CNN Is Terrible. Here's Why.
CNN is terrible. A God-awful, wall-to-wall, epic mess. And now, they have, in their hands, the clearest sign yet of how bad things have actually gotten. This past April, CNN posted its lowest ratings in 10 years. TheNew York Times' Brian Stelter recently noted the slim upside, writing, "people tune in to CNN, the same way they hurry to a hospital when they think they are having a heart attack." But what news channel does CNN have to tune in to, to learn the gory details of its own longrunning, sad disaster? Good news: we are that news channel.
CNN, of course, has a proud legacy to fall back on, as it is the entity that kicked off the tradition of 24 hour cable news channels in the first place, and its coverage of the first Gulf War demonstrated that it had minted real newsgathering mettle. CNN founder Ted Turner, in a meta-theatrical appearance on Piers Morgan's show last night, noted that he "wanted CNN to be the New York Times for the news business." Instead, the network has fallen lower in esteem than the New York Mets, who people actually still watch, on the teevee.
[link:http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2012/05/cnn-is-terrible-heres-why.html|
alp227
(32,015 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)The only source of independent media is on-line. Corporate advertisers and funders have a total monopoly on other sources of information and have even leeched onto the shrunken pigmy corpse of public radio and television.
The Cable news format is dead. Network TV is a mummified talking head. CNN can't cover anything more complicated than an earthquake. Long live the web and indy media!
tcaudilllg
(1,553 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)I think the original material here and the political blogs it links to are valuable. The self-described "Indie Media" sites probably have lost most of their contributors and readers to various Facebook pages and Twitter feeds.
LASlibinSC
(269 posts)It's sad. Way back before the newfangled interweb Ted Turner's CNN was really the best source of news 24/7. I'm not a big baseball fan, but I think the Braves were pretty good back then too. But Turner has to be disappointed
BlueMTexpat
(15,366 posts)Peter Arnett's reporting from Baghdad, even censored as it was, was just too truthful for the BFEE to stand for. http://www.bbc.co.uk/journalism/blog/2009/08/cnn-reporting-from-baghdad-gul.shtml They never forgot it. See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Arnett
Once Faux Noise was launched under the stewardship of BFEE sycophant Roger Ailes, who is to the right of the loathed Rupert Murdoch, CNN was made to look somewhat stodgy in comparison. Instead of sticking to its guns, CNN started to imitate Faux too much and began its long downward spiral. What a shame! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel
Al Jazeera English is the only 24 hour news network to come anywhere close to CNN in its glory days, IMO.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And Headline News(HLN)no longer does headlines.
Why should anyone watch a network that no longer does what it came into business to do?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)It was 24/7, but in the wee hours they had re-run news. Same stories you saw at 5:00 pm and the same at 2:00 am. Boring 24/7 didn't mean good, just background noise on a Cocaine binge. LOL!
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)I'm glad its ratings reflect that.
democracy1st
(8,581 posts)No link to the original article!
CNN Is Terrible. Here's Why. by Jason Linkins & Elyse Siegel
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/04/cnn-is-terrible-heres-why_n_1478927.html
GTurck
(826 posts)CNN or Fox. Do watch some MSNBC and Current but only Rachel Maddow and Cenk Uiger, now that KO is gone. Watch FreeSpeechTV mostly for Democracy Now and Thom Hartmann but not every day.
We found that 24/7 news becomes distorted and tedious after the first report of an incident. Too much "news" that is inaccurate or over-reported is not healthy.
Too much "news" that is inaccurate or over-reported is not healthy.