Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
$25,000 to First Whistle-blower who turns-in Corporate secret donator to influence 2012 election
$25,000 Offered to First Employee to Blow the Whistle on Corporate Employers Secret Use of Corporate Treasury Money to Affect the Upcoming Electionhttp://www.commoncause.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=4773613&ct=11659913
[font size="3"]
Washington DC A large coalition of public interest, government reform, consumer, labor, grassroots and progressive organizations today announced a major national campaign to target corporations that use corporate treasury funds to influence the fall election, especially contributing to shadowy Super PACs or to 501c4s that run ads but are not legally obligated to disclose their donors. Groups include: Common Cause, Public Citizen, Coalition for Accountability in Political Spending (CAPS), Service Employees International Union, MoveOn.org, Americans United for Change, Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), Public Campaign Action Fund, Campaign for America's Future, National People's Action, Progress NOW, Every Child Matters, Health Care for America Now, Occupy Wall Street, and USAction. *SEE BELOW RELEASE FOR MORE DETAILS ON GROUPS PLANS.
Its bad enough for multi-millionaires to have such power in selecting our President, said Bill de Blasio, New York City Public Advocate, but the idea that when a consumer buys a pair of shoes, a TV or gasoline that part of their money should be used by a corporation to support a political candidate is simply unacceptable.
"The American public has had enough," said Bob Edgar of Common Cause. "'We the people' will not stand idly by while the country's major corporations use their massive wealth to buy our Democracy. We will do all we can to expose the corporate spending that threatens to drown out voters' voices."
Speaking at a press conference convened at the Service Employee International Union (SEIU), de Blasio said, We are putting every CEO in America on notice: if you choose to use corporate treasury funds to make donations to Super PACs or c4 organizations that are attempting to influence the upcoming election, you should inform your board before you do that you will be subjecting your firm to substantial potential economic risk.
<more>[/font]
I looked all over and couldn't find anything on this in MainStream media except for a very small piece in the los Angeles Times. NOt something the corporate media is interested in telling people about. If people are going to find out about this is will only be through word of mouth or personal emails. (I guess in the future we will have to discuss stuff like this quietly in a room with the radio playing very loud).
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2052 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$25,000 to First Whistle-blower who turns-in Corporate secret donator to influence 2012 election (Original Post)
Bill USA
May 2012
OP
silverweb
(16,402 posts)1. Hmmm...
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I wonder if any wikileakers got this memo... not that I'd encourage corporate spying or leaking or anything like that, of course!
pennylane100
(3,425 posts)2. does it have to be an employee
what about a really good hacker. (Big Brother, that was just a joke.)
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)3. I suspect that ...
the reward would have to be significantly more than $25K, and/or include a "we'll protect your identity" assurance, for anyone to produce a list. Because the divulging employee will be summarily terminated and, possibly/probably, sued for divulging confidential information. What's more, that employee would be unhireable into the distant, distant future.
$25 million, maybe; $25K, not a chance.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)4. I agree. It would have to be at least a million so the WB would not have to worry about ever getting
a job the rest of his life. ... and well, so he could hide out so he didn't get 'liquidated'.