Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 07:15 PM Mar 2013

Conservative Christians Lose It and Threaten President Obama, the GOP, and the Supreme Court


Conservative Christians Lose It and Threaten President Obama, the GOP, and the Supreme Court

Militarism is the belief that a group should maintain strong military capabilities and be prepared to use them aggressively to promote their interests, and it may imply the justification of conflict to administer a group’s policy on its enemies. Over the course of the past few years, conservatives have threatened various levels of conflict to impose their particular agenda on the government and American people whether it was opposition to healthcare reform when teabaggers attended protests claiming “we came unarmed this time,” or threats of race, civil, or revolutionary war over gun safety laws and the election of an African American president. Whatever various conservative groups’ causes, their reason for threatening conflict is always their opposition to the government’s right to enact laws within the tenets of the U.S. Constitution. During the Supreme Court hearings on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s Prop 8 that banned same-sex marriage, conservative Christians became the latest group to use marshal language to express their outrage at the prospect the Constitution forbids them from imposing their religious morality on the entire nation.

A little reported exchange during arguments in favor of perpetuating inequality in America was Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s reading a line from the House Report justifying DOMA’s passage in 1996 that defined the law’s entire legal underpinning. It said, “Congress decided to reflect and honor a moral judgment and to express moral disapproval of homosexuality.” That one line is all the reason the High Court needs to strike down the law on two counts; it is rank, government-sanctioned discrimination, and it is straight out of the Christian bible making it a direct violation of the 1st Amendment’s prohibition on establishment of a state religion. Conservative Christians, meanwhile, fearing the prospect the Court may strike down the law, immediately took up a militaristic posture leading one influential conservative Iowa talk radio host to say, “It’s going to raise the issue to Orange Threat Level, it’ll be DEFCON 6,” and his warning was repeated across the country.

In Texas, about 250 opponents of same-sex marriage assembled at the Capitol to hear the state’s Republican leadership promise that Texas will remain a bastion of “freedom, family and faith,” and that “the hope of America is Texas” according to state Sen. Ken Paxton. The state’s lieutenant governor, David Dewhurst, kept up the battle-field rhetoric and inflamed rally-goers claiming that conservative values were under steady assault from President Barack Obama and his administration, and that “Over our dead bodies are we going to let this state turn blue.” Another Texas Republican, state Senator Donna Campbell said “Our core values are being attacked on a daily basis … by government fiat in our courts and in our schools. They want to redefine the Constitution and it’s just not going to stand with me” and promised that Christian values would be defended here “because there is no other Texas to move to.” Steve Deace, who warned the threat level was elevating to DEFCON6 said “these people have invested decades in this fight and they are not going to throw up their hands, they’re going to double down, it’s going to be even nastier.”

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.politicususa.com/ive-christians-lose-threaten-president-obama-gop-supreme-court.html


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservative Christians Lose It and Threaten President Obama, the GOP, and the Supreme Court (Original Post) Tx4obama Mar 2013 OP
Violence is coming. onehandle Mar 2013 #1
I hope they don't expect haikugal Mar 2013 #2
I wonder... shenmue Mar 2013 #3
Sabre rattling davidthegnome Mar 2013 #4
Facepalm... Aristus Mar 2013 #5
Good catch. But ... Tx4obama Mar 2013 #7
Context. Aristus Mar 2013 #8
Well then it looks like the author must have made a boo-boo :) n/t Tx4obama Mar 2013 #9
Conservative Christians can take their fucked-up version of religious morality seemingly indepat Mar 2013 #6
Here, here!! Isoldeblue Mar 2013 #10
I take umbrage at those who wear "Christianity" on their sleeve all the while embracing greed, indepat Mar 2013 #15
Is there any other country John2 Mar 2013 #11
If the hope of America is Texas... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2013 #12
Every state has its own share of nuts. Tx4obama Mar 2013 #13
True, and I live in Texas and voted for Obama... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2013 #14
Teh Stoopid is all around us Mopar151 Mar 2013 #16

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
4. Sabre rattling
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 07:43 PM
Mar 2013

These people do not scare me. If it ever comes to any sort of armed conflict, I expect that our armed forces would put it down very quickly - very hard. They can't be so stupid that they aren't aware of that.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
7. Good catch. But ...
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:52 PM
Mar 2013

the words 'marshal' with one 'L' can be used as a transitive verb.

-snip-
1: to place in proper rank or position <marshaling the troops>
2: to bring together and order in an appropriate or effective way <marshal arguments>
3: to lead ceremoniously or solicitously : usher <marshaling her little group of children down the street>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marshal



I don't have a clue about what is correct or incorrect in the case of the OP.


Aristus

(66,276 posts)
8. Context.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:13 PM
Mar 2013

'Militarism' is the first word in the article. So 'martial' would seem to be the correct term here.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
6. Conservative Christians can take their fucked-up version of religious morality seemingly
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:24 PM
Mar 2013

comprised mostly of greed, disingenuousness, and exclusion, and stick it up the oh-so-holy asshole of each person of their oh-so-holy ilk.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
15. I take umbrage at those who wear "Christianity" on their sleeve all the while embracing greed,
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 03:14 PM
Mar 2013

avarice, exclusion, and attempting to thrust their version of a very un-Christian-like religious morality on the rest of us through the political process.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
11. Is there any other country
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:24 AM
Mar 2013

they can move to and practice their religious Intolerance. The only countries I know of are Islamic countries that have religion as their Constitution. I don't think the American Constitution was written based on Christianity. It had more to do with human rights than religion.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
13. Every state has its own share of nuts.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 01:49 AM
Mar 2013

Millions of Texans voted for Obama in 2008 and in 2012.

There is always the 'hope' that Texas will turn blue soon



 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
14. True, and I live in Texas and voted for Obama...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 01:53 AM
Mar 2013

but when I look around me (in DFW) I am dismayed by the amount of dumb fucks that surround me.

Mopar151

(9,974 posts)
16. Teh Stoopid is all around us
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 05:33 PM
Mar 2013

I'm in NH, and most of the difference is the dumbfuck/decent people ratio. That, and we have enough decent, centrist Republicans who are appaled by the antics of the Teahadist minority to keep the fools (somewhat) in check.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Conservative Christians L...