5 essential reads on Endangered Species Act
By Jennifer Weeks
For The Conversation
The Trump administration recently announced rule changes that alter how it will enforce the 1973 Endangered Species Act, which protects threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Among these changes, officials can now consider potential costs in deciding whether to list a species. The new policies will make it easier to delist species, and are likely to shrink areas set aside as critical habitat to help species recover.
These five articles from The Conversations archives describe public perceptions of the Endangered Species Act and the challenges of saving species on the edge.
1. Americans support protecting endangered species: Critics of the Endangered Species Act say the law is too bureaucratic and costly to private interests, and that states should have a bigger role. But when Ohio State Universitys Jeremy Bruskotter and Ramiro Berardo and Michigan Technological Universitys John Vucetich reviewed 20 years of data on public views of the law, they found that over that time, roughly 80 percentof Americans consistently supported it.
Notably, while liberals strongly favored protecting endangered species, nearly 75 percent of conservatives did so as well. In a 2015 survey, more than 70 percent of hunters, farmers and ranchers supported the Endangered Species Act.
Why, then, are critics of the law so determined to weaken it? The authors point to research showing that policy outcomes in America are heavily influenced by economic elites and business interests who
have greater clout with, and access to, policymakers than average voters.
-more-
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/viewpoints-5-essential-reads-on-endangered-species-act/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=b2f3e76226-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-b2f3e76226-228635337