Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 03:40 PM Sep 2013

The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts

Long before he brought people into his laboratory at Columbia University to smoke crack cocaine, Carl Hart saw its effects firsthand. Growing up in poverty, he watched relatives become crack addicts, living in squalor and stealing from their mothers. Childhood friends ended up in prisons and morgues.

Those addicts seemed enslaved by crack, like the laboratory rats that couldn’t stop pressing the lever for cocaine even as they were starving to death. The cocaine was providing such powerful dopamine stimulation to the brain’s reward center that the addicts couldn’t resist taking another hit.

At least, that was how it looked to Dr. Hart when he started his research career in the 1990s. Like other scientists, he hoped to find a neurological cure to addiction, some mechanism for blocking that dopamine activity in the brain so that people wouldn’t succumb to the otherwise irresistible craving for cocaine, heroin and other powerfully addictive drugs.

But then, when he began studying addicts, he saw that drugs weren’t so irresistible after all.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/science/the-rational-choices-of-crack-addicts.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1379446511-dR6fD0R7xhEXLvcHNa6dbw
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts (Original Post) SecularMotion Sep 2013 OP
This is obviously junk science. jollyreaper2112 Sep 2013 #1
saw him on C-Span Booknotes KT2000 Sep 2013 #2
Interesting. And I see the article quotes David Nutt, Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #3

jollyreaper2112

(1,941 posts)
1. This is obviously junk science.
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

It's removing a perfectly good, scientifically-sound basis for discriminating against black and poor people. Why wasn't this man's funding cut with the sequester?

This post sarcasm-enriched(tm).

KT2000

(20,577 posts)
2. saw him on C-Span Booknotes
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 05:35 PM
Sep 2013

very interesting information. He is all about dispelling myths that prop up the war on drugs and replacing it with the truth.
He said that the majority of heroin deaths are caused by taking barbiturates or alcohol while doing heroin.
There never was a crack baby epidemic.
and more

He is a brave guy to go up against the party line, IMHO.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
3. Interesting. And I see the article quotes David Nutt,
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 07:15 PM
Sep 2013

the British neuropsychopharmacologist who also went against the "party line" by pointing out that ecstasy is less dangerous than horseback riding (because of this, he was forced out of his position on the government advisory board).

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Rational Choices of C...