Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,056 posts)
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 05:32 PM Apr 2012

The Campaign to Privatize the World


Published on Friday, April 13, 2012 by Common Dreams
The Campaign to Privatize the World

by David Macaray


One of the biggest con games going on at the moment is the sustained attack on the U.S. public school system. It’s being perpetrated by predatory entrepreneurs (disguised as “concerned citizens” and “education reformers”) hoping to persuade the parents of school-age children that the only way their kids are going to get a decent education is by paying for something that they can already get for free. You might say it’s the same marketing campaign that launched bottled water.

The profit impulse fueling this drive is understandable. All it takes is a cursory look at the economic landscape to see why these speculators are drooling at the prospect of privatizing education. Millions of students pulling up stakes, bailing out of the public school system, and enrolling in private or charter schools? Are you kidding? Just think of the money that would generate.

Mind you, these “education reformers” are the same people who want to privatize the world—the same people who want more toll roads, who want hikers to pay trail fees, who want city parks and public beaches to charge admission. Indeed, they’re the same tribe who convinced a thirsty nation to voluntarily pay for drinking water that it could otherwise get for free.

Before comparing private and public schools, let’s revisit that bottled water craze, the stunning marketing phenomenon that made beverage companies wealthy and added a billion plastic bottles to our landfills and oceans. For the record, since passage of the Safe Drinking Water Act (1974), municipal water, unlike bottled, has been stringently regulated by the EPA, which is why bottled water contains more impurities and bacteria. In truth, city water is safer, cheaper and better for the environment. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/04/13-1



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Campaign to Privatize the World (Original Post) marmar Apr 2012 OP
I always got a sad chuckle that CA led the way with trendy environmentally RKP5637 Apr 2012 #1
Good point about California. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #4
Feudalism redux. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #2
This should be read and passed on by everyone. LoisB Apr 2012 #3
Privatization is the authoritarian personality's rebellion against authority. AdHocSolver Apr 2012 #5

RKP5637

(67,088 posts)
1. I always got a sad chuckle that CA led the way with trendy environmentally
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 05:49 PM
Apr 2012

unfriendly bottled water, at least where I was. They would scream about using too much paper while drinking their bottled water.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
4. Good point about California.
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 11:55 PM
Apr 2012

And our tap water is excellent. Don't need the stuff that is contaminated by the plastic it is sold in.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. Feudalism redux.
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 06:50 PM
Apr 2012

Privatize just means putting everything in the hands of the richest of the rich.

And when they have everything, what will they do?

Just what they did in the days of feudal kingdoms. Fight amongst themselves about who owns what. And guess who will be forced to do their fighting for them? Us and the children we bear.

Stop privatization. We should have a mix of private and public ownership of our resources and production capacities.

AdHocSolver

(2,561 posts)
5. Privatization is the authoritarian personality's rebellion against authority.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:01 PM
Apr 2012

Even when the facts are on the side of the government or the teachers or the scientists, the authoritarian personality will deny the facts in order to snub the government or teachers or "know-it-all" scientists.

This is because the authoritarian personality does not see the irony that the groups such as corporations that refer to themselves as being of the "private sector", are in reality quasi-governmental bureaucracies.

The "right wing" sees themselves as independent "rebels" when, in fact, they are lemming-like sheep easily manipulated by self-serving propaganda.

Therefore, this mentality allows them to be hypocritical and take what appears to be insane positions contrary to reality without any self-doubt about their own beliefs or actions..

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Campaign to Privatize...