When Military Contractors Fund Their Own Pro-War Think Tanks
On August 12, the military contractor CACI International Inc. told its investors that the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan is hurting its profits. The same contractor is also funding a think tank that is concurrently arguing against the withdrawal. This case is worth examining both because it is routine, and because it highlights the venality of our expert-military contractor feedback loop, in which private companies use think tanks to rally support for wars theyll profit from.
The contractor is notorious to those who have followed the scandal of U.S.-led torture in Iraq. CACI International was sued by three Iraqis formerly detained in Abu Ghraib prison who charge that the companys employees are responsible for directing their torture, including sexual assault and electric shocks. (The suit was brought in 2008 and the case is still ongoing.)
In 2019, CACI International was awarded a nearly $907 million, five-year contract to provide intelligence operations and analytic support for the U.S. Army in Afghanistan.
During an August 12 earnings call, CACI International noted repeatedly that President Bidens withdrawal from the 20-year Afghanistan War harmed the companys profits. John Mengucci, president and CEO of CACI International, said, we have about a 2 percent headwind coming into FY 2022 because of Afghanistan. A headwind refers to negative impacts on profits.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2021/08/29/when-military-contractors-fund-their-own-pro-war-think-tanks