Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 11:51 AM Jan 2014

The Three Leakers and What to Do About Them

What should we make of Edward Snowden, Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning, and Julian Assange? Their names are known across the globe, yet the actions that made them famous have also driven them to lives of intense isolation—in hiding, in prison, or in a foreign embassy. They have been lionized as heroes and condemned as traitors. Snowden, a former contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), and Manning, a low-level army intelligence analyst, are responsible for the two largest unauthorized disclosures of classified information in the nation’s history.

Manning released to Assange’s website, WikiLeaks, about 720,000 secret documents from the State and Defense Departments, and Assange published them on the Internet. The NSA still doesn’t know the full extent of the information Snowden stole and passed on to the journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Barton Gellman, but it estimates the number to be 1.7 million classified documents, concerning some of the US’s most closely guarded secret surveillance programs.

The federal government views Manning and Snowden as criminals. It tried and convicted Manning for violating the Espionage Act and he was sentenced to thirty-five years in prison. (Manning subsequently announced that he was changing his gender, and hereafter would be known as Chelsea.) The government has charged Snowden with stealing government property and violating the Espionage Act, although he has thus far evaded trial by obtaining temporary asylum in Russia. And the Justice Department has empaneled a grand jury to investigate Assange, who is holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London seeking to evade extradition to Sweden for alleged sex crimes.

The prosecutors in Manning’s trial repeatedly contended that Assange actively encouraged Manning’s crimes. In November, however, a Justice Department official told the The Washington Post that Assange would not likely be prosecuted for publishing Manning’s documents. According to former Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller, “if you are not going to prosecute journalists for publishing classified information, which the department is not, then there is no way to prosecute Assange.” But the grand jury investigation continues.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/feb/06/three-leakers-and-what-do-about-them/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Three Leakers and What to Do About Them (Original Post) bemildred Jan 2014 OP
All of the right-wing press has adopted "leakers" instead of the more descriptive "whistleblowers" Doctor_J Jan 2014 #1
When they call them whistleblowers, you will know they have given up on prosecution. bemildred Jan 2014 #2
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
1. All of the right-wing press has adopted "leakers" instead of the more descriptive "whistleblowers"
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jan 2014

it would be a fascinating sociopolitical experiment to figure out how the far right has co-opted 99.9% of all of the mass media in this country over the last 25 years.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. When they call them whistleblowers, you will know they have given up on prosecution.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jan 2014

Whistleblowers have legal protections not granted to leakers. And that is all that means.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Three Leakers and Wha...