Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hue

(4,949 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 04:28 PM Jan 2014

Dark money: How Wisconsin's most politically influential organizations avoid disclosing their donors

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/writers/jack_craver/dark-money-how-wisconsin-s-most-politically-influential-organizations-avoid/article_8ddf078f-1112-5f44-9268-cb9e5f2d3fd2.html

In the week preceding Gov. Scott Walker's 2012 recall election, amid a flurry of attack ads from all sides, one commercial treated Wisconsin television viewers to 30 seconds of supposedly home-spun Wisconsin wisdom.

"I didn't vote for Scott Walker," said a man leaning over a dock, fishing. "But I'm against the recall."

"Recall isn't the Wisconsin way," said another guy.

It concluded: "End the recall madness. Vote for Scott Walker."

The ad was sponsored by the Coalition for American Values, a mysterious Virginia-based group whose rather primitive website offered interested parties little more than a series of patriotic-themed photos — a solider greeting his son, a girl holding a flag — and an address for mailing donations. There were no names of those responsible for running the organization listed on the site.

Since the ads explicitly advocated for the election of a candidate, the group was required to report the spending to the state Government Accountability Board. But the report submitted by the Coalition for American Values didn't offer any insight into where its money was coming from. The only donor it listed was itself.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dark money: How Wisconsin's most politically influential organizations avoid disclosing their donors (Original Post) hue Jan 2014 OP
That worked then. EC Jan 2014 #1

EC

(12,287 posts)
1. That worked then.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 04:37 PM
Jan 2014

but the people that I know that voted that way, will not vote for him in the regular election. Many didn't believe in recalls and said straight out that they would let him go ahead and serve out his term, but that after that, he was done.


What we need is a good candidate and Burke isn't it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Dark money: How Wisconsin...