Scroungers and Strivers: We are encouraged to sneer at poverty and hardship
from In These Times:
Scroungers and Strivers
We are encouraged to sneer at poverty and hardship.
BY Jane Miller
'War on Want was a clever slogan that may even have characterised a time in the 50s and 60s when reducing, even eliminating, poverty, here and elsewhere in the world, was a serious hope and a proper endeavour. No longer. Now we in the UK are regaled daily with stories demonising the poor. They are shirkers and scroungers rather than the strivers and aspirers the rest of us are. We are asked to imagine members of hard-working families, habitually up at the crack of dawn and shocked to see the drawn blinds of the family next door, who are work-shy, fast asleep, and ensconced luxuriously in homes paid for by us heroic taxpayers. Andas they have nothing much else to do and anyway spend most of the day in bedthey are producing children at the rate of almost one a year. This isnt fair, were told.
New benefit rules and tax credit arrangements have been set in train to deal with this injustice inflicted on us by the poor. Feckless families will be evicted from their homes and sent to wherever there is cheaper, available housing, regardless of work, schools, family and friends. There is even a move to cut benefit to families who have more than two children.
The truth is that most of the poor do work, and are getting poorer all the time. Far more people are working part-time, often at several jobs. It has become essential for almost all women to work, yet more and more women are driven out of their modest part-time jobs by the soaring costs of child care. The coalition government talks about unemployment as if it were a chosen way of life rather than the tragedy it is for so many families these days.
Labour introduced the minimum wage in 1999. It currently stands at £6.19 an hour. Now there is a move across parties to encourage what is called a living wage of £7.45 an hour (£8.55 in London). Calling this a living wage reminds us that it is not possible, or even meant to be possible, to live on the minimum wage. However, this living wage would not be compulsory for employers, though if it were it would make an important difference to great numbers of their employees. The principal advantage of a living wage in government eyes would be that employers would subsidise the poor rather than the government, doing so on behalf of us trusty taxpayers; and in the process theyd be turning millions of parasites into usefully covetous consumers. One or two employers have actually gone for it: mostly banks, who have almost no low-paid workers, so it wont bother them. One hotel chain and one or two supermarkets are considering it. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/14304/scroungers_and_strivers