Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,861 posts)
Wed Aug 28, 2019, 03:57 PM Aug 2019

We Aren't Seeing White Support for Trump for What It Is.

'A crucial part of his coalition is made up of better-off white people who did not graduate from college.

On Feb. 24, 2016, after winning the Nevada caucuses, Donald Trump told supporters in Las Vegas, “I love the poorly educated.”

Technically, he should have said “I love poorly educated white people,” but his point was well taken.

We have been talking about this since Trump came down that escalator four years ago, but we haven’t quite reckoned with the depth of the changes in the electorate or the way they have reshaped both parties.

Take a look at this graphic of the changing makeup of the Republican electorate based on NBC/Wall Street Journal poll data provided by Public Opinion Strategies.

Exodus of College-Educated Whites
In the last national election, 88 percent of Republican voters were white. The proportion with a college degree fell significantly compared to 2010.

In less than a decade, from 2010 to 2018, whites without a college degree grew from 50 to 59 percent of all the Republican Party’s voters, while whites with college degrees fell from 40 to 29 percent of the party’s voters. The biggest shift took place from 2016 to 2018, when Trump became the dominant figure in American politics.

This movement of white voters has been evolving over the past 60 years. A paper published earlier this month, “Secular Partisan Realignment in the United States: The Socioeconomic Reconfiguration of White Partisan Support since the New Deal Era,” provides fresh insight into that transformation.

The authors, Herbert Kitschelt and Philipp Rehm, political scientists at Duke and Ohio State, make the argument that the transition from an industrial to a knowledge economy has produced “tectonic shifts” leading to an “education-income partisan realignment” — a profound realignment of voting patterns that has effectively turned the political allegiances of the white sector of the New Deal coalition that dominated the middle decades of the last century upside down.

Driven by what the authors call “first dimension” issues of economic redistribution, on the one hand, and by the newer “second dimension issues of citizenship, race and social governance,” the traditional alliances of New Deal era politics — low-income white voters without college degrees on the Democratic Party side, high-income white voters with degrees on the Republican side — have switched places. According to this analysis, these two constituencies are primarily motivated by “second dimension” issues, often configured around racial attitudes, which frequently correlate with level of education.

Perhaps most significant, Kitschelt and Rehm found that the common assumption that the contemporary Republican Party has become crucially dependent on the white working class — defined as whites without college degrees — is overly simplistic.

Instead, Kitschelt and Rehm find that the surge of whites into the Republican Party has been led by whites with relatively high incomes — in the top two quintiles of the income distribution — but without college degrees, a constituency that is now decisively committed to the Republican Party.

According to the census, the top two income quintiles in 2017 were made up of those with household incomes above $77,552. More than half of the voters Kitschelt and Rehm describe as high income are middle to upper middle class, from households making from $77,522 to $130,000 — not, by contemporary standards, wealthy.

Kitschelt and Rehm write:

Individuals in the low-education/high-income group tend to endorse authoritarian noneconomic policies and tend to oppose progressive economic policies. Small business owners and shopkeepers — particularly in construction, crafts, retail, and personal services — as well as some of their salaried associates populate this group.

In an email, Kitschelt elaborated:

Unlike much of the current debate, the ‘white working class’ — concentrated in the low-education/low-income sector of the white population — is not the category that has most ardently realigned toward Republicans. It’s higher income/low education whites who are currently still doing well, but fear that in the Knowledge Society their life chances are shrinking as high education becomes increasingly the ticket to economic and social success.

Low-income whites without college degrees have moved to the Republican Party, but because they frequently hold liberal economic views — that is, they support redistributionist measures from which they benefit — they are conflicted in their partisan allegiance.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/28/opinion/trump-white-voters.html?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Aren't Seeing White Support for Trump for What It Is. (Original Post) elleng Aug 2019 OP
GOP is the red neck party vlyons Aug 2019 #1
I am a Red Neck phandancer917 Aug 2019 #3
A lot of these people who make their money based on who they know TheRealNorth Aug 2019 #2

phandancer917

(145 posts)
3. I am a Red Neck
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 10:02 AM
Aug 2019

I live in Kentucky and work in the sun all day...hence the red neck. Many of my fellow Red Necks voted for Clinton (both of them), Obama and whoever opposes Trump next year. Many do not....as within most social/economic groups; none walk lock step.

Though I FULLY understand what you are saying -- I would say that Red Neck is not synonymous with the current iteration of the GOP...and I do not consider it a slur.

There are assholes in all walks of life.

TheRealNorth

(9,475 posts)
2. A lot of these people who make their money based on who they know
Wed Aug 28, 2019, 05:05 PM
Aug 2019

Last edited Wed Aug 28, 2019, 06:06 PM - Edit history (1)

Not what they know. Or their wealth is based upon the family they were born into. You can see why they are threatened by meritocracy, since their wealth probably isn't enough to translate into any great advantage for them or their kids.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»We Aren't Seeing White Su...