Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:03 PM Nov 2013

Death of a Professor

By L.V. Anderson

On Friday, Aug. 16, Margaret Mary Vojtko, an adjunct French professor who’d recently lost her job at Duquesne University at the age of 83, suffered a heart attack on a street corner in Homestead, Pa. Vojtko collapsed yards from the house where she had lived almost her entire life. She was rushed to the hospital, but she never regained consciousness. Vojtko died on Sunday, Sept. 1.

Two and a half weeks later, Vojtko’s lawyer, Daniel Kovalik, published an op-ed about Vojtko called “Death of an Adjunct” in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Kovalik wrote that “unlike a well-paid tenured professor, Margaret Mary worked on a contract basis from semester to semester, with no job security, no benefits, and with a salary of $3,000 to $3,500 per three-credit course.” (In fact, for many years, she’d earned less—only $2,556 per course.) She’d been receiving cancer treatment, he said, and she’d become essentially homeless over the winter because she couldn’t afford to maintain and heat her house. Then, in the spring, she’d been told that her contract wouldn’t be extended after the current semester. A social worker from a local government agency had been tipped off that she might need help taking care of herself, which horrified Vojtko—“For a proud professional like Margaret Mary, this was the last straw,” according to the op-ed.

Kovalik, the senior associate general counsel at the United Steelworkers, faulted Duquesne for failing to do more to help Vojtko and for refusing to recognize a union, formed by its adjunct professors with his help, which would have fought for better pay, benefits, and job security. Kovalik’s not-so-subtle implication was that if Duquesne had negotiated, Vojtko might not have died the way she did.

Sites like the Chronicle of Higher Education, the Huffington Post, and Gawker quickly picked up the story, and Kovalik’s op-ed racked up more than 438,000 page views and 69,000 Facebook likes. Vojtko’s death especially struck a nerve with academics and graduate students, who saw shades of their own futures in her apparent abandonment. They took to Twitter with the hashtag #IamMargaretMary. “So many of us are walking into academic careers destined to be haunted w/ the same sort of contingency,” read one typical tweet. “#Adjunct labour in #HigherEd makes a more tangible product than #WallSt, & rakes in money for schools, but gets peanuts,” read another. One professor titled his blog post about Vojtko’s death: “This Job Can Kill You. Literally.”

more

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/education/2013/11/death_of_duquesne_adjunct_margaret_mary_vojtko_what_really_happened_to_her.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Death of a Professor (Original Post) n2doc Nov 2013 OP
Why does this make me so angry? daleanime Nov 2013 #1
I have to wonder why enlightenment Nov 2013 #2
all the personal attack stuff was irrelevant and when administrators ding someone for not using tech yurbud Nov 2013 #3

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
2. I have to wonder why
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:54 PM
Nov 2013

the author of this piece felt it necessary to completely trash the character of Margaret Mary Vojtko? What purpose did that serve, since she ends the piece criticizing Duquesne for their refusal to negotiate with the adjunct union and suggesting that they could serve as a role model for positive change instead of maintaining the status quo?

Her assumption that Margaret Mary would have behaved in precisely the same fashion if her circumstances had been different - i.e., if she had been paid a decent wage and benefits for working full-time for two decades - is unsupported by fact. It appears that she is trying to divorce Vojtko's situation from the reality of being an adjunct . . . and she doesn't do it very well.

It is unfortunate; Slate could have published a strong piece on why this hidden disgrace of higher education continues unabated - instead, they serve up a hit piece on a dead woman that tacks on a brief discussion of the actual issue at the end.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
3. all the personal attack stuff was irrelevant and when administrators ding someone for not using tech
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 05:23 PM
Nov 2013

that is petty and stupid.

I'm pretty tech savvy, but I only use tech that will make things easier for me, my students, or both.

Some administrators seem to think the shit is magic and we should just use it for the sake of using it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Death of a Professor