Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue May 1, 2012, 04:47 AM May 2012

Precision-guided PR for drones falls short

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/NE02Df01.html

WASHINGTON - In a major address here on Monday, John Brennan, the United States official in charge of counter-terrorism, formally admitted that the US engages in attacks using armed unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly referred to as "drones".

But, Brennan argued, the drones program is "legal", "ethical" and "wise".

The speech, at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, marks the first official public discussion of the US's highly secretive drones program. Overseen by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the program has been stepped up significantly under President Barack Obama.

Brennan's presentation comes amid a barrage of events marking the one-year anniversary of the death of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, with Obama making much of the event as the 2012 presidential campaign heats up. According to Brennan, "President Obama has instructed us to be more open with the American people about using remotely piloted aircraft."

However, that newfound openness has not included an explanation of how potential drone targets are vetted.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Precision-guided PR for drones falls short (Original Post) xchrom May 2012 OP
Based upon the US drone logic, Downwinder May 2012 #1
The conclusion appears to be that international humanitarian laws do not exist in the eyes sad sally May 2012 #2
Wait! I thought we enjoyed complete drone transparency pscot May 2012 #3
+1 xchrom May 2012 #4
Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Unaccountable May 2012 #5

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
1. Based upon the US drone logic,
Tue May 1, 2012, 05:11 AM
May 2012

911 would have been justified if a specific target individual had been named.

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
2. The conclusion appears to be that international humanitarian laws do not exist in the eyes
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:13 PM
May 2012

of the United States. The US is in a world-wide conflict - drone targets are anywhere and everywhere.

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain."
George Orwell, 1984

pscot

(21,024 posts)
3. Wait! I thought we enjoyed complete drone transparency
Tue May 1, 2012, 07:07 PM
May 2012

Someone said so, right here on this very board.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Precision-guided PR for d...