Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinto

(106,886 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 06:58 PM Mar 2013

Ensuring Public Health Neutrality (New Eng Jour Med)

Ensuring Public Health Neutrality

Les F. Roberts, Ph.D., M.P.H., and Michael J. VanRooyen, M.D., M.P.H.
N Engl J Med 2013, March 21, 2013

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1300197?query=TOC

In June 1968, a clearly marked Swedish Red Cross plane flying relief supplies into the breakaway state of Biafra was shot down by Nigerian fighters.1 Before the war was over, many relief planes would be shot down and far more would crash because the Nigerian government's shoot-to-kill order forced them to fly at night. The brazen targeting of Red Cross relief flights on civilian humanitarian missions was hard to imagine. In the minds of some people, however, these attacks were justified by another clear violation of humanitarian neutrality: on at least one occasion, a plane painted with the Red Cross insignia was actually carrying weapons.2,3 That rare instance of military action masquerading as humanitarian relief completely undermined the neutrality of everyone who operated by the accepted rules of humanitarian assistance, cost the lives of both aid workers and aid recipients, and provided a blanket of impunity for the future criminal actions of the Nigerian government.

To underscore the necessity of humanitarian neutrality, 12 deans from prominent U.S. schools of public health sent a letter to President Barack Obama on January 6, 2013, protesting the conduct of a sham vaccination campaign as part of the hunt for Osama bin Laden.4 In the lead-up to the May 1, 2011, targeting of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) reportedly hired a Pakistani surgeon named Shakil Afridi to go house to house vaccinating children but also drawing back a little blood in the syringe in order to analyze the DNA of the household members. The ploy appears not to have worked in the bin Laden compound, since Afridi's team was kicked out. Nonetheless, in a 60 Minutes interview last June, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that Afridi was helpful in finding bin Laden.5 In May 2012, Afridi was convicted of treason and sentenced to 33 years in prison.

Because of these events, Pakistan expelled the foreign staff of the international aid agency Save the Children from the country in September 2012 — a move that threatened the network of health and development services that the organization had established over the past 30 years. In December, eight polio vaccination workers were killed in an apparently coordinated set of attacks (see photoProtests after the Killing of Vaccination Workers in Pakistan.), and the United Nations has suspended its polio-eradication efforts in Pakistan, where 150,000 children die of vaccine-preventable illnesses each year. After decades of a global campaign funded largely by the U.S. government and recently by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, polio has been eradicated from all but three countries: Afghanistan, Nigeria, and Pakistan. It has taken many years and hundreds of millions of dollars to bring us to the brink of global eradication of polio, an achievement that appears to have been made much more difficult by the CIA's actions.

The deans of the schools of public health asked the President to commit the United States to refraining from disguising military or intelligence actions as public health activities. Defending the interests of global public health workers, they wrote, “International public health work builds peace and is one of the most constructive means by which our past, present, and future public health students can pursue a life of fulfillment and service. Please do not allow that outlet of common good to be closed to them because of political and/or security interests that ignore the type of unintended negative public health impacts we are witnessing in Pakistan.”

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1300197?query=TOC

Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ensuring Public Health Neutrality (New Eng Jour Med) (Original Post) pinto Mar 2013 OP
And rightly so. It's a very old problem(*), and that was a very bad thing(@) to do. bemildred Mar 2013 #1

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
1. And rightly so. It's a very old problem(*), and that was a very bad thing(@) to do.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 10:29 PM
Mar 2013

(*) -- Entangling public health services in political/police actions

(@) - thereby endangering public health workers by putting them under a cloud of suspicion as police/government agents

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Ensuring Public Health Ne...