Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
1. So, it's okay that AG Barr exonerated the pos....when in fact...this report should have just been
Thu May 2, 2019, 02:24 PM
May 2019

given to Congress....that is the part Flood left out....

Karadeniz

(22,461 posts)
2. Okay, our lawyers needed! I quit reading after the letter stated that a special counsel
Thu May 2, 2019, 07:53 PM
May 2019

Is supposed to take a guilty determination to a grand jury for indictment...as if impeachment isn't an option and as if the DoJ doesn't have an opinion that a president shouldn't be indicted. So I'm obviously missing something in the writer's reasoning.

Help, please!!!

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
3. legalize meant to confuse
Thu May 2, 2019, 08:07 PM
May 2019

obfuscation and misrepresentation... you're missing something because the author is irrational and unreasonable

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»White House letter to Bar...