'Are the Republican candidates all crazy?' (BBC)
By Mark Mardell - North America editor
I've lost count of the number of times over the Christmas break that people have asked me some variation of that question. Weird, mad or bonkers, whatever word they used their contemptuous dismissal was the same.
<snip>
Of course there is a long, if not honourable, tradition of regarding those you disagree with as off their rockers. And we Brits have a bit of a record of patronisingly shaking our heads at American quirkiness.
But the perception that there is something wrong with this year's crop of candidates isn't only across the Atlantic or confined by political persuasion.
A leading Republican, who was in Congress for more than 10 years, answered my question: "Who can beat Obama?" with a casual, "a mammal". Then he added sadly: "But they are all reptiles."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16386176
dimbear
(6,271 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)I have always said that if Obama got Bin Laden, he would be unbeatable. I'd LOVE to see what the republicans have to say about thefact that their boy not only let him go but actually said that he didn't think about him much, "that he didn't cross his mind"...REMEMBER THAT FELLAS?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Nixon said he discovered one, which meant that it did not exist
Lather, rinse, repeat....
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Gingrich or Paul? I gotta put a face on that line for full effect.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)it would be funny to see an amphibian criticizing the reptiles for not being mammals!
tavalon
(27,985 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,247 posts)To take that just one step further, there is precious little appeal for people of talent to associate with the Republican party in any way, including voting for its candidates. They have created a process of self-selection that favors the ignorant and thoughtless.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The pic of the day is the highlight of DU3
truthisfreedom
(23,139 posts)I wanted to repost it so badly!
Reagan! Jesus! MONKEY PANCAKES!
struggle4progress
(118,228 posts)with their leaders, and decided the problem was a lack of ideological purity ..."
Well, there it is in a nutshell: the Rs have been cultivating the wackos: Nixon decided to seek the Southern racists; Reagan added the religious fundamentalists and the anti-unisex-toilet crowd; the Bush gang brought in the laissez-faire Texas billionaires and the anti-intelligentsia and the "wouldn't World War III be cool!" gang and whatever other bottom-feeders Rove could scrape together; and by the time McCain was exhibiting Caribou Barbie as the party mascot, the rest of America was wondering who-the-fugg would ever vote for an R
freshwest
(53,661 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)independentLiberal
(15 posts)ron paul has some good ideas but, I disagree with his stance on the minimum wage
Rozlee
(2,529 posts)for women who are being sexually harassed in the workplace. His endorsement of the Personhood Pledge with 14th Amendment protections still has me steaming. It would bestow citizenship status on a fertilized egg and outlaw most forms of contraceptives including the Pill, IUD, morning after pill and all abortions including for rape and to save the mother's life. And the man was an OB/GYN! Plus, his tax plan, like all the others', would make the rich mega-richer and the rest of us devastatingly poorer.
Turbineguy
(37,291 posts)this is a rhetorical question.
provis99
(13,062 posts)pot calling the kettle black.
Kennah
(14,234 posts)I'd say the GOP is one part bat shit, and two parts crazy.