Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tace

(6,800 posts)
Thu May 23, 2013, 08:56 PM May 2013

No Mo' PoMo? | James Howard Kunstler



James Howard Kunstler -- World News Trust

May 13, 2013

Whenever the Federal Reserve wants to tweak the dials of the economy -- or pretend that it can -- it turns first to its sock puppet at The Wall Street Journal, Jon Hilsenrath, and "leaks" a rumor of policy change (HERE). They like to do this late on Fridays when financial markets are about to close, so that market players will have a whole weekend to ponder the Fed's actions like medieval viziers reading goat entrails.

Last Friday's puddle of steaming guts was a supposed preview of the Fed's "exit strategy" from its reckless policy of "quantitative easing" or "money" creation (or "liquidity," if you like). In other words, they supposedly intend to stop juicing the financial markets with fake wealth, i.e. capital not accumulated from real productive activity, but just fictively created on computer hard drives. For the past year they have been doing this to the tune of $85 billion a month, "buying" U.S. Treasury bonds and bills and an assortment of miscellaneous securities (mostly trash that can't be pawned off on anyone else) through their so-called "primary dealer" bank cohorts, the too-big-to-fail usual suspects, who "earn" hefty transaction fees in the process of conveying all these pixels from Point A to Point B. These interventions are called Permanent Open Market Operations, or PoMo.

The theory all along has been that this $85 billion a month would seep down to Main Street to provoke spending (increasing the "velocity of money) and therefore "jump start" the economy. The theory has proven itself to be complete horseshit, of course. All it has done is suppress interest rates on bonds, depriving old people of income off their savings by so doing. It also artificially jacked up reckless lending on loans for houses, cars, and college degrees, juiced the share price of stocks, and boosted food prices. Meanwhile, an increasingly former middle class languishes in a purgatory of foreclosure, penury, and desperation. The Fed can't really do anything to help them. It can only burden them with more easy-credit debt, especially their college-age children. But ours is a financialized economy and finance is too abstruse for most ordinary people to understand, so they just muddle along in a fog of dashed hopes and repossession.

more

http://worldnewstrust.com/no-mo-pomo-james-howard-kunstler
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Mo' PoMo? | James Howard Kunstler (Original Post) Tace May 2013 OP
G-d, you are good, Jim. leveymg May 2013 #1
quantitative easing makes me suspect the whole house of cards is about to collapse yurbud May 2013 #2
k&r n/t RainDog May 2013 #3
Wasn't Kunstler chucked under the bus next to Malthus? IDemo May 2013 #4

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
2. quantitative easing makes me suspect the whole house of cards is about to collapse
Sun May 26, 2013, 02:12 PM
May 2013

It's like a kidney patient who has to get dialysis more and more often--he's either going to need a transplant soon or die.

There seems to be no imminent major policy transplant coming.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
4. Wasn't Kunstler chucked under the bus next to Malthus?
Mon May 27, 2013, 09:10 PM
May 2013

It's so crowded under there anymore, it's hard to keep track of everybody.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»No Mo' PoMo? »