Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 04:23 AM Jan 2014

Why Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hates Roe v. Wade


Why Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hates Roe v. Wade

Close observers of the legal war over abortion are familiar with the story: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the leader of the Supreme Court's liberal wing, is a passionate critic of Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that turned 41 on Wednesday.

It's not that she opposes the holding that recognizes a right to an abortion. It's that she opposes the logic of the 1973 court's majority opinion and the constitutional basis under which seven justices arrived at their conclusion.

"Roe isn't really about the woman's choice, is it?" the Clinton-appointed justice said last May at the University of Chicago Law School. "It's about the doctor's freedom to practice ... it wasn't woman-centered, it was physician-centered."

Her pique is that the Roe opinion, written by Justice Harry Blackmun, relies on a "right of privacy" under the 4th Amendment and emphasizes the right of physicians to practice medicine as they see fit. She prefers that abortion rights be recognized under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, based on the view that having a child should be a woman's choice.

-snip-

Full article here: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-wade


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hates Roe v. Wade (Original Post) Tx4obama Jan 2014 OP
I knew it was about privacy, but thought it was the woman's privacy... ejpoeta Jan 2014 #1
I also believe that the 14th Amendment argument is BlueMTexpat Jan 2014 #2
I LIKE that part about it. It makes it gender neutral. In fact, I think our pro-choice pols Doctor_J Jan 2014 #3
I like Ginsburg's thinking. MicaelS Jan 2014 #4
Well, shouldn't it be about BOTH ?? eppur_se_muova Jan 2014 #5

ejpoeta

(8,933 posts)
1. I knew it was about privacy, but thought it was the woman's privacy...
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 06:56 AM
Jan 2014

I guess it makes sense that it would be about the doctor because us women can't think for ourselves. She is right. It should be about a woman's right to make her own decisions.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
2. I also believe that the 14th Amendment argument is
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:10 AM
Jan 2014

the correct one.

Sandra Day O'Connor also believes that. Had she been on the Court when Roe v. Wade was decided, we would likely have had a very different history since. See, e.g., http://www.salon.com/2013/09/16/ruth_bader_ginsburg_sandra_day_oconnor_may_have_changed_the_shape_of_roe_v_wade/

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
3. I LIKE that part about it. It makes it gender neutral. In fact, I think our pro-choice pols
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 11:44 AM
Jan 2014

make a mistake discussing it in terms of reproductive choice. it should be about the government staying out of the doctor's examination room, period.

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
4. I like Ginsburg's thinking.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 01:16 PM
Jan 2014

I have always thought the right of a woman's reproduction being based on "privacy" was weak.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Why Justice Ruth Bader Gi...