Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 11:58 AM Jul 2021

The Harms of Infrastructure Privatization: A Step Backward in Progressive Policymaking

JULY 26, 2021

By Joseph Stiglitz

This week, the White House and congressional negotiators are working to hammer out a bipartisan infrastructure framework—one component of the Biden administration’s laser focus on upgrading crumbling infrastructure and making essential, long-overdue public investments that would be of enormous benefit to the country.

As always, however, the devil is in the details.

Specifically, the bipartisan framework lists several items as “proposed financing sources for new investment,” including public-private partnerships (P3s) and asset recycling. These proposals should be a cause for concern.

In many cases, such measures are back doors to privatization—with public funds paying for projects controlled by unaccountable private firms whose primary motive is to increase their own profits.

These kinds of proposals represent a misguided reversion to a neoliberal framework that has, for decades, widened economic inequality, prioritized extractive corporate power over people, and hollowed out our public capacity.

https://rooseveltinstitute.org/2021/07/26/the-harms-of-infrastructure-privatization-a-step-backward-in-progressive-policymaking/

Brief Biography of Joseph E. Stiglitz

Joseph E. Stiglitz is an American economist and a professor at Columbia University. He is also the co-chair of the High-Level Expert Group on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress at the OECD, and the Chief Economist of the Roosevelt Institute. A recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2001) and the John Bates Clark Medal (1979), he is a former senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank and a former member and chairman of the (US president's) Council of Economic Advisers. In 2000, Stiglitz founded the Initiative for Policy Dialogue, a think tank on international development based at Columbia University. He has been a member of the Columbia faculty since 2001 and received that university's highest academic rank (university professor) in 2003. In 2011 Stiglitz was named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world. Known for his pioneering work on asymmetric information, Stiglitz's work focuses on income distribution, risk, corporate governance, public policy, macroeconomics and globalization. He is the author of numerous books, and several bestsellers. His most recent titles are People, Power, and Profits, Rewriting the Rules of the European Economy, Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited, The Euro and Rewriting the Rules of the American Economy.

https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/bio


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Harms of Infrastructure Privatization: A Step Backward in Progressive Policymaking (Original Post) BeckyDem Jul 2021 OP
I'm feeling very jaded this morning but I fully expect the dems to accept public/private in2herbs Jul 2021 #1
Good points. BeckyDem Jul 2021 #2
And Guess Which Areas Will Get These modrepub Jul 2021 #3
Excellent article. CrispyQ Jul 2021 #4
My pleasure. BeckyDem Jul 2021 #5

in2herbs

(2,945 posts)
1. I'm feeling very jaded this morning but I fully expect the dems to accept public/private
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 12:35 PM
Jul 2021

partnerships in order to get things done -- and if they do it will be the worse mistake for our future. If private entities want to build infrastructure let them build it on the roads and everything else they have singly bought and paid for -- otherwise tax them so that the govt (us) can pay for it and will own it wholly and outright.

modrepub

(3,495 posts)
3. And Guess Which Areas Will Get These
Mon Jul 26, 2021, 01:02 PM
Jul 2021

Areas of high population density, typically Democratic leaning areas.

It only makes sense that the most profitable parts of the public infrastructure system are the ones that are more heavily used. Which, bridge has more traffic and thus high potential toll revenue, a bridge over the Hudson River in NYC or a bridge over the upper Susquehanna River on I-80? You don't build parking garages in small-town America, you build them in big cities where parking is at a premium.

Another way of shifting the burden to suburban and urban areas. Rural America will not see many of these types of public/private partnerships but I bet they'll get a cut of the revenue.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Harms of Infrastructu...