America’s Unceasing Contempt for Venezuela
March 11, 2014
Fear of the Domino Effect will Never Subside
Americas Unceasing Contempt for Venezuela
by JASON HIRTHLER
Some things never change. The petulant and undemocratic Venezuelan opposition is at it again, with the full backing and check-writing support of the U.S. government. Recent protests have inflamed the streets of Caracas, as opposition groups, as they have in the Ukraine, called for the ouster of the sitting president. I suppose its needless to note that Nicolás Maduro is Venezuelas democratically elected president, and that he won by a higher victory margin in a cleaner election than did Barack Obama in 2012. Nor is it worth asking, one supposes, that if the entire country is engulfed by dissent, as The New York Times insidiously suggested by claiming the The protests are expressing the widespread discontent with the government of President Nicolás Maduro, a socialist
, then why did Maduros party, Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (PSUV), claim wide majorities in municipal elections in December? Or why are these widespread protests largely confined to middle-class or student areas of Caracas and not rife within much larger poor neighborhoods? Or if a government has the right to arrest opposition leaders (in this case Leopoldo Lopez, the latest rabid ideologue) for inciting violence?
Public Virtue, Private Vice
Secretary of State John Kerry has ratcheted up the drivel stateside, claiming to be alarmed by reports that Maduro has detained scores of anti-government protesters and that the crackdown would have a chilling effect on free expression. A bit rich coming from a man whose own government has been icing free speech since the Snowden revelations. Kerry failed to mention whether the millions of American taxpayer dollars being funneled to the opposition were behind the violence. The Los Angeles Times described Maduros administration as an autocratic government. Opposition leader Henrique Caprilles, demolished by Maduro in last years landslide election, rejected Maduros invitation to talks and claimed one of the Latin Americas most popular political parties was a dying government.
For its part, Mercosur, the alliance of South Americas southern cone countries, denounced the violence as an attempt to destabilize a democratic government. Of course, the behavior of Maduros government in response to these street provocations ought to closely watched, as this is the new presidents first real test coping on an international stage with the intrigues of a small but virulent neoliberal opposition.
Theres plenty to suggest that this is, like Ukraine, another external attempt to uproot a democratically elected government through a volatile cocktail of in-country agitation and violence paired with global media defamation of the existing administration. It wouldnt come as a surprise. Like a frustrated and petulant infant, the United States has repeatedly attempted to derail the Bolivarian Revolution launched by former President Hugo Chavez in the late nineties, as CEPRs Mark Weisbrot has noted. It backed an anti-democratic coup by business elites in 2002 that actually succeeded for a couple of days and happily dissolved parliament before Chavez regained power. It supported an oil strike in an attempt to destabilize the economy and perhaps bring down the government. It encouraged opposition members of parliament to push for recalls (failed) and boycott National Assembly elections (useless) and clamor incessantly that last years national presidential election was rigged (false). Of course, despite being widely held to be a superior electoral process than that of the United States, Kerry was only shamed into recognizing the legitimacy of the election long after the rest of the world had.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/11/americas-unceasing-contempt-for-venezuela/