The Myth of American Productivity
Michael Mandel, Washington Monthly, Jan/Feb 2012
In 1939, when John Steinbeck completed The Grapes of Wratha heart-wrenching tale of a family of sharecroppers forced out of their home during the Depression roughly one-quarter of the U.S. population still lived on farms. Today, family farms are increasingly rare, and less than 2 percent of employed Americans work in agriculture.
But rather than viewing the decline of farming jobs as a tragedy, economists almost invariably count agriculture as a shining American successthe triumph of productivity. And why not? A handful of farmers using GPS-equipped combines and sophisticated moisture sensors can grow far more food than the population of an entire rural county in 1939. Food has become so plentiful and cheap in the United States that it has been blamed for the increase in obesity. And agricultural products have become one of the countrys chief exports, totaling more than $115 billion in 2010.
As the story of the American economy is usually told, the shrinkage of agricultural employment was a tough but essential part of the march toward higher incomes and a better standard of living. Whats more, this example has been cited time and again to explain subsequent upheavals in employment. In 2003, N. Greg Mankiw, a Harvard economist who then headed President George W. Bushs Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), told a Washington audience that the more recent fall in manufacturing jobs was an inescapable consequence of rapid productivity growth: The long-term trends that we have recently seen in manufacturing mirror what we saw in agriculture a couple of generations ago.
In a 2006 speech, University of Chicago professor Austan Goolsbee made the same point, explaining why the long-term decline in manufacturing jobs didnt worry him. Employment in the (manufacturing) sector and the share of spending in the sector get smaller and smaller almost as proof of how productive it has become, said Goolsbee, then a top economic advisor to Senator Barack Obama and more recently CEA head under President Obama. It is exactly the same process that agriculture went through.
full: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/january_february_2012/features/the_myth_of_american_productiv034576.php?page=all
stockholmer
(3,751 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)This is a must read.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)He missed "Lop sided Trade Agreements
Hedge Fund Managers manipulating Raw Material Prices
Tax Incentives for Off Shoring Manufacturing facilities
ciaoant1
(28 posts)Work till you drop (?)
http://whataboutmarx.blogspot.com/2012/01/greater-productivity-and-eight-hour-day.html
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)But heres the rub: both of these corporate strategies domestic productivity improvements and global supply chain managementshow up as productivity gains in U.S. economic records. When federal statisticians calculate the nations economic output, what they are actually measuring is domestic value addedthe dollar value of all sales minus the dollar value of all imports. Productivity is then calculated by dividing the quantity of value added by the number of American workers. American workers, however, often have little to do with the gains in productivity attributed to them. For instance, if Company A saves $250,000 simply by switching from a Japanese sprocket supplier to a much cheaper Chinese sprocket supplier, that change shows up as an increase in American productivityjust as if the company had saved $250,000 by making its warehouse operation in Chicago more efficient.