Trump's extraordinary surrender of power - By Robert J. Samuelson
President Trumps foreign policy, such as it is, rests on a massive and apparently indestructible contradiction. Trump wants the United States to remain the essential nation, the best embodiment of Western ideals of freedom and democracy, while at the same time deliberately alienating many of our traditional allies, whose support the United States desperately needs. American leadership becomes difficult, if not impossible.
It is hard to straddle this contradiction, because it reflects a basic misunderstanding of the American greatness that Trump so avidly pursues. To Trump, this greatness is mainly measured in economic terms: the number of added jobs; the trajectory of wages; the rate of economic growth. It is a nostalgic and unrealistic yearning for the economic dominance the United States enjoyed in the 1950s and 1960s.
The truth is that American greatness then and later was never about dollars and cents alone. Prosperity was a means to an end, not an end in itself. The greater objective was to promote democracy and mixed economies, with power divided between the market and government. To advance this vision, the United States advocated open trade and provided a military umbrella. The latter created a geopolitical shield against instability.
Trump sees the costs of these programs as showing that past U.S. leaders were willing to sacrifice the interests of ordinary Americans to meaningless global cooperation. U.S. officials negotiated horrible trade deals; American workers lost their jobs to imports; our putative allies didnt pick up their fair share of military spending. These allies were rivals, not partners.
Although there was some truth to these complaints, they were (and are) fundamentally misleading. The notion that Americans simply abandoned their own interests for Japans, Germanys or South Koreas to select a few obvious countries is counterfactual. Americans thought, correctly, that their embrace of a generous approach to the world exemplified enlightened self-interest. Our economic and political interests were served by a prosperous and increasingly democratic global system.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-trade-trap/2017/07/09/f6dc8ae2-6336-11e7-a4f7-af34fc1d9d39_story.html