Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Here's what's really terrifying about the Twitter employee who temporarily disabled Trump's account
Here's what's really terrifying about the Twitter employee who temporarily disabled Trump's account on his last day
Alexei Oreskovic
14h
....
But there's really nothing funny or commendable about the momentary unplugging of the @realdonaldtrump account. In fact, it's terrifying.
Trump's Twitter account is an unprecedented phenomenon. The most powerful person in the world has a megaphone to say whatever comes across his mind instantly. There's no filter; no time delay; no take-backs.
Just think, what if the rogue support staffer on his last day decided to do something different. What if, instead of taking Trump's account offline, the staffer decided to fire off a tweet on Trump's account? Perhaps the staffer might have had Trump say something idiotic or embarrassing.* Perhaps the staffer might have had Trump bash a company's stock, in hopes of trading ahead of it and make a quick buck.
Or perhaps the departing Twitter employee might have composed a tweet declaring that missiles had been fired at an enemy regime like North Korea. ... Twitter has control over an internet-age nuclear weapon. We can't afford to trust that Twitter knows how to take care of it.
Alexei Oreskovic
14h
....
But there's really nothing funny or commendable about the momentary unplugging of the @realdonaldtrump account. In fact, it's terrifying.
Trump's Twitter account is an unprecedented phenomenon. The most powerful person in the world has a megaphone to say whatever comes across his mind instantly. There's no filter; no time delay; no take-backs.
Just think, what if the rogue support staffer on his last day decided to do something different. What if, instead of taking Trump's account offline, the staffer decided to fire off a tweet on Trump's account? Perhaps the staffer might have had Trump say something idiotic or embarrassing.* Perhaps the staffer might have had Trump bash a company's stock, in hopes of trading ahead of it and make a quick buck.
Or perhaps the departing Twitter employee might have composed a tweet declaring that missiles had been fired at an enemy regime like North Korea. ... Twitter has control over an internet-age nuclear weapon. We can't afford to trust that Twitter knows how to take care of it.
* How could you tell the difference?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 3051 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's what's really terrifying about the Twitter employee who temporarily disabled Trump's account (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
OP
Then Twitter should delete his account, saying that he presents an unacceptable security risk, and
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
#3
What's to stop a President from joking about launching an attack on a country?...
PoliticAverse
Nov 2017
#2
I am not sure this author knows much about modern internet security and design.
LonePirate
Nov 2017
#4
Yes the ability to suspend an account or even delete a specific tweet should be completely unrelated
PoliticAverse
Nov 2017
#5
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)1. This is not on Twitter
This is on Trump, who is choosing to use an inappropriate platform to carry out international policy. Governing by social media is a bad idea.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,412 posts)3. Then Twitter should delete his account, saying that he presents an unacceptable security risk, and
that they don't want to be part of that threat.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)2. What's to stop a President from joking about launching an attack on a country?...
Nothing apparently...
LonePirate
(13,417 posts)4. I am not sure this author knows much about modern internet security and design.
Short of cracking the account password, the employee should not have had any ability to send a tweet under that account. The potential liability is too great a risk for any tech company.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)5. Yes the ability to suspend an account or even delete a specific tweet should be completely unrelated
to the ability to send a tweet as someone.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)6. none of his staffers are as stupid and reckless as him.