Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,757 posts)
Fri Apr 17, 2020, 02:20 PM Apr 2020

Commentary: States can work together, even if D.C. won't

With sudden, fearsome ruthlessness, the pandemic has laid bare the essential weaknesses — and, yes, also strengths — of America’s unique federal structure. When Washington, D.C., proved slow in responding to the novel coronavirus, states including California, Ohio and New York moved aggressively, imposing stay-at-home measures, closing parks and ramping up testing spaces to head off an even deadlier disaster. At the same time, our decentralized approach has left us with a patchwork system in which citizens in some states remain vulnerable.

With the president eager to reopen the economy May 1 — and clashing with governors over who has the power to do so — the question of the relative power of states vs. the federal government has rarely been more important. The Constitution is largely on the side of the states. Certainly, President Trump doesn’t hold ultimate authority over local public health matters. At the same time, there are aspects of this crisis to which states simply can’t respond individually.

California, Oregon and Washington state — and, separately, seven Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states — announced this week that they would collaborate as they consider cautiously restarting their economies; a group of Midwestern states may follow. But these states could go an important step further by establishing “interstate compacts,” a legally binding form of coordination sanctioned by law. They could thereby retain some of the advantages of local autonomy yet also gain some of the benefits of larger coordination. The White House could challenge these compacts; but it’s unlikely to prevail, absent a major change to constitutional law.

States clearly need to coordinate, especially given Washington, D.C.’s stumbles. Remedying testing shortages, solving the problem of shortfalls of medical equipment and instituting protective measures against new viral resurgence all cry out for collective action. States don’t want to bid against one another for medical equipment. They want to ensure they have roughly congruent lockdown rules to prevent Covid-19 from spreading across borders.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/commentary-states-can-work-together-even-if-d-c-wont/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=ea1ef15c31-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-ea1ef15c31-228635337

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Commentary: States can work together, even if D.C. won't (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2020 OP
And you want my personal opinion? States should no longer require federal withholding to be ... SWBTATTReg Apr 2020 #1

SWBTATTReg

(22,077 posts)
1. And you want my personal opinion? States should no longer require federal withholding to be ...
Fri Apr 17, 2020, 02:38 PM
Apr 2020

done from paychecks (not SS, or medicare, etc.), but federal taxes. After all, what do we pay for if rump is withholding all from the states he doesn't like? Keep the money in house, use that money for state purposes and not give to rump and cronies, who are crooks anyway.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Commentary: States can wo...