Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,236 posts)
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 07:21 PM Nov 2013

Assange not under sealed indictment, U.S. officials say

By Sari Horwitz
Monday, November 18, 5:24 PM

... “Nothing has occurred so far,” said one law enforcement official with knowledge of the case. “If Assange came to the U.S. today, he would not be arrested. But I can’t predict what’s going to happen. He might be in six months.”

The Justice Department, at least for now, appears to be drawing a distinction between those who were government employees or contractors and who were required by law to protect classified information, and those who received and published the material.

The Justice Department has unsealed an indictment charging former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden under the Espionage Act. Snowden, who fled to Hong Kong and then Russia, leaked tens of thousands of documents about U.S. surveillance programs that have led to reports in The Washington Post and the Guardian, among other publications around the world.

“Snowden was a person who swore an oath, an employee of the National Security Agency,” said a second senior U.S. official, drawing a line between Snowden’s legal obligations and responsibility, and someone like Assange ...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/assange-not-under-sealed-indictment-us-officials-say/2013/11/18/8a3cb2da-506c-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Assange not under sealed indictment, U.S. officials say (Original Post) struggle4progress Nov 2013 OP
Interesting. WaPo has now removed the words "he would not be arrested" Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #1
That's odd -- and no acknowledgement on the page of an edit, either struggle4progress Nov 2013 #2

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
1. Interesting. WaPo has now removed the words "he would not be arrested"
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 01:46 AM
Nov 2013
WaPo changes quote from unnamed official re Assange arrest

http://pastebin.com/RV3pqnbL

"Nothing has occurred so far. If Assange came to the US today, he would not be arrested. But I can't predict what's going to happen. He might be in six months."
(via http://www.news.com.au/world/us-justice-official-says-there-are-no-secret-arrest-warrants-for-julian-assange/story-fndir2ev-1226763139095)

New quote in the Washington Post article:

“Nothing has occurred so far. But it’s subject to change. I can’t predict what’s going to happen. The investigation is ongoing.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/assange-not-under-sealed-indictment-us-officials-say/2013/11/18/8a3cb2da-506c-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Assange not under sealed ...