Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
America's Failures in Afghanistan Were Bipartisan and Long-Running
Americas failures in Afghanistan were thoroughly bipartisan and long in the making, and its retreat widely supported by the public.
@geraldfseib
asks: What does that tell us about ourselves?
Link to tweet
POLITICS | CAPITAL JOURNAL
Americas Failures in Afghanistan Were Bipartisan and Long-Running
The Afghanistan odyssey is coming to a tragic end. What have we learned?
Taliban Seize Power in Afghanistan: Whats Next
By Gerald F. Seib
https://twitter.com/GeraldFSeib
Jerry.Seib@wsj.com
Aug. 16, 2021 9:00 am ET
Early on during the adventure in Afghanistan, U.S. officials banned negotiations between the Afghan government and Taliban leaders, so confident were they that the Taliban Islamists could be vanquished militarily. By last year, U.S. officials themselves were negotiating directly with the Taliban, in talks in which the Afghan government was the party excluded.
That strange arc of diplomacy is as good an encapsulation as any of the long and misguided American odyssey through Afghanistan, now coming to a tragic end so ugly that it figures to haunt American foreign policy and the Biden presidency for some time to come.
The odyssey was thoroughly bipartisan, and in the end the retreat from it was widely supported by the public. In retrospect, it appears Americans lost their interest in Afghanistan when their leaders failed to keep showing that the exercise still was connected to its original and narrow purpose, which was to head off the threat of terrorism. Americans wanted victory over extremism, not an open-ended presence to make it less likely. Their leaders promised the former, and never prepared them for the latter.
All of that, in turn, raises questions about whether this superpower, unlike its imperial predecessors, is really cut out for this kind of long-term foreign adventure.
The war was started by a Republican president, the peak in troop strength reached under a Democratic president, the agreement to leave struck by another Republican president, that departure decision carried out by another Democratic president. Every one of those presidents learned what history should have taught about Afghanistan, which is that the local fighter always knows he will outlast the foreign occupier.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
SUBSCRIBE
SIGN IN
Americas Failures in Afghanistan Were Bipartisan and Long-Running
The Afghanistan odyssey is coming to a tragic end. What have we learned?
Taliban Seize Power in Afghanistan: Whats Next
By Gerald F. Seib
https://twitter.com/GeraldFSeib
Jerry.Seib@wsj.com
Aug. 16, 2021 9:00 am ET
Early on during the adventure in Afghanistan, U.S. officials banned negotiations between the Afghan government and Taliban leaders, so confident were they that the Taliban Islamists could be vanquished militarily. By last year, U.S. officials themselves were negotiating directly with the Taliban, in talks in which the Afghan government was the party excluded.
That strange arc of diplomacy is as good an encapsulation as any of the long and misguided American odyssey through Afghanistan, now coming to a tragic end so ugly that it figures to haunt American foreign policy and the Biden presidency for some time to come.
The odyssey was thoroughly bipartisan, and in the end the retreat from it was widely supported by the public. In retrospect, it appears Americans lost their interest in Afghanistan when their leaders failed to keep showing that the exercise still was connected to its original and narrow purpose, which was to head off the threat of terrorism. Americans wanted victory over extremism, not an open-ended presence to make it less likely. Their leaders promised the former, and never prepared them for the latter.
All of that, in turn, raises questions about whether this superpower, unlike its imperial predecessors, is really cut out for this kind of long-term foreign adventure.
The war was started by a Republican president, the peak in troop strength reached under a Democratic president, the agreement to leave struck by another Republican president, that departure decision carried out by another Democratic president. Every one of those presidents learned what history should have taught about Afghanistan, which is that the local fighter always knows he will outlast the foreign occupier.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
SUBSCRIBE
SIGN IN
Every one of those presidents learned what history should have taught about Afghanistan, which is that the local fighter always knows he will outlast the foreign occupier.
Maybe. In the fighting part of the American Civil War, the North outlasted the South. In Reconstruction, things went back to the way they were before the war.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 792 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
America's Failures in Afghanistan Were Bipartisan and Long-Running (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2021
OP
ZZenith
(4,119 posts)1. "Adventure." "Odyssey." What a load of disingenuous crap.
Naked money grab that had nothing to do with its stated purpose and inevitably ended in ignominy.
Thats all you need to know about Cheneys Folly.