Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Nancy Pelosi: We need more women in politics
The Minority Leader discusses feminism, Nancy Drew and how we can create an environment that empowers women
By Chloe Angyal
Tuesday, Mar 12, 2013 11:57 AM EDT
... Nancy Pelosi: ... Its interesting to note .... that in the last Congress, the Senate, in a bipartisan way, passed the Violence Against Women Act, but it took almost another year for it to be passed in the House and for another bill to be passed in the Senate. Its interesting that 138 Republicans voted against it; its stunning to me. I understand almost everything around here, from the standpoint of understanding motivation and constituencies, but for 138 to vote against the Violence Against Women Act is taking it all to a new place in terms of their lack of understanding of what the challenges are that women face.
And then the sequester takes $20 million right out of Violence Against Women funding. But the sequester act is harmful to women in so many other ways. Many of the jobs lost will be lost by women. Since the end of the recession, women have lost more jobs in the public sector, and further cuts in the public sector, as well as the impact that has on the private sector, will hurt women. The issues that relate to women and families, whether its WIC, whether its Head Start or other initiatives like that We have a situation where because the Republicans refuse to close special interest tax breaks, they instead choose to reduce funding for military families, and that affects women, and healthcare for military families, and that affects women, reduced funding for Meals of Wheels four million Meals on Wheels will be cut, and many of those seniors are women and many of their caregivers are women all because they want to protect corporate jet tax breaks and tax breaks for corporations sending jobs overseas. They dont want millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share, and thats why well lose 750, 000 jobs, many of them women. Its just a stunning display of their value system, and its very harmful to women ...
We need to have women in elected positions to make their voices heard and to get policy improved, but its important because of what it means in the lives of Americas families, and I think the big challenge that we have is achieving public policy for quality, affordable childcare. I see it historically. The suffragettes fought for the right to vote over ninety years ago. And then World War II, women in the workplace, out of the home and into the workplace. Then the higher education of women in the next couple of decades after that. Then women in the professions. But the missing piece all along has been affordable quality childcare. And its not just the responsibility of the mom, but largely it has been, and if were going to unleash the intellect, the determination and courage of women, the clarity of thinking of women, onto the world, we need affordable quality childcare.
If you reduce the role of money in politics and increase the level of civility, youll have more women elected to public office, and sooner, and that nothing is more wholesome to the governmental and political process than increased participation of women. Im very proud of what weve done, weve increased the number of women in the House, especially on the Democratic side, but its not enough. Were talking incrementally all the time and I think we need to be talking in a different way; we need to make our own environment. We cant just sit back and say, Well, we got ten more, and soon well have eight more, and in two hundred more years well be at parity. No, I think we say, What are the factors that inhibit the increased role of women? ...
And then the sequester takes $20 million right out of Violence Against Women funding. But the sequester act is harmful to women in so many other ways. Many of the jobs lost will be lost by women. Since the end of the recession, women have lost more jobs in the public sector, and further cuts in the public sector, as well as the impact that has on the private sector, will hurt women. The issues that relate to women and families, whether its WIC, whether its Head Start or other initiatives like that We have a situation where because the Republicans refuse to close special interest tax breaks, they instead choose to reduce funding for military families, and that affects women, and healthcare for military families, and that affects women, reduced funding for Meals of Wheels four million Meals on Wheels will be cut, and many of those seniors are women and many of their caregivers are women all because they want to protect corporate jet tax breaks and tax breaks for corporations sending jobs overseas. They dont want millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share, and thats why well lose 750, 000 jobs, many of them women. Its just a stunning display of their value system, and its very harmful to women ...
We need to have women in elected positions to make their voices heard and to get policy improved, but its important because of what it means in the lives of Americas families, and I think the big challenge that we have is achieving public policy for quality, affordable childcare. I see it historically. The suffragettes fought for the right to vote over ninety years ago. And then World War II, women in the workplace, out of the home and into the workplace. Then the higher education of women in the next couple of decades after that. Then women in the professions. But the missing piece all along has been affordable quality childcare. And its not just the responsibility of the mom, but largely it has been, and if were going to unleash the intellect, the determination and courage of women, the clarity of thinking of women, onto the world, we need affordable quality childcare.
If you reduce the role of money in politics and increase the level of civility, youll have more women elected to public office, and sooner, and that nothing is more wholesome to the governmental and political process than increased participation of women. Im very proud of what weve done, weve increased the number of women in the House, especially on the Democratic side, but its not enough. Were talking incrementally all the time and I think we need to be talking in a different way; we need to make our own environment. We cant just sit back and say, Well, we got ten more, and soon well have eight more, and in two hundred more years well be at parity. No, I think we say, What are the factors that inhibit the increased role of women? ...
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 822 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nancy Pelosi: We need more women in politics (Original Post)
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
OP
freshwest
(53,661 posts)1. Good.
grilled onions
(1,957 posts)2. They Have So Many Disadvantages
They often lack the money,the clout to get involved. Many churches frown on their female members to get the masculine side of politics. They think they are fine to bake the cookies or shuffle papers but really should stay off the campaign trail.
But isn't it odd(or maybe it isn't) that almost all the issues of woman,about women, against women are voted on by the men. T his alone should have many more women fighting for a political career as well as the rights of women everywhere.