Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Battle for Bauhaus How A Movement Failed to Protect Its Name
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,807202,00.htmlGermany's famous Bauhaus school from 1919 to 1933 forged new boundaries in the art and design world and remains highly influential today. But its brand and legacy has been under threat for five decades from a large German-Swiss home goods retailer that took the title and trademark "Bauhaus" in 1960 and now has 190 stores around Europe.
Architect Walter Gropius and his group of communal craftsmen put a radical stamp on architecture, design and art education during Germany's Weimar Period between the two world wars. He even claims he coined the term "Bauhaus" as the name for his atypical art school.
Along the way, though, he forgot an important thing: to protect the name.
As a result, up to 40 companies in Germany and myriad others abroad have taken the word "Bauhaus" as a brand or title. The imitators include a furniture label in the United States, a rumored bordello in Japan, a chocolate variety that touts its form and function, a real estate company and the early British gothic band led by Peter Murphy.
"Bauhaus sells," says Dr. Annemarie Jaeggi, director of the Bauhaus Archive Museum in Berlin. "That's the point." When someone is copying you or your name in a corporate context, she says, "then you see that you really have a brand."
But the greatest squatter of the moniker is a do-it-yourself retailer based in Mannheim, which trademarked the Bauhaus during postwar divided Germany. It happened before Gropius and others moved to established archives and museums -- in Dessau and Weimar (in the former east) and Berlin -- to explain and protect the historical Bauhaus and its legacy. Now, it's causing confusion to the general public and frustration to Bauhaus design aficionados.
Letters between Walter Gropius (pictured here in 1933 in Chicago) and Mies van der Rohe in 1967 indicate they noticed the name being used by other institutions. "I want it today," Mies van der Rohe wrote to Gropius in 1967. But a court in 1972 ruled in favor of DIY store Bauhaus AG, saying the term Bauhaus can "no longer be attributed to a specific person, but has become a style concept that is part of the public domain."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 2784 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Battle for Bauhaus How A Movement Failed to Protect Its Name (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2012
OP
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. There's a little settlement in Wellfleet MA .built by
Bauhaus students of design & architecture , Quintessential Bauhaus .
Solly Mack
(90,730 posts)2. and a very popular store it is in Mannheim
I miss Mannheim.