America holds onto an undemocratic assumption from its founding: that some people deserve more power
Source: New York Times
The 1619 Project examines the legacy of slavery in America.
America holds onto an undemocratic assumption from its founding: that some people deserve more power than others.
What the Reactionary Politics of 2019 Owe to the Politics of Slavery
By Jamelle Bouie
AUG. 14, 2019
If you want to understand American politics in 2019 and the strain of reactionary extremism that has taken over the Republican Party, a good place to start is 2011: the year after a backlash to Barack Obamas presidency swept Tea Party insurgents into Congress, flipping control of the House.
It was clear, at the start of that year, that Congress would have to lift the debt ceiling the limit on bonds and other debt instruments the government issues when it doesnt have the revenues to fulfill spending obligations. These votes were often opportunities for grandstanding and occasionally brinkmanship by politicians from both parties. But it was understood that, when push came to shove, Congress would lift the limit and the government would pay its obligations.
2011 was different. Congressional Republicans, led by the new Tea Party conservatives, wanted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and make other sharp cuts to the social safety net. But Democrats controlled the Senate and the White House. So House Republicans decided to take a hostage. Im asking you to look at a potential increase in the debt limit as a leverage moment when the White House and President Obama will have to deal with us, said the incoming majority leader, Eric Cantor, at a closed-door retreat days before the session began, according to The Washington Post. Either the White House would agree to harsh austerity measures or Republicans would force the United States to default on its debt obligations, precipitating an economic crisis just as the country, and the world, was beginning to recover from the Great Recession.
-snip-
Where did this destructive, sectarian style of partisan politics come from? Conventional wisdom traces its roots to the Gingrich Revolution of the 1990s, whose architect pioneered a hardball, insurgent style of political combat, undermining norms and dismantling congressional institutions for the sake of power. This is true enough, but the Republican Party of the Obama years didnt just recycle its Gingrich-era excesses; it also pursued a policy of total opposition, not just blocking Obama but also casting him as fundamentally illegitimate and un-American. He may have been elected by a majority of the voting public, but that majority didnt count. It didnt represent the real America.
Obamas election reignited a fight about democratic legitimacy about who can claim the country as their own, and who has the right to act as a citizen that is as old as American democracy itself. And the reactionary position in this conflict, which seeks to narrow the scope of participation and arrest the power of majorities beyond the limits of the Constitution, has its own peculiar history: not just in the ideological battles of the founding but also in the institution that defined the early American republic as much as any other.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/republicans-racism-african-americans.html
Cary
(11,746 posts)The right turns the idea of liberty on its ear. "Feedom" to them means "freedom to express their racism without public condemnation," or "freedom" to use their money as speech.