Obama tried to give Zuckerberg a wake-up call over fake news on Facebook
Source: Washington Post
Obama tried to give Zuckerberg a wake-up call over fake news on Facebook
By Adam Entous, Elizabeth Dwoskin and Craig Timberg September 24 at 7:51 PM
Nine days after Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg dismissed as crazy the idea that fake news on his companys social network played a key role in the U.S. election, President Barack Obama pulled the youthful tech billionaire aside and delivered what he hoped would be a wake-up call.
For months leading up to the vote, Obama and his top aides quietly agonized over how to respond to Russias brazen intervention on behalf of the Donald Trump campaign without making matters worse. Weeks after Trumps surprise victory, some of Obamas aides looked back with regret and wished they had done more.
Now huddled in a private room on the sidelines of a meeting of world leaders in Lima, Peru, two months before Trumps inauguration, Obama made a personal appeal to Zuckerberg to take the threat of fake news and political disinformation seriously. Unless Facebook and the government did more to address the threat, Obama warned, it would only get worse in the next presidential race.
Zuckerberg acknowledged the problem posed by fake news. But he told Obama those messages werent widespread on Facebook and that there was no easy fix, according to people briefed on the exchange, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of a private conversation.
The conversation on Nov. 19 was a flashpoint in a tumultuous year in which Zuckerberg came to recognize the magnitude of a new threat a coordinated assault on a U.S. election by a shadowy foreign force that exploited the social network he created.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obama-tried-to-give-zuckerberg-a-wake-up-call-over-fake-news-on-facebook/2017/09/24/15d19b12-ddac-4ad5-ac6e-ef909e1c1284_story.html
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the Admin should have kicked ass much earlier. In fact, once
Comey started his junk, the hands off should have been replaced with a new strategy.
I know Obama was trying to maintain neutrality, avoid a white wing backlash, and thought Clinton would win anyway, but something could have been done.
Didn't do much good to say this after the stolen election
drmeow
(5,017 posts)Unfortunately, I think Obama thought Clinton had it locked up and so he felt like he could get away with being neutral. What I don't know is whether he would have done more if he had real concerns that Trump would win - I hope so.
pandr32
(11,576 posts)President Obama faced an avalanche of hate and criticism while in office. He wanted to spare Democrats from charges he tried to influence the election when they were already facing enough vileness. He hoped they would be able to govern without some of his own undeserved baggage piled on.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and he knew the absolute cataclysmic shitstorm that would have come if he was seen as openly trying to influence to taint the election...
Of course, now that Dicktater Donnie has thrown all the norms out the window, most people wouldn't even give a shit now...
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Quite a few new details and color on the role of FB in the election.
Looks like everybody now agrees Russia ran a sophisticated disinformation campaign to influence our election. That includes Facebook, WaPo, Obama, Senate and House Intel committees. This agreement in and of itself is huge news.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)radhika
(1,008 posts)I get he wanted to stay impartial.
Still, I would have liked him to tell the American people what he told Zuckerberg about his FB concerns. And was more vocal about Russian hacks, made a bigger case Maybe doing thru surrogates if he wanted to stay apart. It might have made a difference.
I also wish he had legally challenged Mc Connell on the Merrick Garland fiasco. Perhaps the SCOTUS could have allocated that nomination to the sitting president.
Ah well, water under the bridge.