How a reporting mistake nearly derailed the Watergate investigation -- and how journalists recovered
With some comparing Lawrence O'Donell's apparent lapse in reporting to Rathergate. There's actually a parallel to the original 'Gate' .. Watergate ..
This story is from a few years ago but very relevant today.
Lessons from Watergate
...These errors, and Trumps eager celebration of them, recall a crucial moment when a reporting blunder almost stymied the most important political investigation in American media history Watergate. After The Post made an embarrassing mistake in an October 1972 story about powerful White House Chief of Staff H.R. Bob Haldeman, press secretary Ronald Ziegler spent a half hour angrily denouncing the newspaper on behalf of the Nixon administration.
At the time, the Watergate scandal was drawing closer to Nixons inner circle, and the error became an opportunity for Nixons team to try to derail The Posts investigation into widespread misconduct by his administration and reelection campaign.
And it almost worked. But the Post was able to recover by quickly figuring out what went wrong, making sure its reporters were careful to avoid similar mistakes and refusing to be intimidated by White House threats. Todays journalists would do well to remember these lessons. ...
As Trump and his associates have done with articles about the Russia investigation, Ziegler and other Nixon spokesmen regularly denied the allegations contained in the stories of Bernstein, Woodward and other reporters. Former Post city editor Barry Sussman explained in his book, The Great Cover-Up: Nixon and the Scandal of Watergate, that the Haldeman story gave Nixons associates a specific error they could attack. Bernstein and Woodward had misinterpreted what Sloan, the former campaign treasurer, had said and had relied on the confused answers of an FBI agent to falsely conclude that Sloan had testified about Haldeman before the grand jury.
Nixons men used the error to disparage all of the newspapers Watergate reporting. At his news briefing that day, Ziegler accused The Post of engaging in shoddy and shabby journalism and called the article a blatant effort at character assassination. Clark MacGregor, director of Nixons reelection effort, charged that The Post was operating in close philosophical and strategic cooperation with the campaign of Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern.
FBI Associate Director W. Mark Felt, who was later revealed to be The Posts secret Watergate source known as Deep Throat, told Woodward that the error would damage the Watergate investigation. Youve got people feeling sorry for Haldeman, Felt said. I didnt think that was possible. ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/made-by-history/wp/2017/12/20/how-a-reporting-mistake-nearly-derailed-the-watergate-investigation-and-how-journalists-recovered/?noredirect=on
LessAspin
(1,152 posts)This also made for a pivotal scene in the movie...
Bob Woodward: Yes.
Deep Throat: You've done worse than let Haldeman slip away: you've got people feeling sorry for him. I didn't think that was possible. In a conspiracy like this, you build from the outer edges and go step by step. If you shoot too high and miss, everybody feels more secure. You've put the investigation back months.
Bob Woodward: Yes, we know that. And if we're wrong, we're resigning. Were we wrong?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074119/quotes/qt0354365
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)All we know at this point is that there was incredibly shoddy reporting that met neither his employer's standards nor the requirements of basic journalism. The story may turn out to be true (in which case, like Watergate, it could take down a president) or false.
If the story is true, I doubt seriously that O'Donnell's error will hurt the case at all in the end.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)on DU today by "dawg day"...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=12417568
" #17. There's a famous "mistake" made by Woodward and Bernstein
You can see it in their film All the President's Men. Bernstein said later:
"We had the story right, the substance of it. What we had wrong was the attribution. It had never come before the grand jury. It was the substance that was really important at the same time, we had not been diligent in nailing this down, this one aspect of it." (It was about Haldeman being at the center of the crooked operations... he was, but it hadn't come out in the grand jury at that point.)
I was thinking of that-- O'Donnell might be saying not that it's false, but that he should have gotten more attribution before he reported it."
LessAspin
(1,152 posts)be the case. Hopefully this will come out if all is eventually revealed.