Death of a Professor
By L.V. Anderson
On Friday, Aug. 16, Margaret Mary Vojtko, an adjunct French professor whod recently lost her job at Duquesne University at the age of 83, suffered a heart attack on a street corner in Homestead, Pa. Vojtko collapsed yards from the house where she had lived almost her entire life. She was rushed to the hospital, but she never regained consciousness. Vojtko died on Sunday, Sept. 1.
Two and a half weeks later, Vojtkos lawyer, Daniel Kovalik, published an op-ed about Vojtko called Death of an Adjunct in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Kovalik wrote that unlike a well-paid tenured professor, Margaret Mary worked on a contract basis from semester to semester, with no job security, no benefits, and with a salary of $3,000 to $3,500 per three-credit course. (In fact, for many years, shed earned lessonly $2,556 per course.) Shed been receiving cancer treatment, he said, and shed become essentially homeless over the winter because she couldnt afford to maintain and heat her house. Then, in the spring, shed been told that her contract wouldnt be extended after the current semester. A social worker from a local government agency had been tipped off that she might need help taking care of herself, which horrified VojtkoFor a proud professional like Margaret Mary, this was the last straw, according to the op-ed.
Kovalik, the senior associate general counsel at the United Steelworkers, faulted Duquesne for failing to do more to help Vojtko and for refusing to recognize a union, formed by its adjunct professors with his help, which would have fought for better pay, benefits, and job security. Kovaliks not-so-subtle implication was that if Duquesne had negotiated, Vojtko might not have died the way she did.
Sites like the Chronicle of Higher Education, the Huffington Post, and Gawker quickly picked up the story, and Kovaliks op-ed racked up more than 438,000 page views and 69,000 Facebook likes. Vojtkos death especially struck a nerve with academics and graduate students, who saw shades of their own futures in her apparent abandonment. They took to Twitter with the hashtag #IamMargaretMary. So many of us are walking into academic careers destined to be haunted w/ the same sort of contingency, read one typical tweet. #Adjunct labour in #HigherEd makes a more tangible product than #WallSt, & rakes in money for schools, but gets peanuts, read another. One professor titled his blog post about Vojtkos death: This Job Can Kill You. Literally.
more
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/education/2013/11/death_of_duquesne_adjunct_margaret_mary_vojtko_what_really_happened_to_her.html
daleanime
(17,796 posts)enlightenment
(8,830 posts)the author of this piece felt it necessary to completely trash the character of Margaret Mary Vojtko? What purpose did that serve, since she ends the piece criticizing Duquesne for their refusal to negotiate with the adjunct union and suggesting that they could serve as a role model for positive change instead of maintaining the status quo?
Her assumption that Margaret Mary would have behaved in precisely the same fashion if her circumstances had been different - i.e., if she had been paid a decent wage and benefits for working full-time for two decades - is unsupported by fact. It appears that she is trying to divorce Vojtko's situation from the reality of being an adjunct . . . and she doesn't do it very well.
It is unfortunate; Slate could have published a strong piece on why this hidden disgrace of higher education continues unabated - instead, they serve up a hit piece on a dead woman that tacks on a brief discussion of the actual issue at the end.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)that is petty and stupid.
I'm pretty tech savvy, but I only use tech that will make things easier for me, my students, or both.
Some administrators seem to think the shit is magic and we should just use it for the sake of using it.