Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Precision-guided PR for drones falls short
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/NE02Df01.htmlWASHINGTON - In a major address here on Monday, John Brennan, the United States official in charge of counter-terrorism, formally admitted that the US engages in attacks using armed unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly referred to as "drones".
But, Brennan argued, the drones program is "legal", "ethical" and "wise".
The speech, at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, marks the first official public discussion of the US's highly secretive drones program. Overseen by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the program has been stepped up significantly under President Barack Obama.
Brennan's presentation comes amid a barrage of events marking the one-year anniversary of the death of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, with Obama making much of the event as the 2012 presidential campaign heats up. According to Brennan, "President Obama has instructed us to be more open with the American people about using remotely piloted aircraft."
However, that newfound openness has not included an explanation of how potential drone targets are vetted.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1428 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Precision-guided PR for drones falls short (Original Post)
xchrom
May 2012
OP
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)1. Based upon the US drone logic,
911 would have been justified if a specific target individual had been named.
sad sally
(2,627 posts)2. The conclusion appears to be that international humanitarian laws do not exist in the eyes
of the United States. The US is in a world-wide conflict - drone targets are anywhere and everywhere.
"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain."
George Orwell, 1984
pscot
(21,024 posts)3. Wait! I thought we enjoyed complete drone transparency
Someone said so, right here on this very board.
Unaccountable
(30 posts)5. Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team)