Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 11:04 AM Nov 2013

Revealed: How British Empire’s dirty secrets went up in smoke in the colonies


In April 1957, five unmarked lorries left the British High Commission in Kuala Lumpur and drove to a Royal Navy base in Singapore with their cargo of files detailing the secrets of Britain’s rule in Malaya. Their destination was, in the words of one official, a “splendid incinerator”.
This “discreet” mission in the closing days of British rule over what became Malaysia was one of hundreds of similar operations. As the sun finally set on the Empire, diplomats scurried to repatriate or destroy hundreds of thousands “dirty” documents containing evidence that London had decided should never see the light of day. Some 50 years later, the sheer scale of the operation to hide the secrets of British rule overseas – including details of atrocities committed during the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya – is revealed in documents released today by the National Archives in Kew, west London.

The so-called “migrated archive” details the extraordinary lengths to which the Colonial Office went to withhold information from its former subjects in at least 23 countries and territories in the 1950s and 1960s.

Among the documents is a memo from London that required all secret documents held abroad to be vetted by a Special Branch or MI5 liaison officer to ensure that any papers which might “embarrass” Britain or show “racial prejudice or religious bias” were destroyed or sent home.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/revealed-how-british-empires-dirty-secrets-went-up-in-smoke-in-the-colonies-8971217.html
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revealed: How British Empire’s dirty secrets went up in smoke in the colonies (Original Post) jakeXT Nov 2013 OP
These days dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #1
Not smashed ? / nt jakeXT Nov 2013 #2
I'm told dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #3
You have to be thorough. You have to make the disc unusable. bemildred Nov 2013 #4
Actually it's not that easy anymore DrDebug Nov 2013 #5
Well, It's true I haven't taken one apart in a while. bemildred Nov 2013 #6
even if you destroy the drive perfectly, if it was ever connected to the internet... yurbud Dec 2013 #7
Yep. They can live on. It's not hard to do. nt bemildred Dec 2013 #8
essentially, destroying hard drives is a government intimidation through vandalism tactic yurbud Dec 2013 #11
LOL - "tiny 80 Gb HD" - my first computer had a 20 MEGABYTE HD ConcernedCanuk Dec 2013 #9
Mine too ;) DrDebug Dec 2013 #10
My first Mac Plus had a 30 MB hard drive, the size of a big city phone book yurbud Dec 2013 #12
Yep, 640K and 20 Meg, you had to pay lot more for 30 Meg. bemildred Dec 2013 #13

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. You have to be thorough. You have to make the disc unusable.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 11:48 AM
Nov 2013

Take it apart, take sandpaper to the disc. Hit it with a sledgehammer to it for a minute or two.

DrDebug

(3,847 posts)
5. Actually it's not that easy anymore
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 02:37 PM
Nov 2013

A couple of months ago, I had to demolish an old computer at work and we needed an angle grinder to cut the harddisk in slices, but the disc itself was hidden in a metal layer, so you can't even see the disc itself anymore and that was at least a 5 year old computer with a tiny 80 Gb HD.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
6. Well, It's true I haven't taken one apart in a while.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 02:47 PM
Nov 2013

I usually pull the drives, zero them, and put them aside as spares. Or recycle because there is nothing on the drive worth the effort. People ask me to do that now and then for them.

But I think we are on the same page. Power drills come to mind too. My solution is not to put things on the hard drive if I want them kept private, and also just not to have such things. And the Deity help you if you put it on the internet.

 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
9. LOL - "tiny 80 Gb HD" - my first computer had a 20 MEGABYTE HD
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 11:22 AM
Dec 2013

.
.
.



8MHz 8086 CPU, 640KB of RAM, and a 20MB hard drive, and retailed for $2295 (about $4642 in 2012 dollars when adjusted for inflation).

http://www.pcworld.com/article/258989/the_ibm_ps_2_25_years_of_pc_history.html
_______________________________________________________________________________

I paid $400 for it used in 1994 (paid $500 for my Dell Inspiron 15R - sheesh!)

I UPGRADED it to ONE MEGABYTE ram - wow, eh?

also "upgraded" from DOS 5.0 thru 6.2 - THEN Windows 3.1!

CC

ps: still own it - still works! (slooooooooooooooooooooooooooowly)

DrDebug

(3,847 posts)
10. Mine too ;)
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 11:32 AM
Dec 2013

it was even worse. That was a 4.77 MHz 8088 Blue Chip with 512 Mb and two floppy disks. Later I bought a 20 Mb hardcard. That was a 5 1/4" drive on a slot and it was top heavy as well and so it crashed after about a year. It doesn't work anymore.

There's still a page about the computer: http://classictech.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/company-profile-blue-chip-electronics-chandler-ariz/
Hey, it was actually an Hyundai with a different label. Things you learn on the internet...

?w=278&h=339

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
13. Yep, 640K and 20 Meg, you had to pay lot more for 30 Meg.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:15 PM
Dec 2013

First one I bought, an Epson. And 5 or 7 inch floppies. And BASIC.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Revealed: How British Emp...