniquely unfit to take the nation into a military conflict.
....
George F. Will writes a twice-weekly column on politics and domestic and foreign affairs. He began his column with The Post in 1974, and he received the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary in 1977. Follow @georgewill
By George F. Will Opinion writer May 3 at 7:36 PM
It is urgent for Americans to think and speak clearly about President Trumps inability to do either. This seems to be not a mere disinclination but a disability. It is not merely the result of intellectual sloth but of an untrained mind bereft of information and married to stratospheric self-confidence. ... In February, acknowledging Black History Month, Trump said that Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody whos done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice. Because Trump is syntactically challenged, it was possible and tempting to see this not as a historical howler about a man who died 122 years ago, but as just another of Trumps verbal fender benders, this one involving verb tenses.
Now, however, he has instructed us that Andrew Jackson was angry about the Civil War that began 16 years after Jacksons death. Having, let us fancifully imagine, considered and found unconvincing William Sewards 1858 judgment that the approaching Civil War was an irrepressible conflict, Trump says:
People dont realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why? People dont ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?
Library shelves groan beneath the weight of books asking questions about that wars origins, so who, one wonders, are these people who dont ask the questions that Trump evidently thinks have occurred to him uniquely? Presumably they are not the astute lot of, or at least some, people Trump referred to when speaking about his February address to a joint session of Congress: A lot of people have said that, some people said it was the single best speech ever made in that chamber. Which demotes Winston Churchill, among many others.
....
As president-elect, Trump did not know the pedigree and importance of the one-China policy. About such things he can be, if he is willing to be, tutored. It is, however, too late to rectify this defect: He lacks what T.S. Eliot called a sense not only of the pastness of the past, but of its presence. His fathomless lack of interest in Americas path to the present and his limitless gullibility leave him susceptible to being blown about by gusts of factoids that cling like lint to a disorderly mind.
Americans have placed vast military power at the discretion of this mind, a presidential discretion that is largely immune to restraint by the Madisonian system of institutional checks and balances. So, it is up to the public to quarantine this presidency by insistently communicating to its elected representatives a steady, rational fear of this man whose combination of impulsivity and credulity render him uniquely unfit to take the nation into a military conflict.
....
George F. Will writes a twice-weekly column on politics and domestic and foreign affairs. He began his column with The Post in 1974, and he received the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary in 1977. Follow @georgewill
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 8181 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George F. Will op-ed: Trump has a dangerous disability (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
OP
babylonsister posted this earlier. It's in GD. I didn't see it when I posted.
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#5
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)1. When a GOP type loses George Will, they are in trouble
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)2. I hate agreeing with George Will.
I wish he was wrong.
get the red out
(13,461 posts)3. Me to
But he has been correct on Trump for a while.
The Trump threat goes beyond party, I wish more Rs recognized that.
Jacquette
(152 posts)4. He's a take no prisoners hard core Republican
to his marrow but he hopped off the Trump Express with the quickness. He had me in stiches during the campaign with his facial expressions trying to digest some of DT's biggest howlers.
Kristol would be twisting himself into pretzels trying to find nicer words for Nazi or rapist and George would look at him...totally expressionless, oozing disdain. And nobody oozes like George.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)5. babylonsister posted this earlier. It's in GD. I didn't see it when I posted.
LudwigPastorius
(9,136 posts)6. The congressional GOPers seem content to...
allow the party establishment to rail against Trump's unfitness as long as they can cram a good amount of their agenda down America's throat on the side.
But, they must feel a sense of urgency to get as much done as possible before Trump is thrown out of office or before he burns the country, or the world, down to the ground.
They are, in essence, playing Russian Roulette with the country, gambling that they can advance their interests in the game and avoid the one in the chamber that will kill us all.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Wednesdays This message was self-deleted by its author.